Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Prime Minister Foob
1.3K posts
Prime Minister Foob
@_fbhm
👽 Emperor-elect of Neo Cyber Holy America 🛸 Suggestive Ardist 👾 Executive writer on season 41 of The Simpsons
💍🐶 Katılım Şubat 2025
198 Takip Edilen2.7K Takipçiler
@rhysajlucero Bad analogy.
We teach kids to bathe because germs exist. We teach religion because beliefs exist. One is measurable. The other isn’t.
English
@simonsnathank @Saengsouriyan @MidwesternSaint @farmingandJesus You failed to answer my question, conceding the argument, thank you. I’ll pray that you leave this embarrassing false religion that you can’t even pretend to defend.
English
@_fbhm @Saengsouriyan @MidwesternSaint @farmingandJesus Can the person of the Son exist outside of the Father?
English
@simonsnathank @Saengsouriyan @MidwesternSaint @farmingandJesus See here where I said “through His divine nature,” i.e. the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit are the same one being which is the Self-Existing One (I Am). Can you prove that true aseity can only apply to persons and not beings? If not you concede
x.com/_fbhm/status/2…
Prime Minister Foob@_fbhm
@simonsnathank @Saengsouriyan @MidwesternSaint @farmingandJesus No that’s not it, I just have a job is all Yes the Son has true aseity through His divine nature, as He is eternal alongside the Father and the Holy Spirit. See John 1:1 (“…the Word was with God, and the Word was God,”) and John 8:57-59 (“…before Abraham was, I am,”)
English
@_fbhm @Saengsouriyan @MidwesternSaint @farmingandJesus So the Son can exist independent of the Father?
English
@PunishedAHole @Jonwatsaiki @Urban__Tree He replied in less that 30 seconds, sounds kinda automated to me…
English
@Jonwatsaiki @_fbhm @Urban__Tree The only way to prove you are right is to prove you're not a bot, which you haven't done yet. There is literally more proof that Jesus existed than there is that you do.
English
@Jonwatsaiki @PunishedAHole @Urban__Tree Ok let’s spin off the bot thing, name ANY other historical figure from around Jesus’ era who we have firsthand historical sources for, ANY SINGLE ONE, and provide that source
English
@PunishedAHole @_fbhm @Urban__Tree it’s more sad that you have to posture. It’s okay to admit you were misled
English
@Jonwatsaiki @PunishedAHole @Urban__Tree Why would I show anything to a bot? Prove your not a bot by providing a firsthand source outside of your own twitter feed…
English
@_fbhm @PunishedAHole @Urban__Tree oh? then show me o e for Jesus. Anything outside of the new testament…
English
@Jonwatsaiki @PunishedAHole @Urban__Tree A record from 2000 years later? Really? Try again when you find an actual firsthand source
English
@PunishedAHole @_fbhm @Urban__Tree 🙄well in 2000 years there’s a chance my records will be around on a server somewhere.
English
@Jonwatsaiki @Urban__Tree Outside this tweet there’s no firsthand account you aren’t a bot
English
@Urban__Tree outside of the bias bible there’s no first hand account she lived
English
@oddity1177 @Kloinsofficial @MelloFelicia1 @kekana_sihle He says that right here in John 8:5-8, “Truly truly I say to you, before Abraham was, I am,” oh geez wait… that’s actually the opposite, Jesus claiming to be God, my bad
English
English
Everything that begins has a creator. God never began, He is the beginning and the end.
God exists outside the chain of creation; He is the source of all things, not a created being.
Kekius Maximus@Kekius_Sage
If God created everything, who created Him?
English
@simonsnathank @Saengsouriyan @MidwesternSaint @farmingandJesus And a clear reference from John, trusted by Jesus and inspired by the Holy Spirit, of the same
English
@simonsnathank @Saengsouriyan @MidwesternSaint @farmingandJesus Clear declaration from Jesus of being the eternal self-existing God, of existing in eternity with the Father and the Holy Spirit before creation.
English
@simonsnathank @Saengsouriyan @MidwesternSaint @farmingandJesus Ok perfect, how can the three share identical authority (or any other attributes) without subsisting in the same Being?
English
@_fbhm @Saengsouriyan @MidwesternSaint @farmingandJesus “In the name of” means acting in the authority of. Why does it not say “ in the name of the triune god, 3 person existing in one consubstantial being”? That would make things clear.
English
@simonsnathank @Saengsouriyan @MidwesternSaint @farmingandJesus What does the word “name” in that verse mean to you?
English
@_fbhm @Saengsouriyan @MidwesternSaint @farmingandJesus That teaches that they are 3 persons that are homoousios in one being? I don’t see it.
English
@MidwesternSaint @simonsnathank @Saengsouriyan @farmingandJesus Run back to your cage you cowardly dog
English
@simonsnathank @_fbhm @Saengsouriyan @farmingandJesus It's simple, just search for "homoousios" and it comes right up!
English
@simonsnathank @Saengsouriyan @MidwesternSaint @farmingandJesus See my previous reply:
x.com/_fbhm/status/2…
Prime Minister Foob@_fbhm
@simonsnathank @Saengsouriyan @MidwesternSaint @farmingandJesus Matthew 28:18-20 wherein Jesus commands the disciples for baptize in the name (singular) of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. See how I was able to very easily and straightforwardly answer your question? Try it out sometime!
English
@_fbhm @Saengsouriyan @MidwesternSaint @farmingandJesus Yes, now where are you getting triune God? I don’t find that in the bible.
English
@simonsnathank @Saengsouriyan @MidwesternSaint @farmingandJesus Matthew 28:18-20 wherein Jesus commands the disciples for baptize in the name (singular) of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. See how I was able to very easily and straightforwardly answer your question? Try it out sometime!
English
@_fbhm @Saengsouriyan @MidwesternSaint @farmingandJesus Are you going to show us the consubstantial triune god in the biblical texts? 🤣 you would be the first and only person to ever do it.
English
@simonsnathank @Saengsouriyan @MidwesternSaint @farmingandJesus Gospel just means good news, my definition of the Gospel is the four books Matthew, Mark, Luke and John which account for Jesus’ life, ministry, death for our salvation and resurrection defeating death. If your definition is in line with that then by all means make your point
English
@_fbhm @Saengsouriyan @MidwesternSaint @farmingandJesus Do you agree with my definition of the gospel?
English
@simonsnathank @Saengsouriyan @MidwesternSaint @farmingandJesus So you concede that my Bible contains the true Gospel? What a surprise! I’m glad you can accept the true Triune God of the Bible, three in persons and one in being! I’m glad you can accept that the Father was never man and that we men will never become gods!
English
@_fbhm @Saengsouriyan @MidwesternSaint @farmingandJesus What did he correct about the gospel? The life, death, burial and resurrection of Christ? That is the gospel according to Paul. Do you have a different definition of the gospel?
English
@hawiaancovefe @simonsnathank @Saengsouriyan @farmingandJesus He seems to believe that:
A) the Bible we have was corrupted and a corrected version was written by Joseph Smith
and B) the Bible we have and the book(s) he has are both the same Gospel
What an absolutely clownish religion, it only stands on falsehood and comfort
English
@simonsnathank @Saengsouriyan @_fbhm @farmingandJesus "no, i wont tell you how i interpret scripture, you can just read scripture" dude you are absolutely pathetic.
English