
José Domingo @itsdomingo.bsky.social
173 posts

José Domingo @itsdomingo.bsky.social
@_itsdomingo_
Comics maker & illustrator. Eisner Awards nominee 📚Adventures of a Japanese Businessman 📚Pablo & Jane and the Hot Air Contraption//Nobrow / Astiberri.







NO ES UN JUEGO INOFENSIVO. Cada vez que una empresa de IA generativa lance una feature que les permita como usuarios “recrear” cierto estilo (Disney, Pixar, Marvel, Ghibli, etc) hagan la siguiente pregunta: ¿de dónde sacaron la data de entrenamiento para que puedan generar eso?.

Today, Telegram notified all its users in Spain with this alert: Pedro Sánchez’s government is pushing dangerous new regulations that threaten your internet freedoms. Announced just yesterday, these measures could turn Spain into a surveillance state under the guise of “protection.” Here’s why they’re a red flag for free speech and privacy: 1. Ban on social media for under-16s with mandatory age verification: This isn’t just about kids—it requires platforms to use strict checks, like needing IDs or biometrics. ⚠️ Danger: It sets a precedent for tracking EVERY user’s identity, eroding anonymity and opening doors to mass data collection. What starts with minors could expand to all, stifling open discourse. 2. Personal and criminal liability for platform executives: If “illegal, hateful, or harmful” content isn’t removed fast enough, bosses face jail. ⚠️ Danger: This will force over-censorship—platforms will delete anything remotely controversial to avoid risks, silencing political dissent, journalism, and everyday opinions. Your voice could be next if it challenges the status quo. 3. Criminalizing algorithm amplification: Amplifying “harmful” content via algorithms becomes a crime. ⚠️ Danger: Governments will dictate what you see, burying opposing views and creating echo chambers controlled by the state. Free exploration of ideas? Gone—replaced by curated propaganda. 4. “Hate and polarization footprint” tracking: Platforms must monitor and report how they “fuel division.” ⚠️ Danger: Vague definitions of “hate” could label criticism of the government as divisive, leading to shutdowns or fines. This can be a tool for suppressing opposition. These aren’t safeguards; they’re steps toward total control. We’ve seen this playbook before—governments weaponizing “safety” to censor critics. On Telegram, we prioritize your privacy and freedom: strong encryption, no backdoors, and resistance to overreach. ✊ Stay vigilant, Spain. Demand transparency and fight for your rights. Share this widely—before it’s too late.






Sorry for the misunderstanding, I was addressing one of your points, not all of them. Specifically, the notion you reiterated here that “A simplistic style is easier to manipulate in terms of what you can get away with.” And as I said, Ai is already changing that where you will be able to manipulate more complex styles and get away with just as much but you seem to be caught up on the AI comparison image I shared even though that was just one example to my primary point that I find the fundamental studio Ghibli base art style (not the animation or execution) plain and uninspired. There are many art styles that are more complex and detailed than Ghibli’s that do not go all the way to the AI image example I gave that can easily satisfy all your assumptions about the benefits/need of simplicity for expression and so on, an assertion I regard as an assumption at this point because we have not seen more detailed AI art animated to its best and final results that the technology will unlock yet. Time will tell on that front. Cheers ^_^





