abipup
94 posts


@pottedthings @quasicypher1 Yes but did they have a separate vote on what each individual letter of the name should be?
English

Thoroughly upset at this news
Cincinnati Zoo@CincinnatiZoo
More than 36,000 people voted (in less than 24 hours) on the name for the baby sloth. Say hello to Juno!
English

@_ndigo @gakonst @msolomon44 dude there's a cabal of coders out here absolutely pumping out utility for the blockchain
I see you
English

This whole process should ideally be internalized into Forge as a cheatcode, using a rust sdk to interface with the Safe API. But this is a decent solution for now.
cc @gakonst @msolomon44
English

Introducing forge-safe, a Safe transaction builder using Forge scripting.
github.com/ind-igo/forge-…
With this, you can now build and version control a sequence of transactions for your multisig as a Forge script, and submit it for later signing on the Safe ui.
English

@zeetientien @0xJala @Ov3rKoalafied @pottedthings (I still stand by that the only way 0.5% doesn't make it to snapshot is if "Do not proceed" wins the RFC vote)
English

@zeetientien @0xJala @Ov3rKoalafied @pottedthings Let's say we removed 0.5% from the snapshot (which violates the OIP -> snapshot process), if the will of OHM is 0.5% then without that option the snapshot would be voted down until it was brought back
English

Were you hoping to see a massive drop in the market cap of $OHM a year from now? You’re in luck!
OlympusDAO |Smart, Money|@OlympusDAO
We have 4 important proposals currently up for a vote on snapshot! Go vote today: snapshot.org/#/olympusdao.e…
English

@zeetientien @0xJala @Ov3rKoalafied @pottedthings At the end of the day, we can agree that the governance process does need improvement. More specifics on how to proceed from RFC->OIP->snap on these complex votes.
English

@zeetientien @0xJala @Ov3rKoalafied @pottedthings Nic wrote it, why didn't you ask him to add a poll? I'm ambivalent to having a second one because the RFC one was conclusive and requested changes were all made to TAP from my POV. Seems it was important to you though
English

@pottedthings @zeetientien @0xJala @Ov3rKoalafied Yeah, one flaw with the forum is that we as voters can't be very specific on what all alterations to make. I guess it's clear to some that "alterations" means "remove current option." Others think it means "provide more options"
English

@abipup_33 @zeetientien @0xJala @Ov3rKoalafied So the flaw in the process is that OIPs lack an option which says “Resubmit OIP with alterations”?
English


