
zomboide
1.2K posts

zomboide
@ZombieSimo
born, still alive, a day, probably, I will die



Even when faced with overwhelming evidence that trans women are not men when it comes to athletics, the anti-trans lobby was able to convince people that basically 2 + 2 does not equal 4. I will repeat the statistics here. I've been repeating them for 10 years because even 10 years ago there was overwhelming evidence with 40 years of data. Now it's 50 years. Banning Trans Not Statistically Supported Nor are bans morally justified. 1. Start with STATISTICS .... ZERO is the key statistic wrt trans in sports In all but one statistic and that's revealed at bottom. ZERO professional tennis championships since 1976 when allowed, 50 years of data. worldtennismagazine.com/when-transsexu… ZERO Olympic medals since being allowed 21 years ago covering 12 Olympics. sf.gov/trans-women-in… That alone is enough data, but there's more! ZERO trans women have ever made it onto a WNBA basketball team, the precise physique that so many anti-trans people claim gives them an advantage! And note, they are allowed, just no one's ever made it onto a team! ZERO trans women have EVER been on any NCAA Division 1 team sport that has ranked in the top 25. ZERO scholarships have been held in the NCAA by trans women. (Find one!) You can find them for trans men, Schuyler Bailar, a trans man received a scholarship for swimming at Harvard. Over 7 million women have competed in the Olympics and NCAA across ALL sports with trans allowed to compete. There's only been one top level victory by a trans woman. Lia Thomas won 1 event in Division 1. 1/7,000,000 is effectively ZERO! Lia was ranked #2 against men in the Ivy League her Sophomore year before HRT, and one of the most used pieces of propaganda is her Junior year on HRT where she slipped to nearly 500th in the NCAA rankings of men. Transphobes unwittingly proved HRT works! en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lia_Thomas But what about the UN report showing 600 plus medals won by trans women? If you believe that is valid you need to watch this by John Oliver. youtu.be/flSS1tjoxf0 2. What about SCIENCE? If actual outcomes compiling statistics is not compelling enough for you how about a physiological study that was done by the Olympics to ensure bias was removed. Here it is: bjsm.bmj.com/content/58/11/… The summary is this "Trans women athletes are at a relative disadvantage in many key physical areas relating to athletic ability and perform worse on cardiovascular tests than their cisgender counterparts." Since then of course follow on studies have shown trans women do not have advantages. them.us/story/new-stud… Now if you're saying " Wait a minute this isn't right because I've seen other studies!" Go back and look at those other studies and you will see they were comparing cisgender men and women, not trans women against cisgender women. 3. Consider the influence of PROPAGANDA. Even with the scientific studies as well as statistical results, many people are still not convinced because they see propaganda showing a trans woman winning something often by a large margin, if you look into the details you will discover that the time or result is nowhere near competing at the top level within that particular sport. It makes for great propaganda to show a trans woman winning by 30 yards in something like a long-distance race in non lower divisions such as Division 6 California (small town division). And as mentioned above, most of the physiological studies that people are saying are "science" being pushed by the far right are comparisons of cisgender men and women. Those are invalid. Trans women do not have the athletic capabilities of cisgender men once they are on blockers and HRT. The blatent lies have been horrific. For example, Payton McNabb was injured by a cisgender girl but the press just all accepted and ran with the idea that it was a trans girl. That's just the tip of the iceberg! Here's an article about the lies. 1- snopes.com/news/2025/03/1…



“If you discover a safeguarding problem in an organisation, you don’t say, ‘stop doing that in September’ – you act now.” @MForstater speaks to @JuliaHB1 @TalkTV about the legal action against Girlguiding arguing that the terms of the ban present a safeguarding issue.















After today's excellent decision by the IOC.,if the Rio 2016 women's 800m. was held today, the 3 medallists in my photo. Wambui, Niyonsaba & Semenya would be barred and the medals would go to Canada's Melissa Bishop, Poland's Joanna Jozwik & GB's Lynsey Sharp @AthleticsWeekly


































