Ola
4.1K posts


If speaking up at work is hard for you, borrow these 6 sentences. They would help whenever you are stuck
1. Clarifying before you start
“Just to confirm, the goal is ____, and ‘done’ looks like ___, right?”
2. When you’re blocked
“I’m blocked on ___. I tried ___ and ___.
Can someone help with the best next step?,
How do i move this forward?”
3. When you’re unsure where to begin
“I might be missing something. what would you do first if you were approaching this?”
4. Raising an issue early
“I’m seeing ___ which may impact ___.
Can we confirm the owner / next step?”
5. Disagreeing respectfully
“I see the logic. One concern though, if we do ___, could it lead to ___? Should we consider ___?”
6. A confident status update
“Update: ___ is done . Next: ___. Blocked by ___. I’ll share another update by ___.”
English

If you’re a Data Analyst, CRM Analyst, or aspiring Marketing Analyst who wants to move from Junior into senior-level commercial impact in the next 12 weeks, read this. 👇👇
You don’t get promoted for building dashboards.
You get promoted for influencing revenue.
Most analysts stop at reporting:
- CTR.
- Conversion rate.
- CPA.
Senior analysts answer:
Where should we scale?
What should we cut?
Why did revenue move?
What do we do next?
That’s a different level of thinking.
So I built a 12-week practical roadmap designed to move you from metric reporting to commercial decision-making.
No theory-heavy fluff.
No passive courses.
No random portfolio projects.
Just 7 real-world builds using real datasets:
• Campaign ROI & budget reallocation
• Conversion prediction (lead scoring)
• A/B testing with statistical confidence
• RFM segmentation for retention strategy
• Churn risk analysis
• Cohort retention modelling
• Marketing mix & incrementality thinking
By the end, you’ll have:
• 6–8 commercial case studies
• A strong public portfolio
• Clear KPI fluency
• Interview-ready impact stories
This is how you transition from “analyst” to revenue operator.
If that’s your goal, reply ROADMAP, REPOST, and I’ll share it to your DM.

English

I stopped posting… because I was struggling to live what I used to teach.
I haven’t posted since June 2025, and I’ve thought about coming back a lot.
Truth is, I didn’t go quiet because I ran out of ideas.
I went quiet because I was overwhelmed at work, and embarrassed that I was “working hard” but still not delivering the way I knew I could.
It looked like this:
- I’d get a task and freeze because I wasn’t fully clear
- Instead of asking, I’d go into “figure it out myself” mode
- Hours would pass… sometimes days
And then I’d feel even more behind, more ashamed, more quiet.
And the painful part? It wasn’t that I lacked skill.
It was that I was scared of asking “stupid” questions and speaking up.
A friend said something that shifted everything for me; 'Clarity isn’t weakness, it is professionalism'
It was an AHA!! moment.
Now, i follow a simple rule before I start any work; i ask 2 questions
1. What do you want?
2. What does “done” look like?
Take it from me, silence doesn’t protect you.
It delays delivery, increases mistakes and quietly damages confidence.
So I’m back, and I’m going to document this journey honestly.
Not motivation. Not vibes. Practical systems.
If you’re early–mid career and you’ve ever struggled silently at work, you’re not alone, and i know, we are many 😆

English
Ola retweetledi

Social Capital put $10M into Groq’s seed round in April 2017 when the company was worth roughly $30M post-money. That single check bought about 33% of the company. Then they doubled down with $52.3M in a 2018 convertible note.
Total deployed: $62.3M.
Here’s where it gets interesting. Groq raised $300M at $1.1B in 2021, then $640M at $2.8B in 2024, then $750M at $6.9B in September 2025. Each round diluted early investors. But Social Capital had board seats and likely maintained some pro-rata through the convertible.
Conservative math: They own somewhere between 15-20% of Groq today. At $20B, that’s $3B to $4B in value.
$62M in. $3-4B out. That’s a 50-65x return in 8 years.
For context, this single investment is worth more than Social Capital’s entire fund size in 2015 ($1.1B). One bet. Eight years. 50x.
The timing is the wildest part. Chamath invested in custom AI chips in 2017, years before ChatGPT made inference compute a thing. He sat on the board until 2021, then stepped back right as the company was entering its growth phase.
Now Nvidia is paying $20B in cash because they need Groq’s LPU architecture for inference at scale. Jensen is essentially writing Chamath a check for being early on the inference bottleneck.
Say what you want about his SPACs. This one makes up for a lot of Clover Health bags.
Boring_Business@BoringBiz_
Chamath after making $4B from a seed investment in Groq (just announced $20B sale to NVIDIA) One of the best venture outcomes of all time
English


Ola retweetledi

After you get married, you’re going to meet ‘better’ people than your spouse. You’re going to meet more good-looking people; kinder and more romantic people; more intelligent and funny people. You will meet people who have in abundance what your partner lacks. The mushy and romanticized idea that your partner will be everything to you, and will satisfy all your needs and wants is idolatry. Contentment in marriage is a virtue not often spoken about.
You must wake up every day appreciating everything your partner is to you, everything they have, their beauty and the things that made you marry them because if you focus on everything they don’t do well, you’ll always meet better people. Protect your heart! See their best part, and always remember that your commitment to marry is more of a duty than it is of mushy feelings. You have to stay committed even on the days you feel your spouse is no longer the best fit for you…
-Buchi

English
Ola retweetledi

I supported Messi throughout the years against Nigeria and you’re talking about Lamine Yamal
ChocoTribe@Debbybruno3
Nobody is as confused as Barcelona fans right now 😂
English
Ola retweetledi

I was CEO and Peter reported to me, so could not fire me. It was a palace coup by most (not all) of the exec team and most of the board, who were worried that my decisions were too risky.
I was the largest shareholder in the company. There was nothing anyone could have done to take my shares away from me.
English
Ola retweetledi
Ola retweetledi

A Palindrome is a word that reads the same forward and backwards. E.g Madam, Level, Radar.
An Emordnilap is a word that forms a different valid word when spelled backward. E.g, Stressed (Desserts) Evil(Live)
Palindrome spelt backwards is…
There you have it 🤭
AndyJnr ° Umaru @AndyjnrUmaru
Tell me something that’s none of my business 🤲🏾
English
Ola retweetledi
Ola retweetledi

Elon Musk just confirmed the most INSANE IPO in history.
SpaceX is going public in 2026.
$1.5 TRILLION valuation. Raising $30+ billion.
That's the biggest IPO ever made. Beating Saudi Aramco's $29 billion record from 2019.
But here's what everyone's missing:
This isn't about space tourism or Mars missions.
Elon is literally about to win the entire AI race.
And 99% of people have no idea how...
Here's the problem killing every AI company right now:
POWER.
Oracle just reported earnings.
They burned through $12 BILLION in one quarter building data centers.
Their free cash flow? NEGATIVE $10 billion.
Revenue missed estimates. Stock crashed 11%.
Microsoft, Amazon, Google all scrambling to find enough electricity for AI training.
The brutal math:
The US generates 490 gigawatts of total power.
AI is projected to need 123 gigawatts by 2035.
That's a QUARTER of the entire electrical grid. Just for artificial intelligence.
Goldman Sachs says AI energy demand could jump 165% by 2030.
There is literally not enough power on Earth to run AI at the scale these companies are promising.
Every data center needs massive cooling systems. Billions of gallons of water per year. Insane energy costs.
And the infrastructure can't keep up.
Elon's solution?
Stop building on Earth entirely.
SpaceX is building data centers in SPACE.
Not a concept. Not 10 years out. Literally starting in 2026.
They're upgrading Starlink V3 satellites to carry AI computing chips.
Each satellite gets 24/7 solar power. No clouds. No night. No weather disruptions. No grid bottlenecks.
And the insane part is that Starship can deliver 300 to 500 gigawatts of solar-powered AI satellites into orbit every single year.
At 300 gigawatts per year, the AI computing power in space would exceed the entire U.S. economy's total electricity consumption within two years.
Just from satellites. Processing in orbit.
While Oracle is begging banks for loans to finish data centers and OpenAI is stuck in circular funding arrangements with Microsoft, Elon already owns everything:
The rockets. The satellites. The launch infrastructure. The AI company (xAI).
He doesn't need to ask utilities for permission.
Doesn't need grid approvals from local governments.
Doesn't need to build nuclear plants or wait for clean energy.
He just launches.
And everyone else is scrambling to catch up:
Jeff Bezos sees it. Blue Origin announced they're building their own orbital data centers.
Google just launched "Project Suncatcher" with plans to deploy AI satellites by 2027.
Eric Schmidt, the former CEO of Google, literally BOUGHT an entire rocket company (Relativity Space) just to compete in this space.
But they're all 3+ years behind Elon.
SpaceX already has 6,000+ Starlink satellites in orbit. The infrastructure is built.
The $30 billion from the IPO?
Going straight into scaling orbital compute.
SpaceX revenue is jumping from $15 billion in 2025 to $24 billion in 2026.
Most of that from Starlink. Now add space-based AI infrastructure on top.
Here's why this matters:
Whoever controls orbital computing controls the AI revolution.
And there's only ONE company on Earth with fully reusable rockets that can launch at the scale required.
Jensen Huang, Nvidia's CEO, called space data centers "a dream."
Translation: Nvidia is screwed if Elon actually pulls this off.
Because if SpaceX succeeds, every AI company on the planet becomes Elon's customer.
OpenAI needs compute? Running on SpaceX satellites.
Google needs more capacity? Renting orbital infrastructure.
Microsoft needs power? Paying SpaceX for launch and compute access.
Elon won't just be in the AI race.
He'll own the entire track everyone else is running on.
The $1.5 trillion valuation sounds crazy until you realize what he's actually building.
It's not a rocket company. It's the infrastructure layer for the next 50 years of computing.
People calling it overvalued have no idea what's coming.
English

