A J

8.9K posts

A J banner
A J

A J

@ajbear85

Katılım Nisan 2013
1.2K Takip Edilen457 Takipçiler
A J
A J@ajbear85·
@127J_H Chris Harris will be out of retirement
English
0
0
0
181
A J
A J@ajbear85·
@ryanmcnairn Good. Hope you feel that sacred one day in your place of work Sure your act the same
English
0
0
2
170
Rydo
Rydo@ryanmcnairn·
Hearts player next to Shankland (cant tell who it is) quite clearly trying to stamp on a celtic fans phone after knocking it out his hand 😂
English
435
324
2.9K
903.4K
A J
A J@ajbear85·
@weymarplanet Don’t need all rounder Our best team of my life of watching cricket … since about 1992. Didn’t have one and won away in aus and then in India Our obsession with balancing a team needs to stop after stokes
English
1
0
0
266
WeymarOnCricket
WeymarOnCricket@weymarplanet·
Based on the replies, Ben Stokes is basically locked into the XI because of his bowling, past glory, and the fact that there's no one to replace him yet. But looking ahead, who is likely to be England's long-term all-rounder and captain? I'm just curious to know some names.
WeymarOnCricket@weymarplanet

Strange how people aren't talking about Ben Stokes' pathetic performance, especially with the bat during the Ashes. Is he immune to criticism?

English
27
3
44
17.6K
A J
A J@ajbear85·
@Oxygen18_ Sombody needs to starve you of your name
English
0
0
0
34
Oxygen
Oxygen@Oxygen18_·
🚨🚨CRICKET RULES NEED TO BE CHANGED The lbw rule needs to be wiped from cricket. You're trying to hit the ball and you failed to connect the ball and it hit your pads and just because your legs are in front of the stumps, you're given out. What an awkward and non sense rule. This doesn't make any sense. I don't count this as a valid way of getting out.
English
107
0
79
203.8K
Elegantly Wasted
Elegantly Wasted@TheCharismaVoid·
@gcraven10 I’d (controversially?) put Men Behaving Badly in that bracket too.
English
14
0
12
7.8K
l
l@lostcause_z·
@GoatedAdel Genuinely curious what do you suggest someone born in north London who’s supported man utd since they were young and is now 24 years old do? should they they stick to United or support a London team now lol I’m genuinely interested isn’t it too late to change at that age
English
2
0
0
113
A J
A J@ajbear85·
@Darloww_TH @itfcrg Only issue if sponsorship…. Nobody would sponsor without the European qualifying big boys
English
0
0
0
168
Ally
Ally@Darloww_TH·
@itfcrg Wrong. It should be given to the winner of the Carabao Cup. Also, teams that qualify for Europe should be ineligible to play in the Carabao Cup. New winner every year for a domestic competition and a new team in Europe each year.
English
6
0
3
1.2K
rg (p) 🚜
rg (p) 🚜@itfcrg·
unpopular opinion: the english conference league spot should be given to the team that finishes 1st in the championship the season before
English
124
50
3.6K
697K
GeorgeWard
GeorgeWard@Georgeward_97·
@NatJPeters Conservative? You fuckin tit can’t be a bluenose if that’s the case
English
4
0
4
881
Nat
Nat@NatJPeters·
I'd like to thank everybody who voted for Big Nat on Thursday night. I can't wait to start my new job as Prime Minister on Monday morning. HARRY THEM BLUES
Nat tweet media
English
7
0
13
8.3K
A J
A J@ajbear85·
@Liam_J20 How about leave the house and don’t use your phone till you actually need to? Not constant scrolling bollocks. You’d be fine and still have battery when you got in from the night club
English
0
0
0
70
Liam
Liam@Liam_J20·
Clubs cant simultaneously enforce digital tickets, digital apps etc and not allow power banks. Fucking daft.
Manchester United Matchday@ManUtdMatchday

Supporter Information - Sunderland Away 🏟️ All supporters travelling to Sunderland are encouraged to view the visiting supporter information guide here: manutd.co/xhV050YR9Mk Manchester United supporters are urged to take note of a no-coin policy in the away end at the Stadium of Light. All coins confiscated by Sunderland stewards will be put in donation buckets with the collection going to Manchester United Foundation. There will also be a collection system in place for power banks and vapes where supporters can collect these items with a numbered ticket after full-time. We wish you safe travels up to Wearside – see you there! 🔴⚪️⚫️

English
18
9
524
149.3K
A J
A J@ajbear85·
@_WokeNonsenseFC Everybody forgets Freiburg has a football team
English
0
0
0
1.1K
🇬🇧🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🎯
I actually can’t believe one of Brentford, Bournemouth or Brighton are gonna be in the UCL Like imagine someone like Real Madrid rocking up to the Vitality Stadium that holds just 11k fans in a seaside town in Dorset 😭 Just doesn’t feel real
English
185
1.1K
22.2K
534.9K
A J
A J@ajbear85·
@jen_moxon Not a need you moron. Just a fun tipple
English
0
0
0
25
A J
A J@ajbear85·
@MattWalshBlog I jus think his life should be made a living hell
English
0
0
0
22
Matt Walsh
Matt Walsh@MattWalshBlog·
I am challenging any death penalty opponent — there are millions of them, allegedly — to step up to the plate right now and explain why this guy should not be executed. His guilt is established beyond any doubt whatsoever. His crime is utterly savage and heinous. Tell us why he doesn’t deserve to die. Go ahead.
Breaking911@Breaking911

BREAKING: Tanner Horner, the FedEx driver who kidnapped and murdered 7-year-old Athena Strand in Texas, has been sentenced to death.

English
8.3K
4.8K
54.6K
9.3M
(((Robin Levett)))
(((Robin Levett)))@LevettRoblev1·
@tonymc39 @ifellonithonest If they can't live on their wages, then they're not being paid the true cost of the labour; is that not obvious? No; I advocate policy that corrects the market - by shifting responsibility for paying living wages from the taxpayer to the employer.
English
1
0
0
18
Andy Bryson
Andy Bryson@ifellonithonest·
Am actually astounded that so many people have no idea about the costs involved running a small business and seem to think that adding further wage and NI costs to it will somehow make it more profitable.
English
46
40
742
21K
A J
A J@ajbear85·
@MikeJ_A Jumps of the wrong leg. Get that sorted she be great
English
0
0
1
275
A J
A J@ajbear85·
@CallumLyon They aren’t. That’s the point. Minimum wage was never meant to support sombody living on there own with all the things that people work hard for years to achieve it was meant to stop people being exploited and basically used as slave labour. Being paid min wage is good for some
English
0
0
0
695
Callum Lyon
Callum Lyon@CallumLyon·
How the fk are people working full time on minimum wage in the UK meant to actually survive alone? The maths just doesn't add up: Take home pay after tax, national insurance and pension contributions for a 37.5 hour work week (because let's face it, all these employers who really care about you don't pay you for your breaks so you're not getting a full 40 hours) is around £1700 You're lucky to rent anywhere nowadays under £800. Council Tax is now around £220 a month. Utilities are at least another £350. Then there's the weekly food shop, you're looking at a minimum of £70 a week. Just with the basics in this scenario you're left with £50 to last you the whole month. And that's without even adding transport or anything going wrong. Minimum.wage in the UK does not cover minimum living requirements. Something really needs to change. No wonder nobody wants to work anymore.
English
241
161
1.1K
120K
Damien Willey (Kernow Damo) 🟢 🔴
The most revealing thing in this post is that the worker’s need to live never appears as a real business cost. VAT is real. Business rates are real. Energy bills are real. National Insurance is real. Rent is real. Beans, milk, cups, insurance, accountants, card fees, compliance, all real. But the person making the coffee needing enough money to pay rent, eat, heat their home, travel to work and not rely on state top-ups? Suddenly that is “silly socialism”. No. That is the cost of labour. If your business model depends on paying people less than they need to live, then the state is not attacking your business by demanding higher wages. The state is currently propping your business up by letting taxpayers subsidise the gap between what you pay and what your staff need to survive. That is the bit you cannot grasp, or do not want to grasp. You say businesses fail because they are unprofitable. Fine. Businesses do fail. But “I can only make a profit if my workers stay poor” is not a serious moral defence of a business. It is a confession. You say a cup of coffee has to absorb lots of costs. Yes. Welcome to business. But you are treating wages as the flexible bit that must always be squeezed so your business model survives. Nobody says, “If you can’t afford coffee beans, just get the taxpayer to provide the beans.” Nobody says, “If you can’t afford electricity, tell the staff to sit in the dark and call it prosperity.” But when the unaffordable item is the person being doing the work, suddenly everyone is supposed to become very mature and economically literate about poverty pay. You also get VAT badly muddled. VAT-registered businesses can generally reclaim VAT on goods and services bought for business use, and the VAT registration threshold is turnover above £90,000. So this line about 20% VAT and inputs not being claimable is not the killer argument you think it is. The bigger point is simpler. Workers do not get to tell landlords, supermarkets, energy firms and train companies that their boss has “compounding costs” so everyone must please wait quietly while they are paid less than a living wage. The worker’s bills have compounded too. Their rent has gone up. Their food has gone up. Their energy has gone up. Their council tax has gone up. Their travel has gone up. Funny how “proper economics” always discovers pressure when it lands on the owner, but turns into a lecture on realism when it lands on the staff. The Green proposal is £15 an hour by April 2027. The real Living Wage is already £13.45 across the UK and £14.80 in London, calculated on what people need to live, not what a struggling employer would prefer to pay. And even before that, the Joseph Rowntree Foundation found that a single working-age adult on the National Living Wage was nearly £7,000 short of the gross income needed for a minimum acceptable standard of living in 2025. So spare us the sob story that £15 is some wild Bolshevik fantasy. It is much closer to the actual cost of surviving than poverty pay dressed up as realism. You say jobs will disappear. That is always the threat. Every time wages rise, the same people emerge to announce that civilisation will collapse because a cleaner, waiter, carer or barista might be able to pay a bill without choosing which meal to skip. Yet the Low Pay Commission’s latest judgement was that recent National Living Wage increases have not had a significant negative impact on employment. That does not mean every business has no pressure. Of course small businesses are under pressure. Business rates need reform. Energy costs are brutal. Rents are often obscene. Big chains can absorb shocks that small independents cannot. But none of that proves workers should be the shock absorber. It proves the economy has been built so badly that the smallest businesses and the lowest-paid workers are set against each other while landlords, energy firms, banks and large corporations walk away with the margin. Your welfare argument is even worse. Universal Credit is explicitly available to people who are working but on low incomes, and as earnings rise, Universal Credit is tapered down. That means low wages and public spending are already linked. The taxpayer is already helping cover the living costs that low-pay employers do not meet. So when you ask “where does the money come from?”, one answer is: from the business that uses the labour. That is not extremist. That is basic decency. Profit is not ugly. Profit made by selling a product people want, paying suppliers properly, paying workers enough to live, and still having something left over is perfectly defensible. Profit made by underpaying staff and then expecting the public to top them up through benefits is not heroic enterprise. It is a business model leaning on the state while pretending to despise the state. And this “read a book” routine is always funny from people whose entire economic theory seems to be: owners must be protected from hardship, workers must be exposed to it, and taxpayers must quietly make up the difference while being lectured about socialism. A liveable wage is not a luxury add-on. It is the price of employing a human being. If a business cannot pay rent, it cannot use the building. If it cannot pay suppliers, it cannot use the stock. If it cannot pay energy bills, it cannot keep the lights on. And if it cannot pay workers enough to live, it should not expect applause for creating jobs that keep people poor.
Peter McCormack 🏴‍☠️🇬🇧🇮🇪@PeterMcCormack

A simple message to the silly socialists. You’re upset by businesses telling you that they will fail with the minimum wage increase. You’re telling business owners silly things like if you can’t pay the minimum wage then you don’t have a viable business. I want to make this easier to understand, because if you mean what you say, you want people to have jobs and earn a liveable wage. So listen, businesses fail for all kinds of reasons, mainly because they are unprofitable. We are seeing a wave of business closures at the moment because of the compounding costs from the state against a cost of living crisis. To make a cup of coffee profitable it has to eat a lot costs: - 20% VAT (the inputs can’t be claimed back) - Business rates (a tax before you earn) - Rising NI costs - Employment rights load - Rising energy costs - Inflation All these are imposed by the state. There is also a time tax with all the accounting, HR and regularity requirements which impose cost of consultants and time costs to ensure compliance, distracting owners from operating their businesses. Then there are the other normal costs. A business owner needs to make a profit else the business fails. If the business fails there are less jobs and lower tax receipts. If there are less jobs then public services crumble and welfare requirements increase. This is a compounding problem and what leads to the downward spiral of a country. So… where does the money come from if there are less jobs. The government borrows it, that increase in the money supply drives more inflation, making life more expensive for the people you want to help. Some who now don’t have the job they once had. So what now? What is your plan? I get it, you don’t really have one, this is what has happened to every socialist state, this is how a country goes from rich to poor. We have no divine right to be a wealthy nation and can certainly lose that status. So this is your challenge, can you accept society has a distribution of wealth which means there are rich and poor or would you rather everyone was poorer as long as there are no rich. That’s what socialists tend to want, though I have a secret for you, you can’t get rid of people being rich. I know you think profit is ugly, but the profit motive is what creates business and jobs. So anyway. I’m going to keep promoting proper economics because that’s how a nation becomes prosperous and prosperity leads to a net better outcome for all. This does mean I am going to have to make fun of your stupid socialist ideas. Good luck, read a book and stop being a dumb dumb.

English
163
448
1.7K
75.8K
A J
A J@ajbear85·
@Cammy260 It’s very cringe and the lads will look back on it when a bit older a say “what we’re thinking “ and laugh. That’s it. It’s cringe. It’s not really hurting anybody other than there chances of getting the love back 😂
English
0
0
2
1.2K