ZΣПKΛI

Attention: All my drawings would mostly be fan arts to specific friends of mine and/or popular content creators who owns their own characters/OCs. Notice the individuals will be tagged ever post made!

@Kodeska_23 Do it

Adding fuel to the fire once again it seems. I wonder should I just come back and make a video talking about this, cause this is starting to get out of control.

I noticed something hilarious on this platform: When it comes to a Hypocrite minded person makes fun of someone else’s NSFW related content or a VRC suspension abt AI accused NSFW, yet they have their own posts of Avis/characters with nearly exposed areas as 80 - 90% nsfw.

ATP imma turn off my cloning and if it happens the 3rd time. I may have to make all my Avis private.

@Grim_Harbor @Kodeska_23 Again it’s still odd of how I’m the one had to go through this while others have nsfw toggles XD

@ZenkaiVR @Kodeska_23 If it had any NSFW blendshapes or textures left it would still cause problems. Or the NSFW mesh. Disabling the ability to remove the clothing does not make the mesh SFW. You have to go through the effort to modify everything about the model to expunge the problematic content.

Look I love vrchat as a platform alright, but there comes a time when I begin to question the judgement of those who manage its moderation and wonder, is this even fair? The avatar was sfw and they still got suspended for it?

@_ViolaLayne_ @VRChat Yet you post and retweet nsfw models too lol nice try vtuber

@ZenkaiVR @VRChat Huge tips, huge ass, goonslop NSFW model with no sexual toggles.. it's still an NSFW model kid.

Welp they did it again. @VRChat The avi is completely SFW, and I know it's someone else who was wearing it.

@Kodeska_23 Yea

@ZenkaiVR Sucks that vrchat's moderation apparently can't distinguish between someone being targeted and some ACTUALLY breaking TOS, seems very algorithmic and automated to me, its almost as if its dare I say "Artificial".

@Grim_Harbor @Kodeska_23 The bones were completely removed

@ZenkaiVR @Kodeska_23 If you didn't remove NSFW bones and blendshapes and problematic textures it can still get hit. If it's in the data, they'll find it.

Wow so it didn’t matter after I shared evidence that the avi doesn’t have any nsfw (screenshots of textures in the avatar and the hierarchy of assets in the assets)

@MeggaDoom @VRChat That’s freaking crazy

@ZenkaiVR @VRChat My group was banned due to the icon having a tougue in it

@FriedWaffles8 @VRChat

@ZenkaiVR @VRChat Oh look another user uploading a public goonslop avatar and acting surprised when they get suspended

@MeggaDoom @VRChat It makes no sense since other Avis have it like that.

@ZenkaiVR @VRChat If it has a shape of a hour glass or looks suggestive they will class it even if it saw

@Ghettofurry @VRChat I assume so, cuz the incident happened when I was offline

@ZenkaiVR @VRChat I was more or less referring to you saying that you know someone else was wearing it?

@Ghettofurry @VRChat But yea I’m thinking of making the Avis private then if it keeps going.

@ZenkaiVR @VRChat I mean if that person is wearing the nsfw avatar you could just probably remove it or just make it private maybe

VRChat must’ve got that AI suspension that would just ban/suspend people for horrible reasons.

Imma Re-Upload the avi with a fixed retexture to see if it passes the rules. (The crotch area and chest area is blacked out while it blends into the armor.) If it gets reported again, imma file an appeal and show proof that the avi is not nsfw.

@NightmareFurno I retextured the Avis that removes the nsfw parts. The Karelia avi was retextured to a “Solid color anime style”. It has 0 nsfw parts.

@ZenkaiVR Does the texture itself have NSFW on them?, cause they've been banning people for having NSFW parts on textures regardless if it's clothed or not

Are you fucking kidding me?!