Alyson Shontell

4.9K posts

Alyson Shontell banner
Alyson Shontell

Alyson Shontell

@ajs

Editor-in-Chief and CCO, @Fortunemagazine. Former EIC @businessinsider. @NewhouseSU Advisory Board. Proudly married to @lombosco!

New York, NY Katılım Mart 2009
3.1K Takip Edilen33.5K Takipçiler
Alyson Shontell
“The old CEO model assumed communications flowed vertically: company to media, media to public, public to market. Today, it flows in every direction simultaneously.” Jack Schlossberg has a warning for America's CEOs: you're living in my world now | Fortune fortune.com/2026/03/18/jac…
English
0
2
3
2.8K
Alyson Shontell retweetledi
Will Oremus
Will Oremus@WillOremus·
A journalist filed a brief live blog entry on an apparent Iranian missile strike that hit no one and caused no serious damage. Next thing he knew, angry Polymarket users were demanding he change the story—and threatening his life and family if he refused. (story link in reply)
Will Oremus tweet media
English
4
35
89
8.4K
Alyson Shontell retweetledi
Jeremy Kahn
Jeremy Kahn@jeremyakahn·
‘The Karpathy Loop’: Former OpenAI researcher’s autonomous agents ran 700 experiments in 2 days—and gave a glimpse of where AI is heading fortune.com/2026/03/17/and…
English
0
4
1
2.1K
Alyson Shontell
Amazingly relatable rant on the AI anxiety we all feel
Packy McCormick@packyM

AI is very weird for me because normally I'd be the guy who'd argue that it's crazy we're not more excited about this miracle technology, but I completely get this sentiment. AI companies have clearly botched telling the story. That's a big piece of this. Telling people, "We built this thing that is definitely going to take your job and hopefully we can figure out how to give you handouts or something on the other side, or come up with even better jobs or whatever, say thank you" is clearly terrible messaging. Part of the issue is that what you need to say to raise tens of billions of dollars is very different from what you need to say to get the public excited. "This is definitely a better Google, it does some other cool stuff, too, and we think it's going to really help make you and your loved ones healthier" doesn't fund data centers. Then there's the gap between hype and the average person's experience with AI. Models are getting more useful for a small number of people - if you're a coder or a mathematician or someone who wants to make software but never learned to code, the last few model upgrades have felt really big. That's like ~5% of people, maybe? 2%? If you just want it to answer your questions or do your homework, it's gotten a little bit better, but it's also gotten better for everyone else, so it's not like you have a magic A+ machine all to yourself. Meanwhile, that very small group for whom it's more useful (or who at least say it's more useful because they don't want to be the one who admits it's not) is flooding the zone telling people, "If you don't use these tools as much as / as well as I do, you are completely screwed. You're going to lose your job to me and my army of bots. You (and your kids) are going to be part of the permanent underclass." If you dare question how incredible it is, you are told that you just don't get it, either because you're not smart enough, are too low agency, or don't pay for the latest paid models, which are the really good ones and don't even bother with the free stuff, you dumb poor. And you hear stories like the guy making an mRNA vaccine to fight his dog's cancer, which is awesome, and you're told that everyone will be able to have personalized medicine like that in the future, which sounds great. But like, are you, who can't even make a website with Claude Code, going to start using AlphaFold to whip up your own peptides? Are those dickbags telling you that they're going to be so much richer than you also going to live so much longer than you?? Plus, you hear creepy stories about AI encouraging people to kill themselves, and you know those people were probably unstable anyway and that AI is just a tool and it'll tell you whatever you want, but is it worth the risk? Pretending to be afraid of it might be the best way to stop it from taking your job, which, remember, all of the leaders at the big labs are promising it will do, unless you want to go be a plumber or something, work with your hands (they will not, of course, but you, you should probably seriously consider getting your hands dirty). Or maybe you're not pretending about being afraid, you actually are, which would be totally justified because the leaders of the big labs have told you to be afraid, that they're afraid, that these things are like nuclear weapons in the wrong hands and that there's a 10%? 25%? higher? chance that they'll kill us all, but it's worth the risk, because this is how society progresses. There's no turning back. "We have achieved Recursive Self-Improvement!" they squawk. "This is the big one! Humans are really and truly useless meatbags now! Ha ha!" And you're so confused, because most of the AI you actually encounter is slop. Poorly written social media posts, fake images, etc. Some of it is very funny, but if this is the stuff that's definitely going to take your job and then probably kill you, you don't quite see how? Are you that replaceable? Would you be more excited than concerned? Or would you be more concerned than excited? Personally, I'm excited, because I think LLMs are overhyped. We'll spend bajillions of dollars on inference in a Red Queen's Race, the slop will runneth over, some people will certainly lose their jobs, but a lot of things will genuinely improve, and a lot of people will end up being able to do more at their job than they can now. Plus, the non-chatbots, the models that power embodied AI and help crack biology, are showing early signs that they're going to be magical. In the past week or so, Travis Kalanick, Bob McGrew, and RJ Scaringe all said they're going to be building AI-powered factories. Yann LeCun raised $1 billion for world models to accelerate AI's impact on the physical world. Robots can play tennis now. We'll all have personal tennis coaches or coaches who teach us anything we want when we're around, and spend the rest of their days making our beds, doing our laundry, cooking healthy, delicious meals. The near future is going to be insanely cool, and different in all sorts of ways, some of which we can predict, and some of which we can't. But my god you weirdos need to stop shilling your dystopian fantasies to the people if you ever want them to feel more excited than concerned.

English
0
1
4
3.3K
Alyson Shontell
One of my favorite stories we reported when I was at BI took about 6 months to do. It was the untold story of how @travisk really got ousted from Uber. We went to pains to learn all sides when most of the press narrative had been, “he’s a jerk, he deserves it”. Instead we wanted to know how the most powerful founder in the world, who had almost total control of the company, got pushed into deciding to step down from the company he loved? A true investor/founder/employee game of thrones. businessinsider.com/travis-kalanic…
English
7
14
170
26.4K
Alyson Shontell retweetledi
Teddy Schleifer
Teddy Schleifer@teddyschleifer·
I spent the last few months talking to people around The Giving Pledge about a bygone era of philanthropy. There is an attack campaign against the Pledge led by none other than Peter Thiel. My reported essay for NYT Sunday Business is out today.
Teddy Schleifer tweet media
English
16
116
370
42.9K
Alyson Shontell retweetledi
FORTUNE
FORTUNE@FortuneMagazine·
“We are in a techno-economic war with China," @vkhosla told Fortune Editor-in-Chief @ajs in the latest episode of @Fortune500: Titans and Disruptors of Industry. bit.ly/4u7rEgR
English
0
3
4
4K
Alyson Shontell
Alyson Shontell@ajs·
A lot of times in business being the first mover can be a disadvantage. MySpace did not beat Meta. Napster and pandora did not build Spotify. Could that happen to OpenAI? Vinod gave a good reflection when I asked him that, but reminded me a lot comes down to the founder themself, and why he bet on Sam (who did not have a hugely successful track record to make it an obvious thing to do).
FORTUNE@FortuneMagazine

In the latest episode of @Fortune500: Titans and Disruptors of Industry, Fortune Editor-in-Chief @ajs sits down with OpenAI investor @vkhosla, who shares his thoughts on who’s winning the AI race—and where OpenAI sits in the competition. bit.ly/4u7rEgR

English
2
2
6
6.6K
Alyson Shontell retweetledi
Jim Edwards
Jim Edwards@Jim_Edwards·
Today Fortune publishes its investigation of the extent of Jeffrey Epstein's influence inside the top echelons of Microsoft. It is astonishing stuff. Here are some of the highlights:
Jim Edwards tweet media
English
2
8
28
8K
Alyson Shontell retweetledi
Eva Roytburg
Eva Roytburg@eva_roytburg·
Today @FortuneMagazine published my investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's operation inside Bill Gates' inner circle. How did a convicted sex offender collect $1 million negotiating Microsoft's No. 2 executive's exit? Pay for Gates' reported mistress' rent, visa, and school? Have a Gates Foundation insider threatening Gates with "blue dress" emails and joking she could "auction his body fluids on eBay?" Gates said he walked away from Epstein in 2014, but Epstein was still emailing him for "reimbursement" in 2019.
Eva Roytburg tweet media
English
2
9
13
4.5K
Alyson Shontell retweetledi
Rohan Paul
Rohan Paul@rohanpaul_ai·
By roughly 2030, AI will be capable of outperforming humans in 80% of jobs across all sectors, from blue-collar work to highly skilled professions like medicine and engineering. "Whether you're a physician, whether you're a radiologist, whether you're an accountant, whether you're a chip designer, or whether you're a salesperson, AI will do your job better. There will be an interim period where every professional will have four AI interns they're training to leverage themselves. I think the initial model of AI deployment will be AI interns working for somebody who's already a senior accountant, a physician, or pick your chip designer. But what happens when all labor is free? The abundance of goods and services will be very, very large. Prices will be very low. So I would suspect by 2040, even $10,000—will buy much more than you can buy if you have a $100,000 income today." ~ Vinod Khosla, Co-founder of Sun Microsystems & Billionaire Silicon Valley venture capitalist. --- From 'Fortune Magazine' YT Channel
English
95
98
490
82.3K
Alyson Shontell retweetledi