Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Your reputation is your gateway to onchain deals.
Yields. Airdrops. Rewards. Access.
zPass waitlists are now open!
And today, zScore goes live on @Etherscan.
Reputation has officially entered the chain.
English
ZeruAI
2.3K posts
ZeruAI
@zerufinance
Trust oracles for onchain capital allocation. Live on etherscan | Distribution network - https://t.co/lfE1ZmN0bQ
onchain Katılım Haziran 2022
53 Takip Edilen15K Takipçiler
@merheb @AndrewAsksHow Kaito showed how powerful creator incentives can be when creators of every size get rewarded.
Now the gap is moving from attention metrics to actual onchain outcomes.
That’s why we built Zaps. Private beta live for curators. DM.
English
@AndrewAsksHow 90% of infofi-born creators left cause theres no incentivization for them to post. some of them adapted and started creating content for the love of the game, others are just lost
English
Web3 creators
> Stop creating because they made no money
> Pursue a career in crypto
> Are broke
> Start an agency or have a business model
> Complain daily then leave CT
> Generate 100K+ from posting
Many from last year have quit
It’s a dangerous game to play
Get a job
English
@AndrewAsksHow Or build real leverage:
- track your community’s onchain behavior
- prove which wallets bought after your calls
- show brands actual ROI
The distribution layer is being rebuilt, most creators just don’t realize it yet.
Private beta live for curators. DM.
English
@Reental_co @brian_armstrong 100%.
Reputation should create better coordination and trust, not permanent social hierarchies. The goal is portable credibility with room for recovery, growth, and new entrants.
English
Onchain reputation can be a very powerful layer for credit, access, compliance and risk.
But it will have to be built very carefully. If the idea is to open the financial system, reputation should help create trust without becoming a permanent barrier for those who are still entering.
English
Major areas where the financial system still needs an update:
1. Tokenization of real-world assets - Real estate, stocks, bonds, funds, etc. onchain for instant settlement, fractional ownership & massive distribution.
2. 24/7 Global trading - Pooled global liquidity, every asset, every person, with great leverage and capital efficiency.
3. Next-gen payments - Near-instant, low-cost global transfers using stablecoins, including for Agentic payments.
4. AI-powered risk, credit, compliance, and advice - Better decisions, less fraud, and broader access to capital. Everyone gets access to a great financial advisor.
5. Innovation friendly regulation - Move from one-size-fits-all to risk-based rules that encourage innovation and competition instead of stifling it.
6. Expanded access - Open protocols that reduce middlemen and self-custodial wallets to expand access to everyone with a smartphone.
7. Capital formation - Low cost and turnkey for anyone to raise money for a good idea, increasing the number of startups.
8. Sound money - A refuge from inflation, when discipline is lost in fiat money.
Jobs not done until we get these working for all.
Will require lots of tech innovation and policy work to get there.
English
@AroraBhavyam ZeruAI 👀
Building the onchain reputation layer for wallets and communities - 320M+ wallets scored, live on Etherscan, 80K+ MAU.
English
Honestly, most people know only 2-3...
But there are 50+, here's a list of well-grown ones that are actually Indian:
- Avail
- Cluster Protocol
- CovalentHQ
- Kelp DAO
- Quill Audits
- Router Protocol
- Fraction AI
- Instadapp
- CopperX
- Openledger
- Mintair
- Spheron
- Chainrisk
- Push Protocol
- Offline Protocol
- Biconomy
- Everclear
- KoinX
- Reclaim Protocol
- AvantisFi
- Umbraprivacy
- MultipliFi
- Epoch Protocol
- Huddle01
Sorry if I missed yours, please mention it in the comments 👇
Maisha@maisha_anj63027
India’s most successful project. - Polygon - Sentient Am I missing any more projects?
English
@eeelistar True. Everyone's a creator now, but quality got diluted.
We're bringing back the 2020–21 high-conviction community era, except with onchain reputation and real activity instead of pure hype.
English
$100K a month is the new $10K a month
$10K a month in early 2020s used to be a sign you were doing really well as an entrepreneur, that you were ahead of the curve
Now with inflation + more online hustles than ever before, I’d say that number has shifted to $100K a month
English
@wyckoffweb The bigger question: which users actually stayed and contributed after farming ended?
That’s when onchain reputation matters, not at the snapshot but 6 months later.
English
@Overdose_AI Uh oh… still early though.
Onchain reputation is the missing piece everyone's yapping about. Privacy, AI, perps all need it to scale.
We're building it.
Mint your zScore: app.zaps.wtf
English
@Grantblocmates Agreed, fair launches and privacy are worth fighting for.
Both need the same foundation: reputation that doesn’t rely on KYC or social graphs. Onchain behavior is the only trust primitive that scales without sacrificing either.
That’s the layer we’re building at Zeru.
English
post-defi summer i think there's been a lack of protocols and teams that people could truly resonate with
the true crypto beliefs and ideals that the whole industry was built on got abandoned in pursuit of what makes money now
hyperliquid fair access gave the average person an actual chance, like the early days. it was a throwback to an immaculate conception for tokens (the closer to fair launch the better). self-funded and released into the community
privacy is as big an undertaking to permeate society as everything that has previously come before it
this will be the hardest road and most difficult battle yet. it will be harder than any form of institutional adoption we have seen recently
it is a fight worth fighting and i think people are beginning to feel something for the first time in a long time
it feels good again, in all honesty
English
@teddi_speaks Bear markets are where reputations and communities get built.
Mint your zScore. Future rewards, access, and opportunities will increasingly favor wallets with proven onchain history.
app.zaps.wtf
English
Ive been in crypto long enough to know its times/conditions like these the biggest cooks spring up & gets everyone believing again.
Keep Showing up.
English
@MarvinHarryP The real differentiator isn't creator vs retail.
It's outcomes vs attention.
Measure creators by onchain actions: who bought, volume generated, conviction. Not impressions, but actions.
We built this. Private beta live for curators.
DM if you want in.
English
Verified followers are overrated.
They are mostly creators, builders, founders etc.
But the end goal should be to have a big retail community that consumes your content, not mainly other creators.
Sure, it depends which goal you have with your content. But I see 90% of CT making content for other creators.
The other 10% make content for retail, and they get really good numbers doing it.
If you only make content for other creators without a clear goal behind it, you're limiting your reach for no reason.
Do you create content for other creators, or for retail?
English
@TedPillows Probably.
And when that phase comes, curators with high-conviction communities and measurable onchain impact will stand out a lot more than accounts optimized just for reach.
English
@MrTimister This is why transparent attribution and onchain reputation matter.
Protocols need better ways to distinguish real users, retained users, and actual ecosystem contributors from pure incentive farming.
English
On a side note, I predicted that MegaETH has a huge Problem, while everybody was glazing it.
Many questions are still open:
> Will creators get rewarded?
> How much supply will be distributed?
> Why the sunset?
Here are a few predictions:
> This didnt pay off for them. $20M airdrop for a program that lasts 8 weeks.
There are close to 0 useful apps and not enough fee generating apps, it would've been an extreme -EV for them.
Many of the Apps were just Casinos.
What's obvious: if I land in top 450 on such a huge chain, that means theres not much usage.
> Creators might actually be rewarded
After seeing @MarvinHarryP ask the Team I think this could actually happen, but in a disappointing way. They would've teased it more
But now that they're in a bad situation with their token/ecosystem/airdrop they NEED good vibes on the timeline
The best way to do so? Reward creators, when they don't expect it.
My guess; bigger KOLs like @waleswoosh who've been posting a lot about the chain might Cook here
> My guess on the supply: 0.25%
Idk why, its just a feeling. From the beginning on they weren't transparent with the rewards
I think it could have been 4 seasons with 0.625% each
Sunsetting after 3 weeks and in season 1 could result in 0.25% in my opinion
Longer post than usual, but I Just wanted to give my opinion about the terminal sunset
Now its time to hear about your opinion!
Will they reward creators?
Why did they shut down?
How will the rewards look like?
MrTimister@MrTimister
English
@waleswoosh Maybe one big win can change your portfolio.
But consistent onchain activity is what builds long-term reputation and access.
English
Crypto is great because you literally only need one big win to make it.
One big airdrop, one good ICO investment, one huge trade etc and you can change your life
English
@ImperiumPaper A lot of crypto metrics still miss user quality and behavior entirely.
Capital flows matter, but eventually protocols will care just as much about who consistently uses, repays, contributes, and stays active onchain.
English
Once again a teaching moment to increase financial literacy:
Do not to use TVL to measure the adoption of a stablecoin. It’s like counting only physical coins and paper bills. Most money is ledger money in a bank account, and stablecoins are not some exception to this rule.
Most stablecoins are MUCH larger than their official TVL, because most money (of any currency) is created through fractional reserve lending.
This means Aave, Compound, Morpho, etc in DeFi. Once a stablecoin enters the fractional reserve system, the supply tends to explode, and usually more ledger money than token money.
Main use of measuring token money is to see what size float the issuer can monetize on a given day. Likewise, TVL of a lending pool or protocol is closer to a reserve ratio than anything else
Mike 🐧✳️@absforeever
It seems like @ethena pulled $400M from MegaETH Didn't think my prediction would come true this fast Wen native yield on @AbstractChain? Sure, Abstract still lacks liquidity (project quantum soon), but it makes way more sense there than on MegaETH or, god forbid, TON
English
@StaniKulechov Good point.
A lot of crypto still tracks surface-level numbers because they’re easy to display.
But long term, protocols will care more about who borrows repeatedly, repays consistently, refers quality users, and actually sticks around.
English
One of the biggest mistakes in valuing DeFi lending protocols is using TVL as the primary metric.
TVL measures net collateral. It does not measure lending activity.
Compare Aave vs SoFi at the end of 2025:
Aave
~$52B supplied
~$22B active loans (the loan book)
~$700M+ borrowing interest flows
~$150M retained by the DAO
SoFi
~$37.5B deposits
~$38B loan book
~$1.8B lending revenue (interest earned)
~$481M net income
In TradFi:
deposits are liabilities / cost of capital
loans are the earning assets
lenders are analyzed on loan books, interest income, spreads, and asset growth
But in DeFi, the market mostly looks at TVL and DAO-retained fees.
That’s like valuing a bank only on net interest spread while ignoring the size of the loan book and gross interest flows.
Under traditional financial accounting frameworks, Aave looks far closer to a +$700M lending business than a $150M revenue protocol to be comparable (without counting equity).
TVL is not the revenue basis for lending protocols.
Loan books and interest flows are.
PaperImperium@ImperiumPaper
A major unforced error in crypto is treating technical dashboards as financial dashboards. Nowhere is this as obvious as with TVL of lending protocols. TVL is NOT a substitute for accounting! Let’s look at TVL defined as “Value of all coins held in smart contracts of the protocol”, and how it would treat a bank with the following balance sheet: Deposits (a liability): $100m Loans (an asset): $80m Reserves (an asset): $20m Equity: $10m The TVL of this simplified balance sheet would show up as: $100m deposits - $80m loans + $10m equity = $30m TVL Does that feel accurate to you? It should not, because it structurally undercounts economic activity. In fact, TVL - a technical metric - is treating the bank’s largest asset (its loan book) as a liability and largest liability (its deposits) as an asset! The problem is one of using the wrong tool for the job. TVL counts how many tokens are in a smart contract or group of affiliated smart contracts. That’s it. In its most simple form, TVL is mostly just counting the reserve ratio of the bank (or lending protocol). TVL is not a substitute for actual accounting, and people need to understand this. A deposit on Aave/Morpho/SparkLend/Compound/Euler/Curvance is a liability to that protocol or pool. You could put $1 trillion in deposits onto one of those platforms and TVL would become $1 trillion. But that’s not an indication of economic activity! Now imagine $999.999 billion of that got lent out. TVL has crashed from $1 trillion to $1 million. Looks bad on a chart, right? But now we’re seeing economic activity! There is a reason why TVL is not used outside of crypto - it is a technical metric, not a financial one, and any overlap is coincidental and concentrated in very basic protocols like DEXes.
English
Most wallets are optimized for extraction. The next cycle rewards wallets optimized for reputation.
That changes everything: airdrops, credit, access, incentives, AI agent trust.
The wallets building real history today will have an edge tomorrow.
Check your zScore: app.zaps.wtf
English