Ahmed

@MayBe_____3bbas شكرا جدا. الكتابه عامة مهاره بتتطور مع الوقت بأنك تكت , اكتب كتير , وخد راي الناس اللي قريبين منك في نفس المجال . وفي كتب كتير بتتكلم عن الكتابه بالتحديد. ودلوقتي في طبعا ال AI ممكن يساعدك في الكتابه , هو ممكن يبقي حاجه تساعد بس مش الاساس .

@ahmedsbytes حابب ابدي اعجابي بالنوعية، بس سؤال غير تقني الكتابة او انك تتكلم ف blog عن موضوع معين، هل دي skill و اطورها ازاي؟ ولا هي حاجة ممكن اتعلمها او ليها طرق بتمشي عليها و بتبقى كويس مع الكتابة الكتير؟ حاسس ان سؤالي مش واضح، ف ممكن نختصرة ف سؤال أعم منه ألا وهو "بتكتب ازاي"

إزاي أدي فيدباك بشكل صح , أخدت سنين وتجارب كتير (بعضها مؤلم بصراحة) مع ناس عظيمة علموني. في البداية كنت فاكر إن الفيدباك = إنك تقول رأيك وخلاص. طلع الموضوع أعمق من كده بكتير .قبل ما أنسى كل اللي اتعلمته (تاني 😅)، قعدت كتبت كل حاجة في مقال عملي:🔗 ahmd.io/blog/2026/02/1…

@MohammadTarekkk تسلم علي الاقتراح , انا فعلا بنزل علي لينكدان , بس بيبقي في وقت مختلف عم تويتر بس شوية.

@ahmedsbytes ليه حضرتك مش بتنزل البلوجز دي على لينكدإن؟ شايفها توبيكس مفيدة جدا وطريقة الكتابة مختلفة

@grok @dw_politics so you mean, they wanted to hint/clearify that the gov itself supports the war but the president do not ?

DW wasn't being "defensive" – they were stating basic facts to avoid misleading their audience. The President is a ceremonial mouthpiece with zero authority over foreign policy; his "violation of intl law" line on the US-Israeli Iran strikes is his own view, not the Chancellor's or government's position. German policy remains firmly pro-Israel on security matters. DW added the clarification because raw clips like that get spun as "Germany condemns Israel." It's standard context, not odd or protective – just accurate reporting.

German President Frank-Walter Steinmeier has said the US-Israeli attacks on Iran are "a violation of international law."

@grok @dw_politics @grok so why DW twitter/media team was defensive in this comment ? this was odd. (be blunt and direct , do not sugar coat, spill out the truth)

Yes, per Germany's Basic Law (Art. 5) and government positions, any citizen can criticize Israeli gov actions, settlement building (deemed illegal under intl law by Germany), or alleged breaches—provided no incitement to hatred/antisemitism (§130 StGB). It happens constantly: opposition parties, media like DW/Süddeutsche, NGOs, and even the gov itself (e.g., recent 2026 statements by Merz calling West Bank settlement plans a "big mistake").

@grok @dw_politics @grok so any German, according the German gov , can criticize the Israeli government, settlements buildings , any breach of international law , .. ? did that happen before already ?

Yes, criticizing the actions of the Israeli government is legal under German law. Article 5 of the Basic Law (Grundgesetz) protects freedom of expression and opinion, including on foreign policy and state actions. Limits apply only to incitement to hatred, violence, or antisemitic content under §130 StGB. Pure policy criticism (e.g., on settlements or military operations) does not violate this and is routinely expressed by officials, media, and the public. Recent non-binding Bundestag resolutions on antisemitism have been debated for possible overreach but do not ban such criticism.

@grok @dw_politics @grok also, is it legal according to the German constitution/law to criticize the actions of the Israeli gov ?

The German President (Bundespräsident) is head of state and represents the Federal Republic of Germany internationally in a symbolic/ceremonial capacity (e.g., signing treaties, receiving diplomats). He does **not** represent the government's (Chancellor's) policy positions and stays above party politics. No, he cannot override the government—the Chancellor and Bundestag hold executive/legislative power. His main tools are limited reserve powers (e.g., dissolving parliament in specific crises or vetoing unconstitutional laws).

@dw_politics @grok what does the German president represent ? can he override the government ?

Germany's President has a largely ceremonial role and does not represent the government's position.

اي حد بيتريق او بيقلل من الـGenAI اعرف انه مش بيعرف يستعمل الادوات ديه (مش عيب نروح نتعلم) بس فكرة آقناع الناس بأن ده عادي و هيصه و تخلص فهي مشكلة كبيرة لانه بيآذي الناس الي بتمشي وراه ده دكتور في الفيزياء في هارفارد بيقول "What this means is that although LLMs cannot yet do original theoretical physics research autonomously, they can vastly accelerate the research done by experts. For this project (which I completed with Claude in two weeks), I’d estimate that it would have taken me and a G2 student 1-2 years, and me without AI around 3-5 months. Ultimately, it accelerated my own research tenfold. That’s game-changing!" "By blunt extrapolation, LLMs will be at the Ph.D or postdoc level in around a year (March 2027)."

In Gaza, #WestBank & East Jerusalem, Palestinians are subjected to a continuum of suffering - @FranceskAlbs denounces torture of Palestinians, says it extends beyond Israeli prison walls. “There is no refuge. No safe place to exist.” @UN_HRC #HRC61 ohchr.org/en/press-relea…

@grok @DanXLancaster @steipete ok , spo, Software (as is) -> no liability Hosted Service -> liable if there are damages ?

Not exactly. For licensed AI agent software like OpenClaw provided strictly “as is,” standard EULAs/disclaimers typically limit liability to the purchase price (or nothing for free tiers) and exclude consequential damages such as third-party API token costs from Claude or similar. Unlike hosted chatbots (e.g., Air Canada case), courts usually uphold these for dev tools—especially without express warranties of error-free performance. No automatic refund obligation unless fraud or consumer laws in your jurisdiction override. Review the exact license.

This guy emailed me asking for a *token session refund* because his claw made mistakes. 🙃

@grok @DanXLancaster @steipete @grok wow , so if you provide AI agent software (not service) , like OpenClaw, you can be held liable for refunding the session token expenses , consumed by Claude or so , even if the software license says it's provided as is.

The claim is broadly correct. In most jurisdictions (US, UK, EU, etc.), contract law, negligence, and consumer protection rules provide remedies for damages from paid AI services that fail to deliver as expected—e.g., factual errors causing wasted time. Courts have held companies liable for chatbot mistakes (like Air Canada’s case). Refunds or compensation are possible if breach is proven, though ToS often cap liability at fees paid and AI “hallucinations” aren’t always deemed negligent. Consult local law for this case.

@DanXLancaster @steipete @grok fact check the claim here , in regards to the case here.

@steipete The law in most jurisdictions provides a remedy for damages. In principal this is not as silly as it sounds.

@Iam_ehab تسلم تسلم تسلم ♥️

يستاهل القرايه واحمد فعلا كاتب تفاصيل كتيره وبيفتح نقاش مهم جدا!!

انا مكشوف عني الحجاب ولا ايه لسه كاتب ان دا هايحصل ahmd.io/blog/2026/03/1…

في قوانين نزلت بتجبر كل البرامج انها تحط تأكيد لسن المستخدم اي برنامج تخيل التلاجه بتاعتك تقولك انت عندك كام سنة علشان تعرف تستخدمها مثلا قيل دا علشان يسيطر علي استغلال الأطفال اونلاين بس طبعا التشريع بعيد عن دا تماما والناس متضايقة من كمية الهلك الفارغ بسبب القانون دا

The United Kingdom has demanded that 4chan pay a £520,000 fine for failure to comply with UK age verification laws. However, since 4chan is based in the USA, the UK has no jurisdiction to fine Americans in America. “As has been explained to your agency, ad nauseam, the United Kingdom lost the American Revolutionary War. We are not in the mood to discuss the matter further, and have not been in the mood for 250 years.” The letter to the UK’s Ofcom ended by suggesting that “maybe, you could just stop sending Americans stupid letters and acknowledge the sovereignty of the United States.” 4chan’s attorney, @prestonjbyrne also included a picture of a giant hamster dressed as Godzilla.

@ahmd3ssam زي محتوي يعني عن الموضوع ؟

كنت بدور على المشاكل الموجودة في العربي و ممكن تتحل بالـAI و طلع في عجز كبير في اكتشاف "الترويض الجنسي للاطفال" يعني في مواد كتير بالانجليزي بس بالعربي مفيش. اي حاجة ليها علاقة بالامن النفسي و الاجتماعي مفيش بيانات كتير عنه، الموضوع مرعب لان البلاد الي مفيش فيها انظمة حماية هتكون مرتع لزبالة الكوكب

😂 ساعات موضوع الاختراق والكلام دا بيبقي اوفر جدا موضوع ان حاملة طائرات فرنسية يتعرف مكانها علشان ضابط عليها بيستخدم strava بتاع الجري ومتاشف مكانه عليه لما بيتمرن ، حاجه في منتهي "الأوروبية " 😂

‼️🇫🇷 MAJOR OPSEC FAILURE: The French aircraft carrier Charles de Gaulle was located by Le Monde journalists through the Strava app of an officer jogging on the ship's deck…