alemty.eth
5.4K posts

alemty.eth
@alemty_eth
Fundador de Alemty DAO Pionero de Web 3.0, Realidad Aumentada y Computación Espacial. BTC - ETH - AERO - OVR - IOTA 👁️

Ethereum helped move crypto forward for the better Be thankful that smart contracts & deflationary economics were invented by ETH years ago Unfortunately, there has been no innovation since then ETH is now dying, so we must move to chains that can support our aspirations! 🔥

My self-sovereign / local / private / secure LLM setup, April 2026 vitalik.eth.limo/general/2026/0…

🚨 ¡Así se vé la mestruación!: Video explica la evolución de la mestruación y lo que "sufren" las mujeres durante ese periodo.





THIS IS INSANE 🚨 DeepSeek is now up to 50x CHEAPER than OpenAI and Anthropic for AI tokens. DeepSeek’s latest permanent 75% price cut pushed some inference costs down to fractions of a cent per million tokens. AI companies charge based on input tokens, output tokens, cached tokens and reasoning tokens. 1 BILLION output tokens costs approximately, $3,480 in DeepSeek, $30,000 in OpenAI GPT-5.5 and $15,000 in Claude Sonnet. That’s why enterprises are panicking, A coding agent can burn millions of tokens PER DAY. If 10,000 engineers each consume 10 million AI tokens per day, annual costs could range from just MILLIONS with DeepSeek to BILLIONS with OpenAI or Anthropic models. Microsoft is reportedly cancelling most Claude Code licenses internally and pushing engineers toward its own cheaper GitHub Copilot tools instead, while Uber already used it's entire year AI budget by April due to heavy usage by it's engineers. The smarter AI models become, the longer they think, the more tokens they generate and the more compute they burn. Reasoning AI models secretly generate massive internal tokens before replying, meaning a visible 5,000 token response can actually consume 20,000 to 100,000+ effective reasoning tokens. That’s why OpenAI is pushing mini models, Google is pushing Flash and Anthropic is aggressively optimizing token caching. The biggest problem with AI may not be how smart it is, but how expensive it becomes at scale. In the future, the winners may be the companies that offer good enough AI at the cheapest cost.




















