
Dr. Swati Kushwaha
180 posts

Dr. Swati Kushwaha
@_Arcturus_13_
GP. Mistakes are over-rated... Let this be Exhibit-A!!








For some reason, there is this new narrative on twitter that Ayurveda is outdated. Used to work earlier but doesn't anymore. There are many issues with this narrative: 1. This is contradictory. It admits that it used to work. So it was not a pseudo science. Because how can anything which works can be pseudoscience. And then says it doesn't anymore. If anything worked 200 or 2000 years back, it would be guaranteed to work even now. You can at best argue that you have more evolved systems now but can not say it doesn't work. Swords still 'work' and can kill a man even though we have brahmos missiles today. So people need to make up their mind if it ever worked or not. 2. Modern science is not an evolution of Ayurveda or Homeopathy. Both handle the disease very differently. The approach itself is different. Allopathy is very reactive. If disease is X, and we know Y counteracts X - then give Y to patient. Do 1000 trials to observe efficacy and side effects of Y and then approve it. Works. But Ayurveda tries to understand how did X start in the body. Basic science of Ayurveda is that any internal disease is caused by imbalance of body doshas. And then it attempts to cure those imbalances. Doesn't attempt to directly address X. Modern science is not there yet. It is not taking that approach. That's why it calls it pseudo science. That's why I say it will take another 40-50 yrs for modern science to reach that level. I don't know if it will ever credit Ayurveda even when it discovers those things or will just come up with new modern names for those branches of medicine. So no, it is not that Allopathy is an evolution of Ayurveda. The whole approach to cure a disease itself is different.





📍BEFORE SURGERY: Doctors chant the Dhanvantri Stotra — calling upon the divine healer 🙏 Jai Sanatan Dharma 🚩
















