Adhesivegrenade

Pro-aborts simply disagree with the notion that all humans are people. They do not believe in human rights because they don't feel all humans are human beings. Of course, they think they believe in human rights because they deny the humanity of those they deny rights

3) Cap class sizes at 25 students 4) Expel, not suspend, violent students. 5) Outlaw minimum grading policies and allowing parents to change their student's grades. Teachers and administrators can't do any of these things, it's all up to lawmakers and officials like Zohran.

Fixing public school is actually really easy, but nobody has the guts to do it. 1) Pass a law saying that anyone who sues a school and loses has to pay the school's legal bills, no exceptions. This is critical. 2) Hold back every child who can't perform at or near grade level.

They want bad outcomes. They know throwing money at the problem won't fix it - they're just already happy with the current outcomes and want more of it. It does make me said that the union/dem alliance cares more about themselves than the students.

@SobonBet @KristenWaggoner I did. If CO law says that trans-girls are girls then the school told the truth (from the law's POV) when they said that boys and girls would be on different floors. Is there something else I'm missing?

@adhesivegrenade @KristenWaggoner You didn't read the post, did you?

You missed the fact that school officials deceived this young girl and her parents, promising them that boys and girls would sleep on separate floors. It wasn’t until this 11-year-old girl was on the trip—far from home—that she discovered her expected bedmate was a boy. She was then forced to stand up against school authorities and defend her own privacy in the moment, late at night. They initially treated her as if her concerns were not legitimate, moving her to a different bed in the room. This backfired when the other roommates wanted the boy to move beds too. So this little girl had to muster the courage to voice her concerns a second time. The school finally relented and moved her to another room, but told her to lie about the reason why. Any reasonable person can see how outrageous this is. No child should have to defend her own privacy against a school policy that puts her in jeopardy. And no school district should make it a policy to deceive parents. Furthermore: not all kids have the ability or opportunity to stand up for themselves. Another family in our lawsuit has a son whose sleeping arrangements and showers were supervised by a female (identifying as non-binary) at a week-long school camp. Several of the boys were so uncomfortable that they skipped showers and changed their clothes inside their sleeping bags. This is inexcusable. It is adults’ responsibility to stand up for children—not children’s responsibility to stand up for themselves. This could easily be avoided with a commonsense policy that allows parents to stay informed and opt their children out of mixed-sex sleeping arrangements ahead of time—protecting the privacy of ALL children involved. But despite our requests, the school district repeatedly refused to do this. So yes, we sued. In fact, let me put every district in America on notice right now: if you treat students and parents this way, prepare for a lawsuit.

what do you mean it’s been half a decade.. the concept of time is scary as hell

@anne_joseypye @KristenWaggoner

@anne_joseypye @KristenWaggoner It's Colorado. Do you really expect me to believe that Colorado state law doesn't validate trans people? CO law explicitly prohibits schools from "discriminating" against trans people. share.google/S9Wh86D5gxgp8i…

@HoeMcAdams @Crawbaddy @MariGO2thepolls So what? It's an apt comparison because he was the last person dems elected president. Also, if Biden didn't run against Trump in 2024 then why did they debate? Maybe it's because Biden was so retarded that he had to drop out in the middle of the race... youtube.com/live/qqG96G8Yd…

@adhesivegrenade @Crawbaddy @MariGO2thepolls Also he was not running against Biden in 2024

Conservatives: you don’t get it. Its impossible to even consider I could be different I am metaphysically bound to every one of my characteristics Also conservatives: it’s illegitimate to judge me for what I say, do, or believe. You have to treat me as an abstract formless soul that is intrinsically good and if you don’t I’ll their another one of my tantrums

@HoeMcAdams @Crawbaddy @MariGO2thepolls So true, King. I guess if I can find one clip of Joe Biden saying something nonsensical then that's proof that no liberal or Democrat has a 110+ IQ, right?

@adhesivegrenade @Crawbaddy @MariGO2thepolls No one with an IQ of 110 believes this sort of shit or thinks that a person who is as retarded as this should be president x.com/atrupar/status…

Total education spending in the US exceeds defense spending—people dramatically overestimate how much is spent on defense.

@HoeMcAdams @Crawbaddy @MariGO2thepolls "Because only one of those exist" You're proving OP's point. Their point isn't that all Conservatives are 110+ IQ or that liberals should assume someone is 110+ upon finding out they're conservative. Their point is that some conservatives are 110 IQ and libs can't fathom that.

@Crawbaddy @adhesivegrenade @MariGO2thepolls It's quite literally his point that libs don't think of 110 IQ conservatives while they can think of Sudanese people, and it's because only one of those exist

For libs, empathy just means feeling sorry for and wanting to help someone who’s less fortunate or lower status That’s literally the definition they have in their minds. That’s why they assume that it’s synonymous or coterminous with being a leftist. If you have empathy, then you support leftism It’s hard for them to conceptualize cognitive empathy, wherein you can understand someone else’s perspective without becoming sentimental and sympathetic For libs, empathy is solely about caring, it’s not about understanding I can empathize with a homeless guy. I can realize that it must suck to be in his position and I wouldn’t want to be there. There’s a further aspect to empathy apart from feeling bad for him, which is to understand what must be going through his head Then you realize that he either makes terrible choices that has alienated him from all social support, or he has some sort of mental problem like schizophrenia or drug addiction that prevents him from taking salutary actions in his life Libs rarely seem to get to this point. For them, empathy stops at, “I feel sorry for this person.” Which is why, politically, they also stop at “just give this person money and housing.” They think that by caring, and feeling bad, and being nice to someone, the problem will be solved, and it’s only the lack of empathy in society that prevents the problem from being solved They haven’t actually empathized with a drug addict or a schizo though. It’s not the lack of a bed that keeps someone on the street. The drug addict simply wants to keep doing drugs, regardless of whether they have a bed. They want to spend money they’re given on drugs. The addiction overrides other behaviors Rehab, breaking the addiction, is the only thing that helps them But that requires being slightly mean and forcing them into treatment for a year. And using compulsory force isn’t “empathetic” in the lib framework where sympathy and care is necessary and sufficient That’s why Nikolaj has such a non sequitur response here to Wanye’s complaint about libs lacking empathy for conservatives. To Nikolaj, someone only needs empathy when they’re deserving of sympathy. White men are doing fine, therefore they don’t require any empathy from others.

@HoeMcAdams @Crawbaddy @MariGO2thepolls Projecting? You're literally lying about what a tweet says while linking the tweet for everyone to see. And no, that isn't what conservatives want or expect. We want and expect the other side to be competent enough to think of a legitimate state of mind for the other side.

@adhesivegrenade @Crawbaddy @MariGO2thepolls You're projecting, you're looking for libs to make the case that you're all actually clever boys and not retarded for supporting the dude who thinks prices can fall by 500%

"disparate impact" is one of the most damaging legal and philosophical doctrines in america. in essence, it says "you may not notice reality if reality is not to our liking." it's one of the foundational ideas of DEI, affirmative action, disparate charging and sentencing, and other such discrimination masquerading as justice. gone is the idea of equal treatment, equal before the law, and equal rights. in its place stands "no one may have rights and no one may be safe" because "if one group disproportionately commits crimes, then we must stop noticing and prosecuting the crimes." it's all of a piece. this is how you get decriminalized shoplifting, failure to prosecute, failure to hold felons despite dozens of violent arrests. these people hate the idea of "broken windows policing" not because it's oppressive but because it works. it rounds up illegals. it catches people out on warrants. it leads to a zillion other crimes being uncovered because the kinds of people who commit those crimes commit lots and lots of crimes. they are the sort of people who either do not care or cannot help it. you want to find these people and if the cost is "a few folks get fix it tickets for driving with unsafe windshields or expired tags" then fine. nearly all crime is committed by habitual offenders. identifying and engaging with repeat and recidivist criminals and, if need be, getting them off the streets is the only thing that works. they do not stop unless stopped. they just keep stealing, shooting, and pushing strangers to their deaths down flights of stairs.

@HoeMcAdams @Crawbaddy @MariGO2thepolls The tweet you're quoting doesn't say what you say it does... It's clearly saying that left-wing "empathy" is fake and playing pretend just to support their pre-conceived policy positions. The evidence is that lefties have no state of mind for others.

@Crawbaddy @MariGO2thepolls x.com/i/status/20541… The discourse started over cons crying over libs not thinking they're smart and would make good neighbours

What is shameful is that the minority leader of the House of Representatives of the United States of America, a country that fought a war costing 600,000 lives to end slavery based on its founding principle that every individual has a right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, would use race to draw political lines that favor his party and then call it justice. The Supreme Court ruled that sorting citizens into congressional districts by the color of their skin is unconstitutional. That is not the ghost of the Confederacy. That is the fulfillment of the principle the Confederacy died fighting against: that a man is an individual, not a representative of his race. Jeffries does not want colorblind districts because colorblind districts do not guarantee his outcomes. He needs racial categories because racial categories produce racial grievances and racial grievances produce voter turnout. The Confederacy grouped people by race and assigned them political status accordingly. Jeffries is demanding the exact same thing with different beneficiaries. He is not fighting the ghost of the Confederacy. He is trying to bring it back to life.

Brett Kavanaugh, a man in his 50s, had been valedictorian of his high school, at Yale College and a star student at Yale Law, had clerked for the Supreme Court, had a top career as an appellate lawyer and federal judge and a pristine reputation, and then a random woman from the town he grew up in claimed he had groped her at a party 35 years earlier when they were in high school. Kavanaugh didn’t try to argue that the incident was consensual. He didn’t claim he remembered things differently than she did. He immediately stated that he had never even met the accuser. Denying ever meeting the accuser is a much stronger claim than merely denying assaulting her, and much easier to refute. After Kavanaugh made this denial, Christine Blasey-Ford no longer had to prove he had sexually assaulted her to scuttle his nomination, she only had to prove that the two of them had attended a party together at which such an assault might have occurred. She was unable to do so. She did not know whose house the alleged assault occurred at. None of the people she claimed attended the party corroborated any aspect of her account. Leland Keyser, a friend of Blasey-Ford’s, who the accuser claimed was at the alleged party, said she recalled no such event and had never met Kavanaugh. Kavanaugh produced a detailed calendar he had kept during the summer Blasey-Ford alleged she was assaulted, which included his whereabouts of every weekend night and listing who he was with. Kavanaugh argued that he could alibi himself and provide witnesses for any night Blasey-Ford claimed she might have been at a party with him. Blasey-Ford responded that she did not know the date of her assault and was not entirely certain it even occurred that year. Instead of being seen as persuasive, Kavanaugh’s calendar was mocked in both mainstream and social media because the reason he kept it was for a drinking contest he was having with his friends. Nearly a decade later, there is still not a single shred of proof or a single witness who will corroborate the claim that Brett Kavanaugh and Christine Blasey-Ford were ever in the same room before she testified at his confirmation hearing. Nonetheless, people like Nick Kristof still claim Kavanaugh was “credibly accused” of sexually assaulting this woman.

@girllafraidd Accept your fate as a history teacher, it's pretty fun

I also don’t want to be a history teacher or go to law school so hmmm why did I pick this major.,,, what was past me planning 🩷

Translation: Grooming Target