Alpha Esq

1.8K posts

Alpha Esq banner
Alpha Esq

Alpha Esq

@alpha_the_dev

Software Developer, Law Graduate and Alpha Male

Future Katılım Kasım 2023
835 Takip Edilen547 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Alpha Esq
Alpha Esq@alpha_the_dev·
You are speaking truth here, but let me add something many won't say out loud. These men shout "virgin or nothing" because they know exactly how they moved in their younger days. They chased girls, disvirgined some, enjoyed the thrill, then moved on without looking back. Now that age is catching up and they want to settle, they suddenly remember family name and legacy. They fear bringing home a woman whose past mirrors their own wild years. Deep down, they worry about comparison, about whispers, about the day their wife might throw their history back at them in anger. But here is the part that stings. They still expect full fire in the bedroom after marriage. No dry season, no excuses, no "I am tired" for long. They want the experience of a woman who has known nothing, yet the performance of one who has seen everything. That is where the real contradiction sits. The unexpected truth? Many of these same men were once the reason some girls lost their way. They pressured, they promised, they collected, then disappeared when responsibility knocked. Now they want untouched purity as if the market is still fresh. Tell me this, if you have eaten from every plate before, why act shocked when your own plate no longer looks special? At the end of the day, every man must look himself in the mirror and decide what standard he truly kept. Because the woman you choose will live with the consequences of the life you lived before her. Think about that before the next loud demand.
Àgbà John Doe@jon_d_doe

The reson why some men are shouting "virgin or nothing" is because of the awful things that they have done with different women. Men a big hypocrites. And most of them are not ready to be in a sexless relationship. End.

English
13
44
321
19.7K
Alpha Esq
Alpha Esq@alpha_the_dev·
@f_jxr_ Let me just be your side dude I will tell your man (((added teary eye emoji)))
English
0
0
0
10
Alpha Esq
Alpha Esq@alpha_the_dev·
@VERITY_HQ You fit get tattoo, Emeka fellowship brother go give your girl doggy
English
1
0
2
110
veriTY™️
veriTY™️@VERITY_HQ·
Bro to bro : get a tattoo on your arm if you think women take your calm look for granted to make them think you’re a bad boy.
English
14
6
90
2.1K
Alpha Esq retweetledi
Benkingsley Nwashara
Benkingsley Nwashara@Benking443·
10 common misconceptions people make about laws. 1. “Self-defence means you can do anything once someone attacks you.” The force used must usually be reasonable and proportionate to the threat. 2. "It’s not fraud if no money was eventually collected.” Attempted fraud and obtaining by false pretence are still criminal offences even if the plan fails. 3. “A verbal agreement is not legally binding.” Many verbal agreements are enforceable in court. The problem is usually proving them. 4. “If a girl follows you to a hotel, consent is automatic.” Completely false. Consent can be withdrawn at any time, and absence of resistance is not consent. 5. “You can beat a child because they’re your child.” Parental discipline has legal limits. Abuse and excessive violence can become criminal offences. 6. “A boyfriend or girlfriend automatically owns gifts after breakup.” Some gifts are legally final once given, unless fraud or conditions were attached. 7. “Registering a business name means your brand is fully protected.” Business registration is different from trademark protection. Someone can still legally own the trademark to the same name. 8. “Once you pay a freelancer, you automatically own the work.” False. Unless the agreement says otherwise, the creator may still own the intellectual property rights. 9. “If somebody sends money to your account by mistake and you spend it, it’s free money.” False. Keeping or spending mistakenly transferred funds can lead to criminal and civil liability.
English
1
13
10
781
Richardinho
Richardinho@Richard3753·
That your Nonvirgin babe you're praising, and worshipping the ground she walks on, and also spent over N7million for wedding expenses. See the way they pounded her 👇👇
English
11
19
67
6.5K
Alpha Esq
Alpha Esq@alpha_the_dev·
It may look like I’m just being lazy, but the truth is simple and a bit uncomfortable. AI is already doing better work in software development than most living developers can manage when it comes to pure coding. What used to take hours of sitting down and writing line after line of code can now be done in seconds. You just describe what you want in plain English, and the system generates it. Functions, APIs, even full modules. Clean, fast, and ready to run in most cases. So what does that leave for developers? The job is no longer about writing code. That part is slowly becoming the least important skill. The real work now is understanding how systems connect. How the frontend talks to the backend. How the database is structured and accessed. How services interact, how they fail, how they scale, and how everything fits together into one working system. Programming is shifting from writing syntax to understanding structure. And this is where people miss the point. AI can generate code, yes. But it does not understand responsibility. It does not care if a system crashes in production. It does not understand business pressure, user frustration, or the cost of failure. That burden still sits with the human building the system. So the real job of a developer now is not typing code. It is making decisions. It is system thinking. It is knowing what should exist, how it should be arranged, and what trade-offs are acceptable. That is why I say, if you think computer science is just about learning how to code, then that mindset is already outdated. Coding is no longer the hard part. It is no longer the advantage. Even outside software, this same pattern is spreading. Law, medicine, engineering, design, architecture. Anything built on structured thinking and repeatable output will feel the impact. But the point is not that humans become useless. The point is that the skill is moving upward. From execution to understanding. From writing to deciding. From building pieces to designing systems.
Ugochukwu Madu@UgochukwuCFR

I was casually having a conversation with a 5th-year Computer Science PhD candidate, and I told him that if I were to start a second degree, it would be in Computer Science. He asked why, and I said it’s because I’d love to become a software developer. He smiled and said, “Bro, don’t waste your time. Just get a Claude subscription, and you can build literally anything.” He saw the shock on my face and continued, “I have spent more than 10 years earning a bachelor’s, master’s, and PhD in Computer Science, but AI writes better code than I’ve ever written and probably ever will write. Just vibe-code, don’t waste your time, bro. AI got you covered.” I tried to explain why I think someone with a background in let’s say programming, software engineering, algorithms, system design, debugging, or other core computer science skills would be a better vibe coder than someone with zero coding experience. But he insisted that the game is ultimately won by the best prompt writer. Still thinking about this🤔.

English
1
1
3
547
Alpha Esq
Alpha Esq@alpha_the_dev·
It may look like I’m just being lazy, but the truth is simple and a bit uncomfortable. AI is already doing better work in software development than most living developers can manage when it comes to pure coding. What used to take hours of sitting down and writing line after line of code can now be done in seconds. You just describe what you want in plain English, and the system generates it. Functions, APIs, even full modules. Clean, fast, and ready to run in most cases. So what does that leave for developers? The job is no longer about writing code. That part is slowly becoming the least important skill. The real work now is understanding how systems connect. How the frontend talks to the backend. How the database is structured and accessed. How services interact, how they fail, how they scale, and how everything fits together into one working system. Programming is shifting from writing syntax to understanding structure. And this is where people miss the point. AI can generate code, yes. But it does not understand responsibility. It does not care if a system crashes in production. It does not understand business pressure, user frustration, or the cost of failure. That burden still sits with the human building the system. So the real job of a developer now is not typing code. It is making decisions. It is system thinking. It is knowing what should exist, how it should be arranged, and what trade-offs are acceptable. That is why I say, if you think computer science is just about learning how to code, then that mindset is already outdated. Coding is no longer the hard part. It is no longer the advantage. Even outside software, this same pattern is spreading. Law, medicine, engineering, design, architecture. Anything built on structured thinking and repeatable output will feel the impact. But the point is not that humans become useless. The point is that the skill is moving upward. From execution to understanding. From writing to deciding. From building pieces to designing systems.
English
1
0
1
257
Ugochukwu Madu
Ugochukwu Madu@UgochukwuCFR·
I was casually having a conversation with a 5th-year Computer Science PhD candidate, and I told him that if I were to start a second degree, it would be in Computer Science. He asked why, and I said it’s because I’d love to become a software developer. He smiled and said, “Bro, don’t waste your time. Just get a Claude subscription, and you can build literally anything.” He saw the shock on my face and continued, “I have spent more than 10 years earning a bachelor’s, master’s, and PhD in Computer Science, but AI writes better code than I’ve ever written and probably ever will write. Just vibe-code, don’t waste your time, bro. AI got you covered.” I tried to explain why I think someone with a background in let’s say programming, software engineering, algorithms, system design, debugging, or other core computer science skills would be a better vibe coder than someone with zero coding experience. But he insisted that the game is ultimately won by the best prompt writer. Still thinking about this🤔.
English
52
19
185
31.2K
Alpha Esq
Alpha Esq@alpha_the_dev·
@_empighalo The issue is how much do they pay, the country is hard
English
1
0
3
1.1K
joel ESQ.
joel ESQ.@_empighalo·
Many young lawyers are sleeping on the law firm of FRA Williams. It is a great place to work. But I guess everyone wants "top tier" experience.
English
7
5
112
9.5K
Alpha Esq
Alpha Esq@alpha_the_dev·
If you’re talking about how people try to influence the sex of a child, one of the most common ideas is timing around ovulation. The belief is simple. If your wife is expected to ovulate around the 30th of May, then having sex very close to that time, like the 29th or even the exact day of ovulation, is thought by some people to slightly tilt the chances toward having a boy. The reasoning behind it is this popular sperm theory. People say the Y sperm, the one linked to a male child, is faster but doesn’t last long in the body. While the X sperm, linked to a female child, is slower but more durable and can survive longer. So the thinking goes like this: if you time it very close to ovulation, the egg is already ready, and the faster Y sperm may get there first before it dies off. That is why people believe it can increase the chance of a male child. But at the end of the day, it’s still just theory. Nothing guaranteed. Nature doesn’t really follow neat rules like that. At best, it’s just one of those methods people have talked about for years, not something that gives you control over the outcome.
Neo Officiall@neo_officialll

Everybody just dy born girl. Doctors in the house need to educate us on the necessary styles we need to do to be able to birth "male" sons. Is there a particular time of day or the female cycle when it needs to happen?. Any particular size of penis needed for such task?.😣

English
0
0
0
149
Alpha Esq
Alpha Esq@alpha_the_dev·
If you’re talking about how people try to influence the sex of a child, one of the most common ideas is timing around ovulation. The belief is simple. If your wife is expected to ovulate around the 30th of May, then having sex very close to that time, like the 29th or even the exact day of ovulation, is thought by some people to slightly tilt the chances toward having a boy. The reasoning behind it is this popular sperm theory. People say the Y sperm, the one linked to a male child, is faster but doesn’t last long in the body. While the X sperm, linked to a female child, is slower but more durable and can survive longer. So the thinking goes like this: if you time it very close to ovulation, the egg is already ready, and the faster Y sperm may get there first before it dies off. That is why people believe it can increase the chance of a male child. But at the end of the day, it’s still just theory. Nothing guaranteed. Nature doesn’t really follow neat rules like that. At best, it’s just one of those methods people have talked about for years, not something that gives you control over the outcome.
English
0
0
0
202
Alpha Esq
Alpha Esq@alpha_the_dev·
Any married woman that is constantly posting herself online for attention is an attention addict. Call it whatever you want, but that is what it is. A woman that constantly needs validation from random men on the internet is not satisfied with quiet attention from her husband alone. She wants the gaze of strangers. She feeds on it. And men need to stop pretending they do not understand what is going on. A woman that is always posting sultry pictures, half naked pictures, breast out, backside out, seductive poses every single week is not doing it for “confidence.” She is not doing it for “self expression.” She is fishing for attention. Simple. Facebook, Snapchat, TikTok, Instagram, X, it does not matter. The platform is irrelevant. The mentality is the same. Once somebody becomes addicted to external validation, especially male attention, that mentality does not magically disappear because she got married. A lot of men are naive about this. They think marriage automatically changes human nature. It does not. If a woman enjoys constant attention from men before marriage and builds her identity around it, marriage alone will not suddenly turn her into a private and disciplined person. And this is why many modern relationships are unstable. Too many people are addicted to attention. Social media has turned validation into a lifestyle. Every picture is a performance. Every post is bait for compliments, thirst comments, and private messages. A woman that constantly advertises herself online for male attention is not displaying wife behavior. She is displaying attention seeking behavior. Those are two different things entirely.
Àgbà John Doe@jon_d_doe

For me though, any married woman that is more concerned about her looks on social media, where she is always posting herself and acknowledging compliments from men is a woman that can easily be slept with. Leave that behavior for single women. You're out of the market. End.

English
0
0
0
44

Keşfet

@f_jxr_ @VERITY_HQ @Donjaytrix001 @Richard3753 @guzu_p @UgochukwuCFR @the_rebel44 @dairyofamari