𝚊𝚍𝚛𝚒𝚊𝚗 孟安典

20.1K posts

𝚊𝚍𝚛𝚒𝚊𝚗 孟安典 banner
𝚊𝚍𝚛𝚒𝚊𝚗 孟安典

𝚊𝚍𝚛𝚒𝚊𝚗 孟安典

@amonck

I write 7 THINGS. amonck 🦋 | anmonck 🧵

Europe Katılım Ocak 2008
3.3K Takip Edilen10K Takipçiler
Daniel Steinmetz-Jenkins
Daniel Steinmetz-Jenkins@daniel_dsj2110·
In your opinion, what is the best intellectual history book written since 2000.
English
139
100
813
339.2K
𝚊𝚍𝚛𝚒𝚊𝚗 孟安典
“The title dissolves into the function. The function dissolves into the system” is so clearly LLM. Self is very ill, but he appears to be using AI to keep his voice – “smack yourself, not the puppy” – and as scaffolding it works. I don’t agree with it, but is clearly “him.”
Will Self@wself

x.com/i/article/2054…

English
1
0
0
150
𝚊𝚍𝚛𝚒𝚊𝚗 孟安典 retweetledi
Financial Times
Saudi Arabia floats Middle Eastern non-aggression pact with Iran ft.trib.al/1duJYW1
English
110
1.1K
4.4K
3.4M
𝚊𝚍𝚛𝚒𝚊𝚗 孟安典 retweetledi
Gerard Baker
Gerard Baker@gerardtbaker·
More 4D chess nonsense. You think Xi is taken in by the flattery and "gives ground" to Trump because he tells him how much he respects him? Simpler explanation: Trump desperately needs China's help now unlike in his first term and thinks making nice will do it.
Melissa Chen@MsMelChen

Everyone who is up in arms about Trump "kissing Xi's ass" needs to understand that this is realpolitik and dealmaking. Trump is, by a mile, the most aggressive president America has had against the CCP in modern history. No one else imposed sweeping tariffs on Chinese goods, banned Huawei from domestic networks, put the entire CCP military-linked ecosystem on the entity list, restricted semiconductor exports, strengthened the Quad, and publicly called out China's currency manipulation, IP theft, forced tech transfers, and South China Sea aggression the way he did. Pre-presidency Trump was blunt. If you recall, as a candidate, he often complained about how "China was screwing us over." Literally in 2016 on the campaign trail, he said that "China is raping us." You need to understand that this posture completely shattered what was bipartisan elite consensus at the time - which was that more engagement with China on economic terms would liberalize and democratize China (ethnocentric projection once again), and that as China became more integrated into the global system, they would act more and more like responsible stakeholders. Every President since Nixon pushed closer economic integration while ignoring the OBVIOUS signs. This was especially supercharged under Bush, Clinton and Obama (but not Biden). And yet at the time, the mainstream media painted him as a xenophobe for this kind of rhetoric. It wasn't even a subtext - they directly alluded to how Trump was being racist against the Chinese for calling out their unfair trade practices. Once in office, Trump refined it into a strategy that actually moved the needle while dialing back his strong rhetoric. The personal flattery - calling Xi a "great leader," talking up respect for China, saying they'll have a "fantastic future together," is all Machiavellian Art of the Deal stuff. Flattery costs nothing and makes the other guy more willing to give ground without looking like he's folding domestically. The CCP's entire system is built on the leader's prestige. Publicly humiliating Xi or treating him like a subordinate would make him dig in, rally nationalists, and push him to retaliate harder just to save face. I don't actually think Trump knows about Chinese "honor culture" and the obsession with mianzi (face), but for whatever reason, Trump instinctively understands authoritarian psychology and how to work with it. The problem is that intellectual types, especially those steeped in liberal internationalist frameworks, tend to struggle with parsing the difference between rhetoric vs. revealed preferences. They're hard-wired to overweight the former. They treat diplomatic language as a window into the soul, as if it maps directly onto intent rather than as front-facing tool of statecraft. China weaponizes this brilliantly. It's a lesson everyone should've learned by now. With Trump, ignore the optics and ignore what he says. Just look at his actions, and look at his results.

English
29
16
67
12.7K
Izabella Kaminska
Izabella Kaminska@izakaminska·
Sometimes I think l should do a podcast. Then I remember I tried to do a podcast and managing and editing it was a headache. And bloody hell everyone has a podcast these days. And I already hate the sound of my own voice. And performance is incredibly variable based on whether I am having menopausal symptoms or not. But also the case that sometimes it’s just easier to articulate complexity via some other medium. Perhaps there is a better way. Not sure what it is. I’m currently quite inspired by the stand in front of a white board and pretend to understand deep truths about how the world really works model, while lecturing to an invisible audience. But then I think about the prep notes. Although the scribbling on the board would be quite fun.
English
14
2
68
5.4K
𝚊𝚍𝚛𝚒𝚊𝚗 孟安典
It’s my strong opinion that team offsites, better internal comms, and open plan office space would transform British politics.
English
0
0
0
103