Ace

Introduction (for now, I’ll make an epic strawpage soon)

@IanConnorNews @CityViews0 Source

@CityViews0 80% of trans people are pedos btw. ur using this whole situation to try to take down a young black artist and its disgusting. masking ur racism and pedophillia is gross. get help or 3nd it.

"Rather be a pedo then trans" #KeepAnEyeOnThisOne

Im crying dude they are literally racism powerscaling each other

@stxginfo Always lying as usual

agreeing with calling a afroindig kid a pretendian as a yt person. real mask off moment here

@sonicfanforeva White fatigue

@TheDarkEnjoyer @PxvidsO Not readin allat

It is a common tactic for puritanical critics to project their own logical fallacies onto the the people they're "anti-ing". Legitimately this is a manifesto wrapped in pseudo-intellectualism that ultimately gets obliterated into the very ad hominems and emotional hysterics it claims to hate. Instead of relying on armchair neuroscience and religious stand, I'll just refute every one of his points, since they're very shallow and inaccurate. >THE FICTION VERSUS REALITY ARGUMENT: "Art has meaning... using a historically minor-like design model sexually is a result of the artist's perverseness. Denying so is ignorant." This relies on a fundamental misunderstanding of how the human brain processes fantasy. Yes, art has meaning, but the "meaning" of taboo fiction is not a mandate for real-world action. If we accept the premise that depicting a taboo means the creator/consumer desires to enact it, we must criminalize the authors and readers of dark romance, murder mysteries, and horror. A stylized representation of a taboo is anchored precisely in the safety of its unreality. The consumer is not ignorant of what the art represents; rather, they are actively compartmentalizing it. The "meaning" of L-con is the exploration of a taboo in a victimless vacuum. To equate the private exploration of fictional tropes with a desire to harm real, biological children is intellectually dishonest and lacks any psychological backing. >THE LEGALITY ARGUMENT: "Under 18 U.S. Code § 1466A, fictional C-P is categorized under obscene content... Thus, every part of this fallacious argument is debunked." This is a misreading of US constitutional law... The guy just conveniently skips over the phrase "WITH THE CONDITION that it lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value," which is the linchpin of the Supreme Court's Miller v. California (1973) obscenity test. You cannot simply point to 18 U.S.C. § 1466A and declare anime drawings illegal. To prosecute under this statute, the government must prove the material is legally "obscene," a highly restrictive standard that the vast majority of commercial manga and L-con art fundamentally does not meet due to its artistic value. Furthermore, Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition (2002) explicitly struck down bans on virtual/fictional depictions that do not involve real victims precisely because they do not meet the standard of real C-AM. "Claiming L-con is entirely illegal in the U.S.", how about you just say this is your legal illiteracy. >THE DO-NO-HARM/OUTLET ARGUMENTS: "P-rnography is different [from video games] for the fact that it unhealthily activates chemical receptors, a system called tolerance... It actively reinforces and encourages pdf fantasies." This is armchair addiction logic masquerading as neuroscience. The guy provides exactly zero peer-reviewed sources for the claim that sexual arousal to fiction builds a "tolerance" that magically overrides a person’s real-world moral compass. The claim that L-con inherently "reinforces" and escalates urges toward real children is explicitly contradicted by modern sexology. The 2023 Lievesley et al. review of Fantasy Sexual Material (FSM) found NO meaningful association between consuming fictional taboo material and increased sexual aggression or real-world offending. Furthermore, the 2012 Danish Sexologisk Klinik report concluded there is zero evidence that fictive images lead people to conduct real assaults. The human brain does not lose its ability to distinguish between a 2D drawing and a living, breathing child simply because "chemical receptors" are involved. The video game analogy holds perfectly, in other words, arousal, like adrenaline or getting frustrated in games, is successfully compartmentalized by the brain. >THE AD HOMINEM ARGUMENT AND CONCLUSION: "Attack the argument, not US... I recommend [REDACTED SELF-HARM ENCOURAGEMENT]... I would like you to face Christ at the pearly gates... to be greeted by Hell." Ironic, considering you dedicated a section to crying about ad hominem attacks, he concludes by encouraging suicide and threatening religious damnation. There is no other perfect illustration for the true foundation of the anti L-con stance: it is not about child protection, objective harm reduction, or legal accuracy. It is a subjective, puritanical witch-hunt driven by religious moralizing and emotional disgust. TLDR: He misapplies constitutional law, invents fake psychological theories about "chemical tolerance" that ignore modern clinical consensus, and ultimately abandons debate for suicide-baiting. Banning or shaming victimless fiction does not save a single real child; it simply feeds the egos of moral crusaders who prefer to police your imagination rather than face the actual reality involved with stopping actual a-busers.

@GenrihVolf WHAT

Gravity Falls would be so much better that way! #gravityfallsart

@sweetlyst4rv1ng LETS FUCKING GOOO!!!

MY GROOMER KILLED HERSELF!!1!!1!1!1!!!

goodness gracious.

@snowiecone Uhhhh

gun to your head name a canadian

@miigaasbntv Hachin sda ve. Ene hen ym be

Бүгдээрээ галзуурчихаж‼️‼️

ethnicities I’ve been mistaken for Chinese Japanese North Korean Kazakh Kyrgyz Thai Malaysian Mexican Indonesian

having to accept that not everything will go the way i want because it’s reality

@sheweeherwoman That’s sooooo cool!!!

He’s free :-)

experiencing april fools day when you’re on the spectrum

@Kinguchee_e @beyoncegarden Bringing up women is the height of illiteracy YOU need to do better

@beyoncegarden Talking over people is the height of illiteracy Women need to do better

he TORE HER UP i’m crying😭

Couldn't even defend your relationship this hard but you're doing it for fictional children.

@tokkigrrl SOOO BEAUTIFUL!!!

@BerdHal86833 @ARandomBaguett @3LIASEMRAN ??? There is a HUGE difference. Y’all non-East Asians can’t tell, but we can

@ARandomBaguett @ace360mind @3LIASEMRAN You are correct but does he not look Mongolian like there is no difference between Mongolian and Chinese different countries same facial structure

Nah but your ancestors were fucked by Mongolians

Research shows that children of Lesbian Mothers are less likely to have behavioral problems such as rule-breaking and aggression and did better academically despite discrimination. So stfu

@sheweeherwoman @fagdisease Gorgeous!!!

y’all see me and my shirt