Seth 🇵🇸
29.5K posts

Seth 🇵🇸
@_HAWKISH
92 til infinity | CFC & McLaren | From each according to their ability to each according to their needs. He/him
London, England Katılım Haziran 2022
707 Takip Edilen101 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet

@StanislavPetrov @OsitaNwanevu If a member of my family was a nazi, it doesn't matter if they droned on about it or not. I would be more than justified in never wanting to speak to them again
English

@OsitaNwanevu Because no matter how despicable the political position of a family member, it's irrelevant compared to the fact that they are family. Holding a political position is distinct from being a boorish asshole who constantly harps about politics, which decent family members don't do.
English

I'd like to hear a rational argument for the obverse of the poll question — that it is 'never acceptable to cut off family or friends over opposing political views.'
Lakshya Jain@lxeagle17
It probably wouldn’t surprise you to see that liberals are way more likely to approve of cutting friends and family off. But here’s something interesting: this is heavily driven by younger liberals. 74% of voters under 45 say they’d cut off friends over opposing political views.
English
Seth 🇵🇸 retweetledi

@Provokethoughtz You're ideas of "wrong" and "right" have been completely rewritten by wokeness
English

@SolidXplorer @_JessicaDavies Seems you sont actually care about women saying this shit
English

@_JessicaDavies The day of the liberal woman is coming to an end thankfully
But what comes next might be much worse and that's on your shoulders
Dumb bitch
English

I don’t know one woman who would tell you that having random groups of men who are private citizens aggressively patrolling the streets would make them feel safer.
Times Radio@TimesRadio
“It's the gentlemanly thing to do.” Reform UK deputy leader @TiceRichard backs more private groups of men patrolling the streets to protect women “on a Neighbourhood Watch-style basis within the bounds of the law”. @KateEMcCann | @AlexisConran
English

@lil_man_winston @stengel The homicide rate is down from last year either way.
Again, you would rather lap up the constant distractions pumped out by a corrupt administration than face up to Trump being a pedophile rapist liar who wants a fascist state under his dictatorship
English

Crime in DC is at a 30-year low. It's not even in top 10 dangerous cities in US. Throughout history, autocrats use a false pretext to impose government control over local law enforcement as a prelude to a more national takeover. That's far more dangerous than the situation he says he is fixing.
English

@lil_man_winston @stengel So your entire argument is Trump should be allowed to do this because of the homicide rate exclusively?
Something which is down from last year?
You just eat up these distractions one after another to defend a pedophile fascist.
English

@lil_man_winston @stengel justice.gov/usao-dc/pr/vio… Yet they published this just a few months ago.
stop falling for fascism
English

@CassowaryBTC @CricketSurfing @DrewSav "How dare you call me uneducated, all I got wrong was the % of emissions meat farming is responsible for, the % of biomass that it makes up, the fact 15% of emissions stopping would help billions, that less emissions come from shipping veggies to raising cows etc etc"
lmao
English

@CassowaryBTC @CricketSurfing @DrewSav Numbers are entirely how you demonstrate mitigation.
You are being so incredibley stupid right now.
This is why you dropped the immorality scaling argument because you know your position is horseshit
English

@CassowaryBTC @CricketSurfing @DrewSav That is literally my point. You had no idea what it was and clearly have zero maths intuition if you think 15% of anything isn't major like what
People are ignorant to the emissions, to the scale of animals, even to 40% of all food grown toward feeding other animals!
English

@CassowaryBTC @CricketSurfing @DrewSav You could have essentially zero harmful emissions if they took an electric train.
You really are struggling with the term mitigation
You want to attack my mitigation (which still extends to protecting the 2%) to justify a much larger scale of damage

English









