Adam Hull

@LeninVlad420 @JLRThe_Resource @ComicDaveSmith @grok Bill Gates, Mark Zuckerberg, Steve Jobs (when he was alive, of course)

@JLRThe_Resource @ComicDaveSmith @grok But you didn’t answer my question. Who is in power in any facet of society, that is uneducated?

Look at the responses, retard. No one is with you.

@Dawgs_2112 @KosherRedPill @AuronMacintyre It’s not even Israel….God is speaking to Abraham

@KosherRedPill @AuronMacintyre Surely you don’t think the Israel in Genesis 12:3 is synonymous with Israel today?

This is going to come as a shock to many establishment conservatives but the Civil Rights Act and our non-existent treaty with Israel are not scripture You are not following the word of God, you just have a political agenda

@JoelWBerry @CBHeresy

The real reason people like me and @JoelWBerry have been hard on the schizo Right post-Kirk is because they’ve taken our eyes off the real enemy (the Left) by making everything about Israel. We didn’t start this circus, but we will shut it down.

1. This is shameless 'like' fishing. It's not a serious thought, nor even pretending to be one. And sadly, Sey took it from any one of a hundred million zog-bots on X who repeat this 25 times a day because they're programmed to do so, and tried to smuggle it as something worthy of an actual human brain. 2. The unspoken presupposition is that criticism of someone equals hatred. This isn't the Christian thought process. This is Queer logic. It's pagan reasoning. There's nothing different between this and a leftist claiming that criticism of George Floyd means you hate black people. It is sub-intellectual. This is the thought process of a 19 year-old girl in a freshman-level sociology course who's become convinced that opposing feminism means you hate women. 3. Repeating "Jewish" over and over again is a nifty rhetorical device common among the lowest-tier of Christian influence-grifter that is *always* followed by utter lack of anything resembling exegesis. Whenever you see an evangelical influencer start to get all Jewy, it's sad, because you know that it never brings out the type of serious Biblical discussion worthy of an exegete. Give them time, and they'll begin to repeat the most cognitively bereft, vapid sloganeering known to man. God wants more from us than this.

@NHArt32 @LostMyHats Verse 10 would disagree, but ok

@a9h2015 @LostMyHats Ok see ya. Here is the proof 1 Peter is addressed to believing Jews:

More and more Christians are becoming vocal about the Neo-Judaizing heresy and the dangers of Jewish Supremacy. There is one Holy Nation. There is one Special People. There is one Covenant. “There is neither Jew nor Greek… you are all one in Christ Jesus. And if you are Christ’s, then you are Abraham’s offspring, heirs according to promise” (Galatians 3.28-29.

@DissidentClint @Nero I chuckled

@Nero Christians don’t do this kind of thing, Milo. And it’s not funny.

yikes

@NHArt32 @LostMyHats cool. Have a good day

Actually you do say it. You said now go to 1 Peter 2:9 to see who is truly special, the implicatiom being Israel is by comparison not truly special (ironically the author is addressing remnant Israel there). You also attempted to use Deut 9:4-7 to prove they are not special, when in fact Deut 9:4-7 actually perfectly proves what I've been saying these two days, that Israel receives the blessing of the land in spite of their unrighteous stiff necked behavior

@NHArt32 @LostMyHats You accuse me of saying something I didn’t. I point out that I didn’t say it. And then you point to another guy who said it which essentially means I said it too? This has become boring to me. I’m out. Have a god day.

@a9h2015 @LostMyHats 1 we are on JDs thread whose whole point is to say they are not special and you are supporting him. This guy at least knows whats really going on here:

@NHArt32 @LostMyHats Sigh……find a single response where I said they weren’t special. Then, read Deuteronomy 9:4-7. Then, have a look at 1 Peter 2:9 to see who is truly special.

Regarding the claim you made that I skip books of the Bible. This is not only incorrect, but also ironic as the chapter you selected from Deuteronomy is taken out of context from the book that defeats your most basic underlying claim of this whole discussion which is your claim that Israel is not special. Yet the very context being set in this book is that Israel is very special and will be held to a higher standard accordingly. You seem to have skipped over ch 26:

@NHArt32 @LostMyHats It literally says “the” lol

@NHArt32 @CalkinsDan @LostMyHats Yeah it does

@a9h2015 @CalkinsDan @LostMyHats Scripture says so:

@NHArt32 @CalkinsDan @LostMyHats Make it about me? Lol, my goodness

@a9h2015 @CalkinsDan @LostMyHats Verse 28 dwell in the land that I gave to your fathers. You can't detach that from the passage. That is a clear reference to v 24 bring Israel back into their own land. Verse 32 oh House of Israel. You can try to make that about you, but it just isn't, it's about Israel:

@NHArt32 @CalkinsDan @LostMyHats I literally said the promises made to Abraham WERE ALSO made to Christ. Ezekiel prophesied DURING the captivity events that would happen. And they did. Are you okay? And yes, you do.

No, it says promised were made to Abraham AND to Christ. And also no Ezekiel being written during captivity does not preclude it from containing prophecy. I do not contradict Amos, you do. Your rendition changes the promise from permanently planting them in their land, to impermanently planting them.

@NHArt32 @CalkinsDan @LostMyHats If you say so

@a9h2015 @CalkinsDan @LostMyHats Ya and clearly it is prophetic looking past Babylon because it shows a time "in the latter days" when they will fear/seek the Lord. Clearly they were not seeking the Lord at Jesus 1st advent, so this is describing a time still yet in the future.

@NHArt32 @CalkinsDan @LostMyHats It was future to Ezekiel. And it has happened, to believers in Christ.

Ez 36:24 is a future looking prophecy beyond that clearly as verse 25 begins with the chronological indicator "Then" and it goes on to describe the time when God will put a new heart in them/make them holy. That hasn't happened yet clearly or you wouldn't be pointing out their current unholy behavior. Ez 36 is prophetic.

@NHArt32 @CalkinsDan @LostMyHats The promises made to Abraham were also made to Christ. Galatians 3:16 Duet 28 - incorrect. Ezek was written during the Babylonian exile and the people who came back were stirred by God’s Spirit to return. Your interpretation of Amos contradicts what God said.

Gen 12:3 shows no condition placed in the gifting. Gal 3:17-18 Paul affirms that. Duet 28 showe conditions on use, Ez 36 shows Father choosing to show mercy by bringing them back in while they are in unbelief. Amos 9 shows that a point in the future they will be permanently planted.

@NHArt32 @CalkinsDan @LostMyHats Lol, this was written roughly 150 years before the Babylonian exile.

@a9h2015 @CalkinsDan @LostMyHats It actually ignores most of Scripture and comes up with an entirely different story.

@NHArt32 @CalkinsDan @LostMyHats That was written before this: “Then the heads of fathers’ households of Judah and Benjamin and the priests and the Levites arose, even everyone whose spirit God had stirred to go up and rebuild the house of the Lord which is in Jerusalem.” Ezra 1:5

@a9h2015 @CalkinsDan @LostMyHats In Ezekiel 36 we see Father gathering Israel into their land, while they are in unbelief. So clearly unbelief is not a permanent block against Israel having access to the land.

@NHArt32 @CalkinsDan @LostMyHats Show me where God says He will let them use the land vs giving them the land.

Why is it difficult for you to understand the difference between ownership and use? You've never heard of a parent grounding a child? Clearly Israel was in disobedience well before Amos is written, so if they permanently lost the land due to their disobedience then Father would not be discussing there in Amos a timr when He is going to permanently plant them in that same land.

@NHArt32 @CalkinsDan @LostMyHats My hermeneutic doesn’t ignore entire chapters of scripture. Lol

@a9h2015 @CalkinsDan @LostMyHats Lol you're hermeneutic doubts God when He says He will plant them never again to be uprooted. God said it, He will do it.