Aly Capital

I Got Scammed by @fundingpips 🚨 So I’m Documenting My Next $200,000 Challenge. After what happened with Funding Pips over the weekend, I’ve decided to do something different. No more arguments. No more emails. No more back and forth. I’m starting a new $200,000 Hola Prime Challenge and documenting everything publicly. Every trade. Every setup. Every entry. Every exit. Today was Day 1. ✅ Bought the account ✅ Logged in ✅ Took the first trade ✅ Closed +3% Whether I pass or fail, the entire journey will be public. Part 1 is now live on YouTube. Let’s see what happens.

😳🚨 Funding Pips Called Me A Cheat and Suspended Me. Then Refunded Me. (EVIDENCE ATTACHED) @Khldfx @avikkfp @ErkanOriginal @fundingpips Over the last week I’ve been publicly documenting my experience with Funding Pips. I purchased a $200,000 Two Step Pro challenge. I purchased a $100,000 Two Step Pro challenge. I passed Phase 1. I passed Phase 2. I was then accused of reverse trading and had my accounts terminated. What followed was a wave of public accusations. The CEO publicly stated that the matter had been resolved. The co-founder publicly stated: “We protect the ones who trade straight from the ones who cheat and cry when caught.” I was publicly labelled as a rule breaker. I was publicly labelled as a cheat. Large prop firm pages repeated the claims. The entire narrative became that Funding Pips had already solved the case and that the evidence was overwhelming. Yet today I have received confirmation that both of my challenge fees are being refunded. Let that sink in. For days I was told the matter was resolved. For days I was told the evidence was clear. For days I was told the accusations were justified. Now Funding Pips is sending my money back. So what exactly was resolved? Because from where I’m sitting, the only thing that has been resolved is that the company has decided to refund the trader they spent days publicly accusing. The damage has already been done. The CEO spoke. The co-founder spoke. Community pages spoke. Thousands of traders saw the accusations. Very few will see the refund. I genuinely believe no trader should be publicly labelled a cheat before a company is prepared to stand behind that decision completely. If Funding Pips was so confident, why not allow me to continue? Why not provide the Master Account? Why refund me at all? Instead, the accounts remain terminated and my money is being returned. I’ll take the refund. But the trading community deserves to see the full timeline. A trader passes Phase 1. Passes Phase 2. Gets publicly accused. Gets called a cheat. Gets told the case is solved. And then gets refunded. Draw your own conclusions.

𝘿𝙚𝙖𝙧 𝘾𝙀𝙊 𝙤𝙛 𝙁𝙪𝙣𝙙𝙞𝙣𝙜𝙋𝙞𝙥𝙨, 𝙄 𝙧𝙚𝙨𝙥𝙚𝙘𝙩𝙛𝙪𝙡𝙡𝙮 𝙧𝙚𝙦𝙪𝙚𝙨𝙩 𝙮𝙤𝙪 𝙥𝙚𝙧𝙨𝙤𝙣𝙖𝙡𝙡𝙮 𝙧𝙚𝙫𝙞𝙚𝙬 𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙨 𝙘𝙖𝙨𝙚 𝙛𝙤𝙧 𝙛𝙖𝙞𝙧𝙣𝙚𝙨𝙨 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙩𝙧𝙖𝙣𝙨𝙥𝙖𝙧𝙚𝙣𝙘𝙮. FundingPips terminated all 4 of my accounts, including 2 funded accounts, based on an alleged reverse trading violation. Out of 279 completed trades, only 1 trade was flagged. The evidence provided raises serious questions: • No proof that the masked account belongs to me • No proof of ownership, control, or coordination • “Same IP” was claimed, but no actual IP was disclosed • Lot size data was hidden • No pattern of reverse trading was shown across the other 278 trades If reverse trading was genuinely part of my strategy, why was only 1 trade identified out of 279? I fully support fair rule enforcement. However, closing 4 accounts—including funded accounts—based on a single trade comparison with an unidentified account, without transparent supporting evidence, deserves further explanation. I’m not asking for special treatment. I’m asking for evidence. I asked for clear, detailed justification including trade evidence and account linkage proof. The reply confirms a violation but provides no specific evidence. I am attaching screenshot for reference. @Khldfx @avikkfp @ronna256 @fundingpips @PropFirmMatch @PropFirmMedia @Myforexfirms @fundingpipsmod #FundingPips #PropFirm #FundedTrader #ForexTrading #XAUUSD #TradingTransparency

😳🚨 Funding Pips Called Me A Cheat and Suspended Me. Then Refunded Me. (EVIDENCE ATTACHED) @Khldfx @avikkfp @ErkanOriginal @fundingpips Over the last week I’ve been publicly documenting my experience with Funding Pips. I purchased a $200,000 Two Step Pro challenge. I purchased a $100,000 Two Step Pro challenge. I passed Phase 1. I passed Phase 2. I was then accused of reverse trading and had my accounts terminated. What followed was a wave of public accusations. The CEO publicly stated that the matter had been resolved. The co-founder publicly stated: “We protect the ones who trade straight from the ones who cheat and cry when caught.” I was publicly labelled as a rule breaker. I was publicly labelled as a cheat. Large prop firm pages repeated the claims. The entire narrative became that Funding Pips had already solved the case and that the evidence was overwhelming. Yet today I have received confirmation that both of my challenge fees are being refunded. Let that sink in. For days I was told the matter was resolved. For days I was told the evidence was clear. For days I was told the accusations were justified. Now Funding Pips is sending my money back. So what exactly was resolved? Because from where I’m sitting, the only thing that has been resolved is that the company has decided to refund the trader they spent days publicly accusing. The damage has already been done. The CEO spoke. The co-founder spoke. Community pages spoke. Thousands of traders saw the accusations. Very few will see the refund. I genuinely believe no trader should be publicly labelled a cheat before a company is prepared to stand behind that decision completely. If Funding Pips was so confident, why not allow me to continue? Why not provide the Master Account? Why refund me at all? Instead, the accounts remain terminated and my money is being returned. I’ll take the refund. But the trading community deserves to see the full timeline. A trader passes Phase 1. Passes Phase 2. Gets publicly accused. Gets called a cheat. Gets told the case is solved. And then gets refunded. Draw your own conclusions.

Hey @alycapital_ We checked with the team @fundingpips We always cross verify stuffs man People keep focusing on “1 trade out of 42” while ignoring the full picture. That single trade generated $6,830, covered 57% of the profit target, was the trade that helped complete the evaluation, occurred against an opposite-position account sharing the same IP footprint, and both positions were managed in near-perfect synchronization. No prop firm bans traders over one random trade. It’s the combination of synchronized opposite positions, shared connections, and the impact of the trade on the account outcome that raises red flags. Risk controls and anti-abuse rules exist to protect legitimate traders. If firms don’t enforce them, the entire funding model becomes vulnerable to exploitation. You can check mate we are based on fairness and transparency Thanks propfirmexposee.

The confusion regarding trader @alycapital_ had been cleared by the @fundingpips team. One reverse trade out of 42 may seem minor, but additional evidence shows otherwise. On 8 June, the trader’s account shorted gold while a second account went long on the same pair. Both positions were held in parallel for nearly two hours and closed just 4 seconds apart. His side profited $6,830 ,covering 57% of the $12k target on a $200k evaluation and completing it as the final trade. He also shared an IP address with the trader on the opposite side of that trade. Combined with his IP activity across 12 cities and 8 countries in just 30 days including UK, Indonesia, Switzerland, Netherlands, Japan, Norway, Hong Kong, and Singapore, this indicates opposite account trading a prohibited strategy.. Thanks to @avikkfp @ErkanOriginal @Khldfx addressing the false allegations.

Nothing to Fix, @ErkanOriginal replied A fact is I have 3M traders and payout 12M on a avg a month, total payouts +260M dollars. And I have an absolute zero tolerance for BS, btw FYI that trader didn’t even have a master account but Evals, so please, talk facts first rather than just run it around. x.com/erkanoriginal/…

I AM INNOCENT. PROVEN WITH EVIDENCE 🚨 @fundingpips IS A SCAM CONFIRMED The co-founder of @fundingpips @ErkanOriginal accused me of being a cheat, reverse trader and “crying when caught” Now refunds me. Their latest email states: “Kindly note that the violation identified on your account is not related to reverse trading between your own accounts” Basically, they didn’t want me to have a master account as i only ever invested once with them. I passed the $200k and $100k evaluations, was publicly accused of reverse trading, and had multiple prop firm pages repeat those allegations. Today, Funding Pips refunded both of my accounts. The CEO said the matter was solved. The COO implied I was a cheat who had been caught. Now they’re sending my money back. The accusations were public. The refund is public too. Its obvious @fundingpips is a scam and only refunded me after my post getting attention.