Ola

4.1K posts

Ola

Ola

@__Ola_____

Katılım Ağustos 2016
1K Takip Edilen68 Takipçiler
Wofai Eyong
Wofai Eyong@phaibooboo·
If speaking up at work is hard for you, borrow these 6 sentences. They would help whenever you are stuck 1. Clarifying before you start “Just to confirm, the goal is ____, and ‘done’ looks like ___, right?” 2. When you’re blocked “I’m blocked on ___. I tried ___ and ___. Can someone help with the best next step?, How do i move this forward?” 3. When you’re unsure where to begin “I might be missing something. what would you do first if you were approaching this?” 4. Raising an issue early “I’m seeing ___ which may impact ___. Can we confirm the owner / next step?” 5. Disagreeing respectfully “I see the logic. One concern though, if we do ___, could it lead to ___? Should we consider ___?” 6. A confident status update “Update: ___ is done . Next: ___. Blocked by ___. I’ll share another update by ___.”
English
1
1
3
127
Johnson Taiwo 🇬🇧
Johnson Taiwo 🇬🇧@Johnsontaiwo_·
If you’re a Data Analyst, CRM Analyst, or aspiring Marketing Analyst who wants to move from Junior into senior-level commercial impact in the next 12 weeks, read this. 👇👇 You don’t get promoted for building dashboards. You get promoted for influencing revenue. Most analysts stop at reporting: - CTR. - Conversion rate. - CPA. Senior analysts answer: Where should we scale? What should we cut? Why did revenue move? What do we do next? That’s a different level of thinking. So I built a 12-week practical roadmap designed to move you from metric reporting to commercial decision-making. No theory-heavy fluff. No passive courses. No random portfolio projects. Just 7 real-world builds using real datasets: • Campaign ROI & budget reallocation • Conversion prediction (lead scoring) • A/B testing with statistical confidence • RFM segmentation for retention strategy • Churn risk analysis • Cohort retention modelling • Marketing mix & incrementality thinking By the end, you’ll have: • 6–8 commercial case studies • A strong public portfolio • Clear KPI fluency • Interview-ready impact stories This is how you transition from “analyst” to revenue operator. If that’s your goal, reply ROADMAP, REPOST, and I’ll share it to your DM.
Johnson Taiwo 🇬🇧 tweet media
English
601
397
919
51.5K
Wofai Eyong
Wofai Eyong@phaibooboo·
I stopped posting… because I was struggling to live what I used to teach. I haven’t posted since June 2025, and I’ve thought about coming back a lot. Truth is, I didn’t go quiet because I ran out of ideas. I went quiet because I was overwhelmed at work, and embarrassed that I was “working hard” but still not delivering the way I knew I could. It looked like this: - I’d get a task and freeze because I wasn’t fully clear - Instead of asking, I’d go into “figure it out myself” mode - Hours would pass… sometimes days And then I’d feel even more behind, more ashamed, more quiet. And the painful part? It wasn’t that I lacked skill. It was that I was scared of asking “stupid” questions and speaking up. A friend said something that shifted everything for me; 'Clarity isn’t weakness, it is professionalism' It was an AHA!! moment. Now, i follow a simple rule before I start any work; i ask 2 questions 1. What do you want? 2. What does “done” look like? Take it from me, silence doesn’t protect you. It delays delivery, increases mistakes and quietly damages confidence. So I’m back, and I’m going to document this journey honestly. Not motivation. Not vibes. Practical systems. If you’re early–mid career and you’ve ever struggled silently at work, you’re not alone, and i know, we are many 😆
Wofai Eyong tweet media
English
3
2
12
489
Ola retweetledi
Aakash Gupta
Aakash Gupta@aakashgupta·
Social Capital put $10M into Groq’s seed round in April 2017 when the company was worth roughly $30M post-money. That single check bought about 33% of the company. Then they doubled down with $52.3M in a 2018 convertible note. Total deployed: $62.3M. Here’s where it gets interesting. Groq raised $300M at $1.1B in 2021, then $640M at $2.8B in 2024, then $750M at $6.9B in September 2025. Each round diluted early investors. But Social Capital had board seats and likely maintained some pro-rata through the convertible. Conservative math: They own somewhere between 15-20% of Groq today. At $20B, that’s $3B to $4B in value. $62M in. $3-4B out. That’s a 50-65x return in 8 years. For context, this single investment is worth more than Social Capital’s entire fund size in 2015 ($1.1B). One bet. Eight years. 50x. The timing is the wildest part. Chamath invested in custom AI chips in 2017, years before ChatGPT made inference compute a thing. He sat on the board until 2021, then stepped back right as the company was entering its growth phase. Now Nvidia is paying $20B in cash because they need Groq’s LPU architecture for inference at scale. Jensen is essentially writing Chamath a check for being early on the inference bottleneck. Say what you want about his SPACs. This one makes up for a lot of Clover Health bags.
Boring_Business@BoringBiz_

Chamath after making $4B from a seed investment in Groq (just announced $20B sale to NVIDIA) One of the best venture outcomes of all time

English
142
291
5.3K
1.3M
Ola
Ola@__Ola_____·
😆
Peter Girnus 🦅@gothburz

The company hired me to lead their "Agile Transformation." I don't know what Agile means. Nobody does. That's why it works. I make $425,000 a year. To move sticky notes. From left to right. On a board. The board is digital now. The sticky notes cost $80,000 in Jira licenses. Progress. Day one, I said "we need to break down silos." Everyone nodded. Silos are bad. I don't know why. But destroying them is a career. My career. I introduced "squads." Squads are teams. But disrupted. We disrupted the teams into teams. Different names. Same people. Same problems. But Agile problems now. Agile problems are strategic. A senior engineer asked what we're actually changing. I said, "The mindset." He asked what that means. I said, "It's a journey." He asked where we're going. I said, "Toward agility." He asked what agility means. I pointed at the sticky notes. They were moving left to right. That's velocity. We have velocity now. The VP of Engineering said two-week sprints don't fit their work. I said, "That's waterfall thinking." Waterfall is bad. Like silos. I don't know what waterfall is. But I know it's bad. She stopped talking. Waterfall accusations end conversations. We had a retrospective. In the retro, we discussed what went wrong. Everything went wrong. We put it on sticky notes. Then we moved the sticky notes. Into a column called "Parking Lot." The Parking Lot is where problems go to die. It's full. We don't look at it. That's agile. Velocity is up 40%. I defined velocity. I also defined the points. I also defined the stories. We're crushing it. At the things I made up. To measure. Ourselves. The CEO asked for ROI. I showed a chart. The chart went up. Charts should go up. This one did. I didn't label the Y-axis. Nobody asked. Leadership is confidence. We do standups now. Every day. We stand. For 45 minutes. Standing is agile. Sitting is waterfall. My legs hurt. But we're transforming. The transformation is now "Phase 3." Phase 1 was assessment. Phase 2 was implementation. Phase 3 is "continuous improvement." Continuous means forever. Forever means job security. I'm very secure. My contract was extended. Three more years. For "cultural impact." The culture is confused. But impacted. Agile transformation isn't about being agile. It's about transforming. Continuously. Toward more transformation. The destination is the journey. The journey is billable.

ART
0
0
0
13
Ola
Ola@__Ola_____·
😆 🤣 😂
Peter Girnus 🦅@gothburz

Last quarter I rolled out Microsoft Copilot to 4,000 employees. $30 per seat per month. $1.4 million annually. I called it "digital transformation." The board loved that phrase. They approved it in eleven minutes. No one asked what it would actually do. Including me. I told everyone it would "10x productivity." That's not a real number. But it sounds like one. HR asked how we'd measure the 10x. I said we'd "leverage analytics dashboards." They stopped asking. Three months later I checked the usage reports. 47 people had opened it. 12 had used it more than once. One of them was me. I used it to summarize an email I could have read in 30 seconds. It took 45 seconds. Plus the time it took to fix the hallucinations. But I called it a "pilot success." Success means the pilot didn't visibly fail. The CFO asked about ROI. I showed him a graph. The graph went up and to the right. It measured "AI enablement." I made that metric up. He nodded approvingly. We're "AI-enabled" now. I don't know what that means. But it's in our investor deck. A senior developer asked why we didn't use Claude or ChatGPT. I said we needed "enterprise-grade security." He asked what that meant. I said "compliance." He asked which compliance. I said "all of them." He looked skeptical. I scheduled him for a "career development conversation." He stopped asking questions. Microsoft sent a case study team. They wanted to feature us as a success story. I told them we "saved 40,000 hours." I calculated that number by multiplying employees by a number I made up. They didn't verify it. They never do. Now we're on Microsoft's website. "Global enterprise achieves 40,000 hours of productivity gains with Copilot." The CEO shared it on LinkedIn. He got 3,000 likes. He's never used Copilot. None of the executives have. We have an exemption. "Strategic focus requires minimal digital distraction." I wrote that policy. The licenses renew next month. I'm requesting an expansion. 5,000 more seats. We haven't used the first 4,000. But this time we'll "drive adoption." Adoption means mandatory training. Training means a 45-minute webinar no one watches. But completion will be tracked. Completion is a metric. Metrics go in dashboards. Dashboards go in board presentations. Board presentations get me promoted. I'll be SVP by Q3. I still don't know what Copilot does. But I know what it's for. It's for showing we're "investing in AI." Investment means spending. Spending means commitment. Commitment means we're serious about the future. The future is whatever I say it is. As long as the graph goes up and to the right.

ART
0
0
0
17
Ola retweetledi
🍂
🍂@Lovandfear·
After you get married, you’re going to meet ‘better’ people than your spouse. You’re going to meet more good-looking people; kinder and more romantic people; more intelligent and funny people. You will meet people who have in abundance what your partner lacks. The mushy and romanticized idea that your partner will be everything to you, and will satisfy all your needs and wants is idolatry. Contentment in marriage is a virtue not often spoken about. You must wake up every day appreciating everything your partner is to you, everything they have, their beauty and the things that made you marry them because if you focus on everything they don’t do well, you’ll always meet better people. Protect your heart! See their best part, and always remember that your commitment to marry is more of a duty than it is of mushy feelings. You have to stay committed even on the days you feel your spouse is no longer the best fit for you… -Buchi
🍂 tweet media
English
445
6.4K
48.3K
5.5M
Ola retweetledi
Elon Musk
Elon Musk@elonmusk·
I was CEO and Peter reported to me, so could not fire me. It was a palace coup by most (not all) of the exec team and most of the board, who were worried that my decisions were too risky. I was the largest shareholder in the company. There was nothing anyone could have done to take my shares away from me.
English
684
1.3K
32.3K
1.7M
Ola retweetledi
FUFUO SIKA NTƆ BENZ 🇬🇭
FUFUO SIKA NTƆ BENZ 🇬🇭@n_mandelaaa·
This is the best explanation i have ever seen, i know a million people have been wanting to ask this question too 😂😂
English
158
5.8K
15.4K
479.9K
Ola retweetledi
Mr. Czar
Mr. Czar@Mrczar_·
You will be tempted to show that you are doing well, but it is important you resist the urge to perform for an audience that don’t matter - and maybe isn’t even watching
English
84
6.3K
19.6K
417K
Ola retweetledi
Ricardo
Ricardo@Ric_RTP·
Elon Musk just confirmed the most INSANE IPO in history. SpaceX is going public in 2026. $1.5 TRILLION valuation. Raising $30+ billion. That's the biggest IPO ever made. Beating Saudi Aramco's $29 billion record from 2019. But here's what everyone's missing: This isn't about space tourism or Mars missions. Elon is literally about to win the entire AI race. And 99% of people have no idea how... Here's the problem killing every AI company right now: POWER. Oracle just reported earnings. They burned through $12 BILLION in one quarter building data centers. Their free cash flow? NEGATIVE $10 billion. Revenue missed estimates. Stock crashed 11%. Microsoft, Amazon, Google all scrambling to find enough electricity for AI training. The brutal math: The US generates 490 gigawatts of total power. AI is projected to need 123 gigawatts by 2035. That's a QUARTER of the entire electrical grid. Just for artificial intelligence. Goldman Sachs says AI energy demand could jump 165% by 2030. There is literally not enough power on Earth to run AI at the scale these companies are promising. Every data center needs massive cooling systems. Billions of gallons of water per year. Insane energy costs. And the infrastructure can't keep up. Elon's solution? Stop building on Earth entirely. SpaceX is building data centers in SPACE. Not a concept. Not 10 years out. Literally starting in 2026. They're upgrading Starlink V3 satellites to carry AI computing chips. Each satellite gets 24/7 solar power. No clouds. No night. No weather disruptions. No grid bottlenecks. And the insane part is that Starship can deliver 300 to 500 gigawatts of solar-powered AI satellites into orbit every single year. At 300 gigawatts per year, the AI computing power in space would exceed the entire U.S. economy's total electricity consumption within two years. Just from satellites. Processing in orbit. While Oracle is begging banks for loans to finish data centers and OpenAI is stuck in circular funding arrangements with Microsoft, Elon already owns everything: The rockets. The satellites. The launch infrastructure. The AI company (xAI). He doesn't need to ask utilities for permission. Doesn't need grid approvals from local governments. Doesn't need to build nuclear plants or wait for clean energy. He just launches. And everyone else is scrambling to catch up: Jeff Bezos sees it. Blue Origin announced they're building their own orbital data centers. Google just launched "Project Suncatcher" with plans to deploy AI satellites by 2027. Eric Schmidt, the former CEO of Google, literally BOUGHT an entire rocket company (Relativity Space) just to compete in this space. But they're all 3+ years behind Elon. SpaceX already has 6,000+ Starlink satellites in orbit. The infrastructure is built. The $30 billion from the IPO? Going straight into scaling orbital compute. SpaceX revenue is jumping from $15 billion in 2025 to $24 billion in 2026. Most of that from Starlink. Now add space-based AI infrastructure on top. Here's why this matters: Whoever controls orbital computing controls the AI revolution. And there's only ONE company on Earth with fully reusable rockets that can launch at the scale required. Jensen Huang, Nvidia's CEO, called space data centers "a dream." Translation: Nvidia is screwed if Elon actually pulls this off. Because if SpaceX succeeds, every AI company on the planet becomes Elon's customer. OpenAI needs compute? Running on SpaceX satellites. Google needs more capacity? Renting orbital infrastructure. Microsoft needs power? Paying SpaceX for launch and compute access. Elon won't just be in the AI race. He'll own the entire track everyone else is running on. The $1.5 trillion valuation sounds crazy until you realize what he's actually building. It's not a rocket company. It's the infrastructure layer for the next 50 years of computing. People calling it overvalued have no idea what's coming.
English
1K
5K
25.1K
2.9M