@Alexarmstrong Relax, the queen was comfortable around them. Don't get scared no one does knife fighting in these countries and no one wears it to intimidate others. They just feel more handsome in this dress.
English
Ayman Adris
45 posts
I will say nothing about the contents of this video filmed on Wednesday - but you tell me if you feel comfortable around men brandishing these knives openly like this in Britain?
The special exemption must be repealed, whether Sikhs like it or not.
English
Stoning women is traditional too, but we don't want that in Britain either
Aɴᴛ@AntSpeaks
Two Muslim men arrested in Manchester for carrying, well, not knives, but swords. Listen carefully and at one point some pathetic sap in the background tries to excuse it by claiming it’s “traditional.”
English
@vult_dues Was it God's message, or in fact, reality of Roman law ? Bible doesn't say polygamy is not allowed, it assumes monogamy instead. The rare exception of Romans in the old world, is the sole reason, why christian nations, and why even liberals today, are monogamous!
English
@MariluD85058674 @RealJamesWoods If you don't see them, doing all these things you hate, you won't hate them this much, if you don't hate them much, you won't support bombing their countries...which will cause problems to people controlling you ....so everytime and then ...you need more of them. 🤷♂️
English
@RealJamesWoods Tell Muslims to built their Mosques at the Country of birth. Please..........send them back! Eventually we will have to fight them on the street of America! It's only a question of time.
English
Mosques are popping up like a fungus in every city in the U.S. Yet so many Americans are asking why are they stopping traffic to “pray” in the streets. It’s not about prayer, folks. It’s a declaration of war. The invaders are declaring their ownership.
English
@ImtiazMadmood Another delusional "muslim atheist", originating from a muslim country, thinking he is not in the same boat with "his people".
English
In 732 AD, MusIim armies entered France after they had already conquered Spain completely.
French forces attempted to stop the invasion. At the front stood Charles Martel of France. He blocked them near the town of Tours. The battle was brutal—sword against sword.
The MusIim commander was kiIIed in the fight. The invaders retreated and fled France. That battle stopped Islam from spreading further into Europe.
But today, the foolish politicians are allowing what some men prevented with their bl00d.
Wake Up People, Islam Is Not Compatible With The World.
English
Greater Manchester Police have just arrested two knife wielding foreign men MINUTES away from Manchester city centre.
The men are claiming the knives are for "religious purposes" - just like the knife that Henry Nowaks killer used.
It's time to BAN the Kirpin!
English
@ThatRecidivist @Kafirewwnasty @Aamilky97Wwww @mohammed_hijab @TRobinsonNewEra Well, U.S crimes is not a historical sins. You may disagree with MAGA, and trump, that the U.S is a christian nation, but they are ones ruling. 💁♂️
English
@Kafirewwnasty @Aamilky97Wwww @mohammed_hijab @TRobinsonNewEra I'd care more about Christianity's historical sins if they were still murdering, raping, kidnapping and randomly exploding. Christianity grew out of violent expansionism. Islam never has and never will.
Islam is a blight upon humanity.
English
Would he have done this to a Muslim woman wearing a hijab ?
Ramy Abdu| رامي عبده@RamAbdu
🇳🇱 Outrage in the Netherlands after footage appeared to show a police officer forcefully throwing a pregnant woman to the ground during an arrest, raising questions about the use of force.
English
@MarioNawfal Mario, successfully generating engagement for money, by angering different groups, with whatever he finds. I now did unfollow him.
English
🇬🇧 They dressed as religious men to avoid drawing suspicion.
When they were caught with knives, they claimed they carrying them for traditional purposes, whatever that means.
English
@MarcusSpinoza @Samekaab30832 @JoramvKlaveren In addition, why slaughtering without stunning is not banned overall western countries ? What problems you have with muslims there is mostly an identity politics rather than genuine religion issues.
English
@adris680 @Samekaab30832 @JoramvKlaveren No they werent. They are still applied and their are still humans refusing to stun the animals before killing them just because they believe a god ordered them to do it. Just as mutilating the penis and/or vagina of their kids...
English
Every year over 1 billion animals are killed by McDonalds, KFC, Burger King and many others. Just for profit and feeding the people who can afford it. During Eid Al-Adha Muslims sacrifice them to feed the poor, for free and in name of the Creator. But critics lose their mind…
English
@MarcusSpinoza @Samekaab30832 @JoramvKlaveren 2- Many muslims today, think that stunning animals is against Islam directives, this is plainly wrong. or that their traditional directives are merciful enough, in which case you can convince them otherwise. You didn't leave your curlety overnight.
English
@MarcusSpinoza @Samekaab30832 @JoramvKlaveren There are two sides of this :
1 - Muslim sources do acknowledge that animals are sentient beings, they suffer and muslims are directed to reduce that suffering. This is true and easily provable. ....
English
@MarcusSpinoza @Samekaab30832 @JoramvKlaveren What you saying effectively means eating animals should have not been allowed. There was no, non-cruel stuning method, prior to 19th century, not in muslim world, nor anywhere else. This is an undersable position from a vegetarian, not from meat lover ! 🤷♂️
English
@adris680 @Samekaab30832 @JoramvKlaveren Because allah was invented by 7th cebtury arabs that were ignorant of annimal suffering (& other things) and thought it was not bad to make an animal suffer. Thanks to science we know animals suffer & have feelings, so humans made laws to limit their suffering as much as possible
English
@mohammed_hijab Hardly a new phenomenon in muslim world. Interestingly, women scholars were more present in conservative muslim circles than those more "rational" currents. This huge 43 volumes book documents female Hadith narrators, from early centuries of Islam. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Wafa_b…
English
We should acknowledge the psychological reality: many men opposing conservative Muslim female figures aren’t driven purely by jurisprudential conviction, but by discomfort that many women perform the role more effectively than us. If we were medieval warriors, we wouldn’t care but many derive their self-concept from public engagement. We don’t see Christians behaving this way with Candace Owens, and this insecurity is part of our failure
English
@MarcusSpinoza @Samekaab30832 @JoramvKlaveren The problem with the west is simple: They were the absolute winners of barbarism, for the longest period in history. The wake up to this shocking reality, how to deal with it ? project your past self on some "others". Today muslims are the perfect others !
English
@Samekaab30832 @adris680 @JoramvKlaveren The less bad way is to stun them before killing them. Its barbaric to hold it down (which rases stress and suffering), slit the throat and it consciously suffocates in its blood. Typical barbaric 7th century humans. But hey, they and allah are ok with slavery, public torture etc
English
@MarcusSpinoza @Samekaab30832 @JoramvKlaveren Who said not allowed? The argument it is a must, is more credible than arguing that it is not allowed.
aliftaa.jo/research-fatwa…
English
@adris680 @Samekaab30832 @JoramvKlaveren If thats true, why is it not allowed to stun the animal before killing it? 🤔
English
@MarcusSpinoza @Samekaab30832 @JoramvKlaveren There is no any Islamic teachings amount to animal "have to suffer consciously". It should not be already dead when slaughtered, that is all.
English
@Samekaab30832 @JoramvKlaveren I only boycott those that serve halal food because they participate in the barbaric ritual sacrifice of animals that have to suffer consciously and discriminatory labour practices (non muslims cant touch the meat of muslims during slaughter process). Disgusting 7th century cult
English
@JamesKowalski88 So you don't believe any news outlet today? because that is literally what they do.
English
An Isnad is literally just saying: 'My friend's teacher's cousin's uncle said he heard the Prophet say this 200 years ago.' In any historical study or modern courtroom, that is called hearsay. It is not evidence. 🤡
The Orthodox Muslim@muslimorthodoxy
This is just not analogous, The Quran’s text was fixed by the lifetime of the Sahaba and because we can verify this and that they actually interacted with the text, their understanding is vital. On the other hand, this apostolic succession of your churches is a fairytale. We don’t have the words of the apostles nor their writings and they definitely did not believe in a hypostatic union
English
@JamesKowalski88 You are conflating the types of evidence. There is nothing to wonder about when people starts to believe someone is a God, and attribute all sorts of miraculous actions and sayings to him, just 20 years after his death, or even, in his lifetime!
English
You reject the 1st-century historical manuscripts written by Jesus’s actual disciples and contemporaries who witnessed Him claim divinity. Instead, you blindly trust a guy sitting in a cave 600 years later, 800 miles away, with zero historical proof. Make it make sense. 🤡
Mr. Romantic@Boss_Aleeyu
Jesus was a messenger of Allah. He called people to worship one God and follow the path of submission to God. Muslims believe that Jesus was a prophet and never claimed to be God. Read more about the life and teachings of Jesus. You will understand jesus was a muslim.
English