Gaurav Azamgarhi

Iran has gone reggae. 😭

Iran trolling Trump hard over those downed planes. 🤣

😂

"Open the Fuckin' Strait"

Swearing and throwing insults are how sore loser brats behave. Get a grip on yourself, old man! 😄

❤️Day ka Empire & ❤️Day ke Emperors Early days of e-lafdas, I had pointed out that it was never an Empire but a Hegemon who drew its legitimacy from Mughal-Maratha Treaties of 1719, 1727, 1741 & then came Abdali & the Ahadnama of 1752. Read the ugly truth of Hindavi Swaraj 👍👍

@_Rice_Cream Blocking this chu

@_Rice_Cream @samratagnimitra Don't give your personal interpretation ,you being clown of 'FICTIONAL PARSHURAM ORDER'. I can understand your pongified driven biasness.

"The only Brahmin" or "The only protector of Brahmins"? Inscriptions at Naneghat and Nasik compare Gautamiputra Satkarni to epic heroes like Rama, Keshav, and Bhima. The word 'Chandasuta' specifically translates to "descendants of the moon," signifying an affiliation with

@_Rice_Cream Didn't know farsha was gOd

@__rootX @samratagnimitra Lmao, why r u seething so much? That's the direct meaning without we having to shove words where they don't exist. Also, try to keep gods out of ur seethe shitfest if u don't wanna incur sin

@_Rice_Cream Nikal mc , time nhi h mere pe Counter karne ki jagah same bate repeat kar raha

@__rootX @samratagnimitra He is saluting Krishna & Balarama OF lunar clan not the lunar clan itself. You're the one trying hard to cope, try not to project.

@_Rice_Cream @samratagnimitra Nope! Coping and Playing Victim is characteristics of High Born farshadhari kulin pongas not of kshatriya.

@_Rice_Cream @samratagnimitra Kings doesn't include specific salutation to a lineage unless he is claiming an affinity with it . You are pissed off really .

@__rootX @samratagnimitra Y WOULDN'T he?He is saluting a god a number of gods.Krishna & Sankarshan are amongst them.He says "adoration to Krishna & Balarama, the descendants of lunar race".That's something to be expected. Same goes for comparing oneself to the great heros of the past for his martial feats

@_Rice_Cream @samratagnimitra First decide yourself what does it mean, best brahmin ,first brahmin or only brahmin ? Though, No historians support your claim that best/first brahmin.

@__rootX @samratagnimitra In the exact same way we's translate Ekabrahmana. So Eka-dhanu-dhara would mean first/best/foremost amongst archers

@_Rice_Cream The Ishkvaku dynasty of Andhra also used matronymic gotras (e.g., Madhariputra), and they are widely regarded as Kshatriyas.

@__rootX & that would fit even perfectly in case of a Brahmins using it.A Kshtriya wouldn't evr use the term "destroyer of pride of Kashatriyas". Moreover the habit of refering to oneself y a matronymic gotra is exclusively a Brahmin thing. Ur cope is real but nobody w/ a brain buys it

Claiming to "destroy the pride of Kshatriyas" was a common literary trope borrowed from the legend of Parashurama. It was a rhetorical tool for legitimacy, used by any ruler regardless of their own varna. Mahapadma Nanda proves that one does not need to be a Brahmin to claim

@_Rice_Cream @samratagnimitra In ancient epigraphy, a king doesn't include a specific, detailed salutation to a lineage unless he is claiming an affinity with it. The Naneghat inscription is a record of the Satavahana royal family's sacrifices.

@__rootX @samratagnimitra The first one is a redundant point. Calling Krishna/Balarama as Lunar born has absolutely not bearing on the descent of Satavahanas. They r praising deities not saying that they themselves r Lunar born. No protector of Brahmins here, only foremost amongst Brahmins

@_Rice_Cream @samratagnimitra By claiming to crush "the pride of Kshatriyas," Gautamiputra Satkarni was signaling that he was the only legitimate sovereign left, effectively "resetting" the political order.Nanda used the exact same rhetoric (Sarva-Kshatrantaka), yet he was famously non-Brahmin .

@_Rice_Cream @samratagnimitra If Ekabrahmana must mean "First among Brahmins," then how do we interpret the title "Eka-dhanu-dhara" (The Only Archer) given to the same king? Does it mean he was the only person who could hold a bow?

@__rootX @samratagnimitra Ekabrahnin mean best/first amongst Brahmins not protector, that's putting words where they don't exist. And the inscription is quite clear, it's crushing the pride of Kshtriya as a class not local kingdom

the title of "Destroyer of Kshatriyas." In fact, for a non-Brahmin or a "new" ruler, such a title was even more effective at signaling that the old political hierarchy had been completely dismantled.