
Alex
219 posts











There is a huge reluctance to have anything to do with AI in education. This is a mistake. Big changes are coming whether we like it or not and could dramatically improve the working lives of teachers and improve pupil outcomes.


Genuine question… if AI takes all the jobs and everything keeps getting more expensive, what’s the plan for regular people?









Sir Isaac Newton had an estimated IQ of 190 - 200 and died a virgin. The IQ number is of course just a guess, but we know he was profoundly gifted. We also know he never reproduced. An IQ of 200 is 6.67 standard deviations above average. If accurately measured, there may be zero people alive today with an IQ of 200. It is not surprising that nature does not select for intelligence past a certain level. It becomes counterproductive to reproduction. I also think it is counterproductive to life in general. The few legitimate high-level geniuses I have known in my life did not reproduce. They did not create anything on their own. They generally were: • chronically negative • paralyzed on big decisions • lacked social skills • looked to others for direction Like everything else in life, there is a sweet spot for intelligence. Too little or too much is not good.



China produces more aluminum than the rest of the world combined. Much of the production cost is not labor (<5%) but electricity (30-40%+). China has low electricity costs, massive scale, and digital integration. Awesome new report by @wang_seaver & co: thebreakthrough.org/issues/energy/…








