@SaebHalbouni@JZAK07@SPQRatel@Chartguy888@PissedOffCAD@iluminatibot Jesus claims to be God all over the Gospels. His followers went on to teach his divinity. Judaism understood He was claiming to be divine; he didn’t correct them and was killed for it. Then He rose from the dead. Study Christianity, it came first.
This man went to court for fishing without a license and resisting arrest.
Straight up owns this judge.
I admire his ability and will to stand up for himself and for his God-given rights.
@aLilBirdtoldya@LocustReport@iluminatibot That's what they do. If they can't beat you into submission they label you crazy so that the domesticated tools write them off and don't dare question anything. Use your brain.
@THAEDLIGHT@iluminatibot More people may agree from this sample who follows this account and took the time to click the vid, but on the whole I bet not. And my comment has a good number of likes…. But who cares? And I’m def not a liberal, can’t stand liberal ideologies
@aLilBirdtoldya@iluminatibot According to the comments, more people agree with this man than with your statement, and it sounds like a self-description of liberals, but that’s a whole other story.
@SANDMAN19701@iluminatibot He suffered the court’s ruling, he wasn’t exempt from it just because he said it was fictitious. He may have valid points, but the way he expressed them sounded wild and childish imo, and it didn’t serve to convince anyone and it didn’t help his case. That’s all I’m saying
@aLilBirdtoldya@iluminatibot You keep saying he lost the case. Do you even know what you're saying? He is not responsible for the fictitious character that they created, nor is he responsible for any bullshit outcome that a Corporational court of legality, not law made against him, the living man!🤦😴
@goldageemperor@iluminatibot He did nothing to change his status as “slave,” just made himself more of one by submitting to his anger and incurring extra penalties.
@torus_ouroboros@iluminatibot He lost the case, made himself look unstable and immature, and added extra penalties. Fight the system in ways that make sense, adjust according to the situation. Speak the truth when people listen, don’t waste your pearls on swine. Guy just sounds like an angry kid
@aLilBirdtoldya@iluminatibot Bro sounds like a real man of the land and defender of freedom, knows his rights and doesnt let fear pacify him to a statist and wearer of the cloak of Saturn. All respect to him.
@LocustReport@iluminatibot He may have a point but lost the case, made himself look unstable, and incurred extra penalties. Guy just sounds angry and disrespectful
@aLilBirdtoldya@iluminatibot I dunno. When he said “I am not your corporate fiction.” That carries weight. I immediately understood what I first perceived as insanity. Or a mental illness. Was in fact a deeply felt conviction in his own liberty. He can fish to eat as the fish eat, and the birds, and animals.
@GhostOfGoldberg@iluminatibot He lost the case, made himself look unstable and immature, and added extra penalties. Fight the system in ways that make sense, adjust according to the situation. Speak the truth when people listen, don’t waste your pearls on swine. Guy sounds like an angry kid
@aLilBirdtoldya@iluminatibot The real lunatics are the people like you, who make excuses for our overlords who think they own everything in the natural world, including us.
“Just pay for the license to do the thing people have done since the beginning of time! What’s the big deal?” Fuck off, stupid goy.
@Moazzam87723103@iluminatibot Because he lost the case and did nothing to help his situation. Fight the system in ways that make sense and don’t make you look like a dummy
Court Outcome
• Sovereign citizen-style arguments failed: Tertelgte claimed he was a “natural man,” not a “federal citizen” or “corporate fiction,” and rejected the court’s jurisdiction. He challenged the judge, questioned the flag, and refused to comply (e.g., keeping his hat on).
• The judge repeatedly held him in contempt of court. He was removed from the proceedings.
• He spent weeks in jail, including a specific 30-day sentence for contempt (refusing to remove his hat).
• A jury convicted him on the obstruction and resisting charges. The fishing violation and related penalties stood. @grok
These “not subject to the court” tactics (often called sovereign citizen arguments) almost never succeed in U.S. courts and frequently lead to additional contempt charges or harsher outcomes. The video is an edited clip highlighting his defiant moments, but it doesn’t show the full resolution. Similar older videos have circulated for years on platforms like YouTube.
Court Outcome (grok)
• Sovereign citizen-style arguments failed: Tertelgte claimed he was a “natural man,” not a “federal citizen” or “corporate fiction,” and rejected the court’s jurisdiction. He challenged the judge, questioned the flag, and refused to comply (e.g., keeping his hat on).
• The judge repeatedly held him in contempt of court. He was removed from the proceedings.
• He spent weeks in jail, including a specific 30-day sentence for contempt (refusing to remove his hat).
• A jury convicted him on the obstruction and resisting charges. The fishing violation and related penalties stood. @grok
These “not subject to the court” tactics (often called sovereign citizen arguments) almost never succeed in U.S. courts and frequently lead to additional contempt charges or harsher outcomes. The video is an edited clip highlighting his defiant moments, but it doesn’t show the full resolution. Similar older videos have circulated for years on platforms like YouTube.
Court Outcome
• Sovereign citizen-style arguments failed: Tertelgte claimed he was a “natural man,” not a “federal citizen” or “corporate fiction,” and rejected the court’s jurisdiction. He challenged the judge, questioned the flag, and refused to comply (e.g., keeping his hat on).
• The judge repeatedly held him in contempt of court. He was removed from the proceedings.
• He spent weeks in jail, including a specific 30-day sentence for contempt (refusing to remove his hat).
• A jury convicted him on the obstruction and resisting charges. The fishing violation and related penalties stood. @grok
These “not subject to the court” tactics (often called sovereign citizen arguments) almost never succeed in U.S. courts and frequently lead to additional contempt charges or harsher outcomes. The video is an edited clip highlighting his defiant moments, but it doesn’t show the full resolution. Similar older videos have circulated for years on platforms like YouTube.
Court Outcome
• Sovereign citizen-style arguments failed: Tertelgte claimed he was a “natural man,” not a “federal citizen” or “corporate fiction,” and rejected the court’s jurisdiction. He challenged the judge, questioned the flag, and refused to comply (e.g., keeping his hat on).
• The judge repeatedly held him in contempt of court. He was removed from the proceedings.
• He spent weeks in jail, including a specific 30-day sentence for contempt (refusing to remove his hat).
• A jury convicted him on the obstruction and resisting charges. The fishing violation and related penalties stood. @grok
These “not subject to the court” tactics (often called sovereign citizen arguments) almost never succeed in U.S. courts and frequently lead to additional contempt charges or harsher outcomes. The video is an edited clip highlighting his defiant moments, but it doesn’t show the full resolution. Similar older videos have circulated for years on platforms like YouTube.