Abdulbee

The only way to be sure you have an ulcer is for a doctor to take a small camera and check the inside of your stomach. If it's not that, what you're doing is guess work. First question; How do you know it is ULCER?

I feel the parties arguing about this are being kinda superficial about the post Dr. Chinonso is right in general. By calling it "guesswork", I assume he's referring to making a definitive diagnosis. For example, diagnostically, H. Pylori tests make a proxy-based assumption; you are treating a suspected ulcer rather than a visually proven one. The interesting thing is that the PPV of H. pylori test for diagnosing a peptic ulcer in the presence of dyspeptic symptoms is around 15-30%. And that's because over 80% of carriers of H. pylori infection are actually asymptomatic. However, Statistically and procedurally, treating based on H pylori test results and clinical presentation is NOT guesswork; it is highly regulated, evidence-based risk management.

No one is disputing the fact that Endoscopy is the Gold Standard.💯 The debate here is, IN NIGERIA, do y'all follow that practice??? Who're y'all kidding???😂

The only way to be sure you have an ulcer is for a doctor to take a small camera and check the inside of your stomach. If it's not that, what you're doing is guess work. First question; How do you know it is ULCER?

Imagine being the only person with access to GPT 5.5 / Claude 4.7 in 2012.

An update on the April 13 Hyperbridge Token Gateway exploit. Our initial loss estimate of approximately $237K has been revised upward to approximately $2.5M, with most of the increase reflecting losses from incentive pools across Ethereum, Base, BNB Chain, and Arbitrum.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think the total attack-side value was ≈ $272K (ie, realized $272K via Tornado + $49 on-wallet) . The remaining $2.26M to Hyperbridge's $2.5M figure is not sitting in the attack wallets. That confirms the gap is almost certainly victim-side accounting, Hyperbridge counting what they need to replace in incentive pools, not what the attacker actually pocketed. So, the revised $2.5M is a protocol-loss measure, not just the attacker-proceeds measure.

An update on the April 13 Hyperbridge Token Gateway exploit. Our initial loss estimate of approximately $237K has been revised upward to approximately $2.5M, with most of the increase reflecting losses from incentive pools across Ethereum, Base, BNB Chain, and Arbitrum.