Seyi هارون

Please pray for me, when you hear of my death. Pray Allah pardons me, shines His light in my grave and grant me paradise. Forgive me, if by any chance, I may have offended you. And if at the moment, I’m in any debt, reach out to my friends and family. 🤍🤍

I hope all your Arafah du’as get accepted.

Dear @DanBurmawy, I made a promise I won’t go hard on anybody today because apparently today is our Eid Celebration. But, Burmawi won’t let me. Your entire argument is a classic display of profound historical and textual ignorance, built on a desperate attempt to sound deep while completely misrepresenting both the Bible and the historical record. You call the Islamic position theological vandalism. Really? Funnily, you do not even realize you are defending a text that biblical scholars themselves have flagged for centuries as a compromised, heavily edited document. First of all, let me start with the unforgivable textual contradiction in Genesis 22:2, where your text says, "Take your son, your only son, whom you love—Isaac." Burmawi, anyone with a basic sense of logic can see the glitch here. Isaac was never, at any point in his life, Abraham’s only son. Ishmael was born fourteen years before Isaac. The only time Abraham ever had an "only son" was before Isaac was even born, when Ishmael was his single child. This is not even an Islamic argument; this is standard, objective biblical scholarship. Top Western theologians and textual critics, such as Dr. T.C. Mitchell (former Keeper of Western Asiatic Antiquities at the British Museum) and the renowned biblical scholar Dr. Robert Alter, have written extensively on how the Hebrew word Yachid (only/unique) in this text is completely irreconcilable with Isaac's historical position. The text explicitly demands a firstborn who was an only child for a period, which historically fits nobody but Ishmael. What you are reading is a clear case of later scribal interpolation, where later writers crossed out Ishmael's name and inserted Isaac to serve a nationalistic, tribal narrative. Unfortunately for them, they completely forgot to fix the "only son" blunder they left in the verse. lol 😂 Again, your attempt to reduce Ishmael to a mistake of "human performance" completely exposes your ignorance of the Old Testament itself. In Genesis 16:11, it is the Angel of the Lord who commands Hagar to name the child Ishmael, which means "God hears." God does not name mistakes. Also, in Genesis 17:20, God explicitly says, "And as for Ishmael, I have heard you: I will surely bless him; I will make him fruitful and will greatly increase his numbers. He will be the father of twelve rulers, and I will make him into a great nation." Dr. John Van Seters, a biblical historian noted here that the promises of greatness and covenant blessings given to Ishmael in the text run completely parallel to those given to Isaac. Therefore, calling Ishmael a product of mere human scheming is a direct contradiction of the very scripture you are trying to preach from. Let me also say that your reliance on Paul’s allegory in Galatians 4 to frame Ishmael as "the law and bondage" is a big chronological leap. Paul was simply writing an ideological polemic in the first century to convince a Roman-era audience to abandon Jewish legalism. So, using a first-century rhetorical allegory to rewrite a historical event that happened two thousand years before is not scholarship; it is a desperate theological spin, and that shows how ignorant and mischievous you are. Burmawi, note this: The Islamic narrative did not hijack or distort anything. Okay? It simply restored the story to its logical, geographical, and historical truth. Abraham was asked to sacrifice his firstborn, the child of his lonely old age, in absolute submission. You exchanged the historical firstborn for a younger son to fit your tribal exclusivity. Then you wrapped it in flowery language about “grace” versus “works” to hide the factual error. Next time you want to accuse an entire civilization of theological vandalism, try reading your own book with the lights on first. I hope this clears your mischief. Allah knows best.

Plus you don’t teach/force romance, you’re just wasting your time.

Damn I see it.

Was designed to be difficult and time consuming. That way, the majority of people who succeed are the unemployed and elderly pensioners. “Coincidentally”, some of the easily exploitable groups.

Normally, we suppose don trek reach Aso rock now dey drop demands. But me and you, cowards!

I have never seen a Nigerian woman out-romance her significant other, in my life.

Wallahi I love Eid soooo much. The energy, positivity, oneness, and happiness, all for the remembrance of Allah. Alhamdulillah for being Muslim. May we live to witness many more.

Just because a guy carries a situation very well doesn’t mean it’s not heavy on him.

Eid ul Adha is a reminder that nothing should be loved more than Allah. Not a person. Not your desires. Not this dunya. Because the story of sacrifice was never just about ibrahim[AS] and ismael[AS], it's also about us and what we're willing to give up for Allah.

@nuuxr_x That’s what I thought.

This tweet may seem insensitive but I don’t think she meant any harm. The govt like eye service, unfortunately—so make em at least rescue the children.

Horrible interface tbh Everything everywhere at the same time. You have to open eye properly to do anything.

I’ve never performed Eid Ghusl before. Today, I did. You people do not know how much influence what we consume here does to us. Kudos to all the people who post reminders about beneficial actions. I love you all

Why you dey watch movie, still dey press phone?

@_Imharoon i’m proud of you

I am now physically and mentally incapable of finishing a bottle of soda and I’m proud.

Interesting

🤣🤣🤣🤣😭😭😭😭😭

My hot take (and it's not even that hot), is that voter registration (especially how it's done in Nigeria) is voter suppression.