M∆V

trutab.com/tabs/ Quote of the day: Do not let anyone project their fears and nastiness upon you. Guard your energy and mental space, your reality depends on it.

When you don’t vote, you are indirectly voting for who you do not want. Get your PVC!

I spent the weekend pondering how the author of Hebrews would treat Mary. I came out convinced he would place Sarah above her. Hear me out. The entire New Testament has an anti-rivalry architecture built into it. John the Baptist names it plainly: “He must increase, I must decrease.” From the Baptist to Hebrews, Scripture systematically prevents covenant servants from stabilizing into independent axes of glory beside the Son. The writer of Hebrews does not demote Abraham or Moses. He follows the logic of their greatness to where it actually terminates, showing his congregation that the endpoint was always Christ. He disputes the theology being extracted from these figures, not the figures themselves. That is the method, and when you apply it to Mary, something remarkable happens. Now, God spent two thousand years preparing Israel’s theological imagination for a virgin conception. He used the same method he used to prepare Abraham for the resurrection: he made them live inside smaller versions of the miracle first. God demanded Isaac on the mountain because He was teaching Abraham how to read a cosmic script that hadn't been fully written yet. Hebrews tells us that Abraham "reasoned" that God could raise people from the dead, from which he received Isaac back as a type. He had to believe in the resurrection of a dead son before the historical Resurrection ever occurred. God did the same thing with the womb. When the promise of a son first came to Abraham and Sarah, Sarah didn’t bow her head in worship; she laughed. It was the bitter, protective laugh of human realism; she was barren and post-menopausal, and she knew biology had issued its final verdict. So God spent the next two thousand years systematically curing that laugh. He overrules Sarah's dead womb, and Isaac arrives. Then Rebekah. Then Rachel. Then Hannah. Then Elizabeth, a Sarah-level repetition placed immediately before Mary as a final dress rehearsal. When Gabriel appears in Nazareth, he does not ask Mary to leap into a void or believe something unprecedented. He simply points her to the family history and hands her the roadmap: “Even Elizabeth, your relative, has conceived in her old age.” God escalates the impossibility across two millennia, starting with biology interrupted and ending with the total bypassing of natural human generation. He was doing something deeper than building a cold theological framework; He was slowly wearing down human cynicism, case by case, womb by womb, stretching the soul of the covenant community until a young girl could look at a biological impossibility and see it not as a terrifying violation of reality, but as the next line in a song her family had been singing for generations. Within this framework, Sarah’s faith required a far heavier cognitive lift than Mary’s. Sarah had no precedent. When the promise came to her, a dead womb bearing life was an absolute blank space in human history. She did not inherit a theological category. She had to pioneer it out of nothing, against a biological verdict that had never been overturned. Mary’s faith is the magnificent, unmatched climax of the sequence. But Sarah’s faith was the foundation that carved open the frontier. The writer of Hebrews honors people according to the pioneering weight of what they believed under conditions of zero visible precedent: Abel, Enoch, Noah, and Abraham. By that internal logic, Sarah holds structural priority. Now look at the architecture of the house itself. The theology that exalts Mary argues that a royal son requires a Queen Mother, claiming Mary’s maternal relationship to the King generates a queenly office. Hebrews dismantles this domestic literalism by defining the house precisely: “and we are his house.” The house is the covenant people, not an earthly royal family unit. If this house has a structural mother, the New Testament canon has already assigned that role explicitly. Paul writes in Galatians 4:26: “The Jerusalem above is free, and she is our mother.” The free woman, the covenant line, the mother of the house of faith, is Sarah’s line. Mary is not the mother of the house; she is the ultimate, glorious daughter of Sarah’s house, inheriting the promise rather than originating it. That is not a diminishment. That is Paul. Apply Hebrews 10:5 to this, and the argument closes: “A body you prepared for me.” The writer quotes Psalm 40 to show that the entire Levitical sacrificial system pointed toward one event: God preparing a body through which the final, unrepeatable sacrifice could be made. The grammar is non-negotiable. God is the subject. The body is the object. Mary is not the agent but the site. To be the place where God did what centuries of animal sacrifice could not is an extraordinary, unmatched honor. But Hebrews assigns the verb to God. Every elevated 'Marian' title like Co-redemptrix, Perpetual Intercessor, or Mediatrix, is an attempt to give her the verb that Hebrews assigned elsewhere. These titles do not honor Mary; they transform a climactic human participant into an independent metaphysical center, which is precisely the theological mistake the letter was written to correct. Jesus made this correction himself. He did it about Abraham, the founding Father: “Before Abraham was, I am.” He did it about David: “If David called him Lord, how is he his son?” Both times, the logic is identical; he tells them, "You are not wrong about the relationship, but you are holding it too literally, and it is costing you". The lineage is real, even the fatherhood, but the category they generate is insufficient. Then in Luke 11:27, a woman calls from the crowd, “Blessed is the womb that bore you and the breasts that nursed you.” Jesus responds immediately: “Blessed rather are those who hear the word of God and keep it.” He does not deny Mary; he identifies the actual source of her blessedness. Her honor was never the womb, but her honor was in the faith. That is her fiat. That is her 'Sarah-qualification'. He refuses to let the biological fact become the theological category, exactly as he did with Abraham and David. There is also an asymmetry inside these elevated traditions that I haven't really seen people name directly. It implicitly treats Mary's physical, biological relationship to Christ as more structurally significant to the redemptive story than the entire legal, covenantal line that preceded her. But the biblical covenant chain runs decisively through the fathers of the faith. Abraham’s faith generates the entire legal line. His willingness at Moriah, which trained a nation’s imagination for the cross, is structurally constitutive of everything that follows. If that diligence across decades of silence and that agonizing obedience at the altar do not generate a mediatorial office for Abraham, on what biblical grounds does Mary’s physical hosting of the incarnation generate one? Her consent is tangible, and it matters. But within the text, consent to host the promise does not equal an office to mediate it. Mary’s own words close the argument: “He has looked on the humble estate of his servant.” She does not claim the verb; she names herself accurately. The blessing that follows her through all generations flows from what passed through her, not what originated in her. Her own famous song of praise in Luke is not the speech of a queen. It is the worship of the most honored servant in the history of the house. The Hebrews framework does not produce a low view of Mary. It produces the highest view the text can sustain. She sits in the hall of faith, in the Sarah section, as the culmination of the faith-enabled conception thread running through the entire covenant story. She is the site of God’s most decisive preparatory act in human history. She is, as Hebrew's logic demands, the most glorious daughter the house of Sarah ever produced. She is blessed among women and blessed through all generations. But the house belongs to the Son. God prepared the body. Mary, by faith, received what she could not produce. You do not honor the relay runners by pretending they ran the whole race. You honor them by understanding what they actually carried, how long the road was before they received the baton, and where the race was always going.

I used to be ambivalent about "Eat the Rich" ideologies and thought they were just humorous until 1998, the day Abacha died. I was at Apongbon in Lagos, driving a second-hand Mercedes E-Class, and behind a guy being mugged by rioters and waiting for my turn. I had never known a fear as bad as that since I was born. The guy in front of me was stabbed and bludgeoned simply for driving a nice car. My car behind his own was nicer. I had to do two things: come out of the car and run, or run through the guys. I saw an opening on the side and rammed through. They panicked when they saw me coming, and I could somehow weave my way into Marina. I stopped at the UBA building, where armed guards were posted, for a while before making my way back to Ikoyi against oncoming traffic. It was a chaotic day, and I survived meaningless mayhem. Abacha was a dictator; everyone was afraid of him, including the rich guys. The rich guys were even more afraid of him as he seized their companies and took their wealth. He even murdered people like Kudirat Abiola, and his goons once attacked Olorogun Michael Ibru. I didn't understand why poor people who were celebrating his death were attacking those who also suffered from his tyranny. This is the part of human behavior that scares me the most. When people are in pain, they go after convenient enemies rather than their true adversaries. The guy who was being attacked at Apongbon in front of me was a middle-class guy going back home from work. He had nothing to do with Abacha's tyranny. He almost paid for it with his life because he was an easy target. This is why I believe it when they say that "Eat the Rich" is a myth. The poor will feast on the middle class first, while the rich escape. The poor are also likely to be weaponized by their truly wealthy adversaries to prevent the middle class from ever aspiring to become as rich as they are. Yes, Femi Otedola and Dangote are very rich, but they are openly doing things that benefit the economy. Those you should fear and those whom people never see are those who are not doing anything to help the average person, but are weaponizing them to hate others. I see Femi, Aliko, and even Tony more as hostages. They were wealthy before the current crop of politicians came into power and will likely remain so when this regime has done its time. I admit that they have a lot of flaws, but they are playing a survival game just like us, and people are attacking them like the mob at Apongbon. These men are not raising money through government corruption but through institutions like Afrexim and others to build infrastructure that would benefit all of us and also keep them rich. That is the beauty of capitalism. They provide the platforms for others like them to build even better entities. I didn't know how scared the rich in Africa were of bad government actors until I tried to raise a VC fund from local LPs in 2018. None of these guys had their liquid wealth in Africa. They kept the assets in safe havens where the governments could not impound them, as Abacha did in his time. If you want to eat the rich, I can guarantee you that the corrupt politicians are tastier than the rich capitalists.

@vfsglobalcare Thanks. A recent attempt has been successful.

Dear Customer, we understand your concern. It appears that the system is currently experiencing a rate limit issue. We request you to try again after 3 hours. If the problem persists, it would be helpful if you could share the location of the Visa Application Center, the country you intend to visit, the URL, your contact details (full name, phone number, and email address), and some additional details pertaining to your application through a direct message so that we can assist you further.

@vfsglobalcare Hello, Your website keeps showing me this response when I try to sign in and book my visa interview appointment. I’ve made payment and submitted the visa application, and for the past few days I am unable to schedule the appointment.

3 weeks ago, my @Starlink dish that I’ve been using for the past 3 years suddenly went offline. I messaged support and they said it was damaged beyond repair. Before I could ask what next, they asked me to confirm my delivery address and they sent me a free replacement device with one month free subscription at zero cost to me. I come dey imagine say na Nigerian business. Make I hear say your MTN router spoil and them replace am free of charge with free one month subscription 😂😂😂 This is why @elonmusk is a successful businessman. He knows how to retain the customer.

I studied political science as a minor in the university and this was one of the books that we read and referenced in one of the courses. Initially as young chaps this book infuriated us and we began to blame the west for our woes until we came across another book “How Africa Underdeveloped Africa”. Till date, I have no blames or fight with the Europeans. The time for blaming them is long gone. Now it is our evil leaders who are constantly looting and ravaging the continent. Sometimes I wonder if there’s really a problem with the black race because how can a whole continent have wicked leaders? Only the “white” part of the continent have major developments. Africans, it is your leaders that have ravaged you, not Europeans.

Shettima cried like a baby on TV, blamed GEJ for every corpse and attacks in his states. Tinubu clocks 3 years, situation has worsened Now suddenly it’s “governors’ responsibility.” Shameless, spineless, forgetful liars. Nigerians have the receipts.

It cost $0.00 to retweet this

I challenge every influencer and everyone on this space to speak on INSECURITY today. The country is getting worse by the day. Spare a tweet. Use your voice.

Hello @LCFC I’m Olaogun, a winger also played as a striker from Nigeria. I’ve spent the last 3 years training daily to get one shot at professional football. I’m not asking for a contract. I’m asking for 7 days on trial to show you what I can do. If I’m not good enough, I’ll walk away with no hard feelings. I’m fast, direct, and I work harder than anyone on the pitch. My highlights are here: @Olaogun9" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">youtube.com/@Olaogun9 Thanks, Olaogun |

@NostalgicVibeNG Bold of you to think he bought it with his money.

So this guy stared at his bank account, counted from 1 to ₦100 million, and still didn’t know what to do with the money. Then he thought to himself : 'Let me just flush it on APC’s presidential ticket' fully aware he doesn’t stand a chance.We all know this was pure script. A badly acted script to add fake hype to today’s sham APC primary. Nobody is buying this nonsense so y'all can keep fooling yourselves

This guy!!!

@Donjaytrix001 😂😂😂😂😂

Marrying your best friend only sounds cute on paper In real life??? You will shed hot tears Your wife is not your friend oooo

Ambulance Vs. Campaign buses

Apart from the absurdity and demonic degeneracy of the claim itself, this exposes a deeper theological problem. The reasoning implicitly normalizes male lust as something primarily managed through external regulation rather than internal moral responsibility. In the Sermon on the Mount, Jesus radically internalizes sin. He does not say, “If someone causes you to lust, they are guilty.” He says, “If YOU look lustfully, YOU have sinned.” The burden is placed first on the heart, the eyes, the will of the individual. That is why Christ says, “If your right eye causes you to sin, pluck it out.” The problem begins within. Moral failure is not outsourced onto other people’s clothing, appearance, or existence. By contrast, this kind of reasoning creates a framework where responsibility is continually externalized: Women must veil so men do not lust, men must grow beards so other men are not tempted, society must endlessly regulate appearances because self-control is treated as secondary. Christianity addresses desire at the root. It confronts the human heart itself rather than building an ever-expanding system of external restrictions to compensate for it.

Your brain has a circuit that doesn't know you live in a city. Its only job is to monitor whether birds are still singing. When they stop, something dangerous is nearby. When they continue, the coast is clear. This wiring predates primates. These kids are being sedated by the oldest safety signal in the mammalian nervous system. The Max Planck Institute tested this in 2022 with 295 participants. Six minutes of birdsong reduced anxiety and paranoia with medium effect sizes. Six minutes of traffic noise increased depression by the same margin. The effect worked on people who had never left dense urban environments. Their bodies responded to a signal their conscious minds had never learned. King's College London ran a larger study. 1,292 participants, real-time mood tracking through a phone app, 26,856 assessments over three years. Hearing or seeing birds improved mental wellbeing for up to eight hours afterward. The effect held for people diagnosed with depression. Trees, plants, and waterways didn't explain it. The birds themselves were the variable. Now here's where Italy connects to Finland. 95% of parents in the Finnish city of Oulu let their babies nap outside starting at two weeks old. A 2008 study confirmed the children took longer, deeper naps outdoors. Parents reported letting them sleep in temperatures as low as -15°C. 66% said their babies were more active afterward compared to indoor naps. The practice started as a public health initiative from Nordic maternity clinics in the early 1900s and became cultural infrastructure. The Italian kindergarten in this video is running the same program the Nordic countries have been running for a century. Outdoor naps, natural soundscapes, no white noise machines, no blackout curtains. Meanwhile, American kindergartens have been eliminating nap time entirely to squeeze in more instruction. A UMass study showed that children who skipped naps forgot 12% of what they learned that morning. The nap itself was the learning. The irony is that the countries spending the least on sleep technology for children are producing the best sleep outcomes. No sound machines. No apps. Just birds.

Convince me that a chair came into existence without a mind.

God made men. God made women. Men cannot be women. Women cannot be men. Glad we cleared this up.

Now now, Peter Obi donated another N10 million Naira for the rebuilding of a nursery school destroyed by fire. You see why we rate Atiku ahead of that Agulu trader in politics... Atiku doesn't have time for all these stupid educational interventions. But when you meets him in party primaries, he'll beat the person to stupor. Instead of building a structure for party politics, Obi is busy squandering money on public health, education and empowerment. Rubbish.