Adarsh
42.1K posts

Adarsh
@adarshisit
Endless soliloquy (allegedly). Baroque lunacy tempered by tragic realism; possibly...


@adarshisit @MichaelKro82348 Specifically how did she "break that for her ego"? Like what did she do? Describe it in words



"hey men" and they are pigs 😭😭😭😭


@adarshisit Why fire back? She’s a patron at a show. It’s his job to make people laugh. He got in his feelings because she didn’t think he was funny.

Pretty unambiguously an expression of disgust. Since it appears adjacent to the joke he may have made, it distances her, signalling moral aversion. This distinction is a form of moral demarcation of where one is, relative to another. She’s on the appropriate side, and vice versa.

Pretty unambiguously an expression of disgust. Since it appears adjacent to the joke he may have made, it distances her, signalling moral aversion. This distinction is a form of moral demarcation of where one is, relative to another. She’s on the appropriate side, and vice versa.


men never block women if you're blocked you ruined his life


🚨 THE BCCI TO TAKE STRICT ACTIONS AGAINST GIRLFRIEND CULTURE GOING IN THE IPL. 🚨 1️⃣ BCCI preparing to enforce strict rule on Girlfriend culture. 👫 2️⃣ BCCI wants to be careful before any major blunder happens. ‼️ 3️⃣ Some of the players are even staying at the team’s hotel with their Girlfriends. 🏨 4️⃣ A BCCI official confirms the BCCI will be discussing about this. ✒️ 5️⃣ The BCCI is clear that family members and wives are not problem, but Girlfriends are. 🧑🧑🧒🧒 6️⃣ The new rules could be implemented from IPL 2027. 🗓️ 7️⃣ BCCI believe that if no strict regulations are taken then any major controversies could arise in future. (Abhishek Tripathi).




since yall are so employed can any of yall get me these books pls 🥺🥺🥺


@sauroness It depends though. If they consent to it, and demand exists, I don't see any categorical issues. Unless there is coercion involved, I'm unsure if it's really any worse than your corporate job. Perhaps it is tragic, but, it is the free market working is what I would think.


It kind of breaks the contract of a comedic event. You can roast the other guy, but if you specifically act disgusted by something because it is inappropriate, in a platform where everyone goes to bask in the transgressive inappropriateness, definitionally, then it's not on.








