Negar
2.4K posts

Negar retweetledi
Negar retweetledi

YES, THE WAR AGAINST THE IRANIAN REGIME IS GOING VERY WELL
Despite the fact that the war against the Iranian regime is going very well -- it is only a few weeks old, after all, and casualties are less than when we went into Panama to capture Noriega, rescued college students in Grenada, and virtually every other military action, the voices of despair -- some real, some contrived -- are seemingly everywhere. But are they really?
First, the President's base has never been more solid, and that includes MAGA and the GOP generally. Second, the Democrats, including the Marxists and Islamists, are strongly opposed for a variety of reasons, including TDS, political exploitation, and a growing population of hate America constituencies (both homegrown and imported). They're a very loud crowd and overrepresented in the public square. Third, the Woke Reich isolationists oppose all military action and certainly any preemptive actions, even against a regime with a half-century record of killing American soldiers and citizens, and even when that regime is provably and unequivocably developing nuclear material and missiles to reach our shores (short of that, they can still explode a dirty bomb). They are ideological kindred spirits with the extremist left. Fourth, the public has been relentlessly fed negative stories and fearmongering by a nearly unanimous media and organized ops campaigns on social media. Fifth, the rising antisemitism and Israel-hatred serves as a useful tool of the Marxist-Islamist left and Woke Reich for scapegoating, claiming the President was forced in the war by the Jews. Sixth, the public cares about affordability and the military campaign is said to be a distraction (although if the operation came to an immediate halt, that issue would not disappear; indeed, it predates the military campaign). Seventh, the latest propaganda point is to blame the military operation for potentially costing the GOP the mid-term elections, should that election cycle be lost to the Democrats (although polls showed the mid-term elections to be a challenge before the military campaign). Eighth, it is easier to explain and understand military action taken after a catastrophic attack, which focuses the attention and demands a strong response. A preventive military campaign, based on explanations of threats and subject to even disingenuous debate, muddies the water for some if not many. Talk of the threats from Islamists prior to 9/11, and the need to go to war with al-Qaeda, wouldn't have galvanized the nation.
No doubt, there are other reasons.
There is constant pressure for the President to abandon the military campaign -- gas prices (which are temporarily up), claims of violating campaign promises against forever wars (this is hardly a forever war), the cost of the military campaign (of course, the cost of a nuclear Iran with thousands of ballistic missiles is incalculable), the charge that the war is illegal (it is not), that there was no imminent threat (the inexactitude with which one can precisely determine what's imminent or not is ridiculous, preemption is a better measure), and so forth. The geopolitical, economic, and national security consequences of an early or premature cessation (an off-ramp as they say) could be devastating. Few Presidents would seek a ceasefire and precipitous end under present-day circumstances. It would be stunningly unwise. The Iranian regime would have enough power as a police-state to continue on and rebuild, both domestically and internationally, and with the help of countries like China, Russia, and North Korea. It would be the biggest gift to the Axis of Evil imaginable, and a disaster for our national security.
Opposition to nearly all military campaigns is a given, as history demonstrates. But let me suggest that in the current situation, much of it is politically partisan, ideological, emotional, contrived, and unwarranted. In each case, it is important to discern who is in opposition (both individuals and groups) and their motivations. Of course, they will claim good intentions and love of country. No doubt, some are. But for too many, that obviously is not the case. It is more sinister than not.
In the end, victory has endless benefits, including political. And here, victory is the elimination of the current threat against us and our allies in the region, and the people of Iran. The opponents in our country want everything done yesterday, even though they wanted nothing militarily done at all in the first place. They had no and have no strategy as their previous approaches -- appeasement, massive payoffs, and the lifting of sanctions -- did nothing but further empower the regime.
This is not intended to be a comprehensive review. More later.
English

Spotlighting Denis Villeneuve for #FrancophonieMonth, named Filmmaker of the Decade by Hollywood Critics in 2019. From Dune to Blade Runner 2049, he’s redefining modern cinema. He is also set to be the first Canadian to direct a James Bond movie. What's your top Villeneuve film?

English
Negar retweetledi
Negar retweetledi

Exactly right.
As Crown Prince @PahlaviReza said, what we ask of America now is simple: Stay the course.
Do not throw this crumbling regime a lifeline, pave the way for the Iranian people to finish the job.
Mark R. Levin@marklevinshow
Stay the course
English
Negar retweetledi

THOUSANDS of real American patriots and freedom-loving Iranians flooded Washington DC today to back Trump's bold strikes on the Iran regime!
Crowds chanted "Thank you Trump!" "USA USA!" "Islamic Regime Must Go!" and "Long Live the King!" for Reza Pahlavi as the leader of a free Iran.
Fake news media buried this massive show of support - just like they always do when it doesn't fit their anti-Trump lies.
Trump's doing what weak leaders never had the guts for. The people see it. The regime's days are numbered - and America First is winning big.
English


@filmstofilms_ 1. Jaws
2. Close Encounters of the Third Kind
3. Schindler's List
English
Negar retweetledi



















