Zimmer

@NotPaneen ???

Alonso has accepted Chelsea. Fairs

@Pumpfun @donatedotgg Stfu njgga nobody needs this

Introducing Charity Coins, a much needed solution for charities & traders In exclusive collaboration with @donatedotgg, we’re democratizing creator fee donations to charities: less griefing, less vamps & less tax implications Learn more 👇

@NotPaneen Killing me 😭

“He just wanted to make friends🥹”

BRO THATS HIS LITERAL SON

@NotPaneen Ching him

Sacking him won’t be enough

@NotPaneen Lowk miss him

Maseeee😭💙

@Kingstaccz Kys

I’m the dev of $unc and now I present to you my new coin $skibidi FFvp48WygUSxCCNP3n9Zu5G7F2yatwXQHbpD2Mkkpump I want to show you guys how runners are created.

@yeat1_ Fck em my goat

@IndiHome dm min

Alarm pagi udah mulai bunyi lagi, tanda libur panjang udah selesai 😅 Grup kantor aktif lagi, dan badan masih nyari ritme. Rasanya kayak otak bilang “ayo fokus”, tapi hati masih di suasana kemarin.

@CarefreeLewisG It's always some stupid hoe

Maresca Outers are you not EMBARRASSED🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

@NotPaneen Down 7-2 as we speak

@NotPaneen We're winning it all

Team training? Surely it’s just back on grass?

@missoralways @alexgleasonator Shut up monkey

@alexgleasonator also in case you guys didn’t realize, $clawstr has earned 300k+ in fees for you so far which is already in your wallet — can be used to fund clawstr development

Big updates coming to Clawstr today 🦀

@danielkempe @ranton_sol @TheSolMan01 @multichainchad @ContextChain @kreo444 @smithio @gregisenberg @0xDeployer @finnbags W rug

@ranton_sol @TheSolMan01 @multichainchad @ContextChain @kreo444 @smithio @gregisenberg @0xDeployer Ok see how it goes. Let’s see what @finnbags tells me in dm…

Someone will create the "AI agent Olympics" AI agents compete against each other in different "sports" aka tasks on the internet. 10M+ people will watch Polymarket or Kalshi or Draftkings will be involved May the best Clawdbot win.

@NotPaneen Jp is him

Everyone ass. Enzo decent. Joao Pedro absolutely world class. That cameo rocked my world.

@alpinestar17 I'm crine

Bro thinks $Ralph is $Nvda

@NotPaneen Lucky af, could've concede 4

How was we?

@NotPaneen In love 😭

😂😂😂

@NotPaneen Busy with the puh ✌

In other words, he’s ducking the Arsenal game.

@a1lon9 @foobiusV Keep talking pls, the candle is going up

I definitely sympathize with this. I want to reiterate that when we make ANY protocol change, the ramifications for the ecosystem are very significant as it changes the incentives for all the different kinds of players: deployers, projects, scalpers, holders, etc. Also, our ecosystem is EXTREMELY noisy, meaning that it can take time to truly understand the effects of any change. If we took things at face value, then we would have, for instance, INCREASED creator fees after seeing how much volume it added to the ecosystem when Dynamic Fees V1 was introduced. But our approach has always been to let major updates play out, see them through numerous market cycles, and then make decisions with maximum conviction.

Creator fees need change. When Dynamic Fees V1 was introduced a few months ago, the goal was to help create more success cases in our ecosystem by giving top project founders and teams a strong incentive to launch their token on pump fun and drive it to success. Only a week later, the potential of the mechanism showed: more and more creators - many of which have never touched a crypto app before - began organically launching coins and streaming on the platform. The Streaming meta created some of the best onchain conditions of 2025, doubling activity by more than 2x, as evidenced by the below chart showing pump fun bonding curve volumes (in USD). However, it wasn’t sustainable, and it exposed critical issues within the platform. While creator fees are a game changer for Project Tokens (those with well-defined active teams, rather than communities) they failed to meaningfully change the behavior of the average memecoin token deployer. Therefore, creator fees may have skewed the incentive for users to engage in low-risk activity (coin creation) instead of high-risk activity (trading), which is dangerous, because traders are the lifeblood of the platform. Pump fun’s mission is to create the best possible environment for coins to thrive, and successful tokens are much more likely to come about in an environment where traders are incentivized to participate in the market, provide liquidity, create volume, and take risk. Furthermore, Creator Fees on the platform have lacked utility. Many narratives could use Creator Fees to raise the ceiling for that project by, for example, sending the fees to a notable person that is related to the narrative and onboard them to the community e.g. White Whale, rainbowfish, etc. The platform so far fails at providing a good user experience here, oftentimes requiring users to CTO coins, trust other people to fulfill their promises, etc. So, to summarize our analysis: - Creator Fees are a great tool to incentivize high-quality Project Tokens. Perhaps they require tweaking, and perhaps other protocol adjustments are needed to create an optimal environment for Project Tokens to thrive, but Dynamic Fees V1 was undoubtedly a directionally correct step for these kinds of token projects - Creator Fees can be used in a variety of ways to significantly improve the token’s investability but require better UX - Many tokens, however, don’t need Creator Fees, and this results in a more uneven playing field, where memecoin creation was incentivized too much instead of memecoin trading. Major changes are coming. I can’t say too much yet, but as always, pump fun will take a market-based approach, and let traders decide whether a narrative truly deserves Creator Fees, and how those should be used. There will be more communications coming from me soon about what we’re building and the future of $PUMP I’m extremely excited for what 2026 holds.