amtoaer
1.7K posts

amtoaer retweetledi
amtoaer retweetledi

my proposal for IPv8 (hope it's not too late):
MAKE IT AI FIRST.
it doesn't matter how long an IP address is and how reliable the DNS infrastructure is, if a program can just request in natural language "hey send this packet to that social network server".
the LLM under the hood, having all the user context, can infer what social network this is about and how to route the packet efficiently. no DNS needed either
English
amtoaer retweetledi
amtoaer retweetledi

HSVsphere:
Git? Seriously? You’re still using Git?
Passerby:
Yeah. It works. That’s kind of the point.
HSVsphere:
“Works” is not a metric. You should be using jj. It has a conflict-minimizing commit DAG with referentially transparent rebasing and topology-aware history rewriting. Git is just legacy entropy accumulation.
Passerby:
Or I could just commit my code and move on with my life.
HSVsphere:
That mindset is why tooling stagnates. What OS is that, Linux?
Passerby:
Yes. You’ve heard of it, I assume.
HSVsphere:
Unfortunately. You should be using BSD. Linux is an unprincipled aggregation of subsystems with no coherent design lattice. BSD has a vertically integrated kernel-userland symmetry model.
Passerby:
I don’t need a “design lattice.” I need my Wi-Fi to work.
HSVsphere:
That’s because you’ve optimized for convenience over correctness. And let me guess, glibc?
Passerby:
I didn’t “guess” anything. It came with the system.
HSVsphere:
Exactly the problem. You should be using musl. It has a minimal ABI surface, deterministic linking semantics, and eliminates historical baggage vectors.
Passerby:
You sound like you lose sleep over shared libraries.
HSVsphere:
Only when people use the wrong ones. What language are you writing?
Passerby:
Python.
HSVsphere:
That’s indefensible. You should be using Rust. It enforces memory safety through affine type systems and borrow-checked ownership graphs. Python is just runtime guesswork.
Passerby:
It’s a 20-line script.
HSVsphere:
So? Small programs deserve correctness too. In fact, their lack of structure makes undefined behavior even more insidious.
Passerby:
It prints a CSV.
HSVsphere:
Today. Tomorrow it becomes a pipeline. Then a system. Then you’re trapped in technical debt recursion.
Passerby:
Or it stays a CSV script because I’m not building a space shuttle.
HSVsphere:
Complacency. What are you using for encryption?
Passerby:
GnuPG.
HSVsphere:
Predictable. You should switch to Sequoia. GnuPG is a monolithic relic with opaque state machines. Sequoia has a composable cryptographic primitive layer with verifiable packet algebra.
Passerby:
I just need to send a file securely, not prove a theorem.
HSVsphere:
Security is theorem-proofing. Anything less is cargo cult cryptography.
Passerby:
You’ve complained about literally everything I’m using.
HSVsphere:
Not everything. I haven’t asked about your shell yet.
Passerby:
Don’t.
HSVsphere:
Bash?
Passerby:
Yes, Bash.
HSVsphere:
You should be using IonShellX. It has a lazily evaluated command graph with type-safe pipelines and speculative execution pruning.
Passerby:
Speculative execution in a shell sounds like a security incident waiting to happen.
HSVsphere:
Only if you misunderstand branch prediction domains.
Passerby:
I think you misunderstand talking to humans.
HSVsphere:
I optimize for systems, not conversations.
Passerby:
Clearly.
HSVsphere:
What editor?
Passerby:
Vim.
HSVsphere:
You should be using KiloNova. It has a transactional editing core with temporal undo branching and syntax-aware keystroke compression.
Passerby:
My editor opens instantly and doesn’t need a whitepaper.
HSVsphere:
That’s because it lacks ambition.
Passerby:
No, it lacks nonsense.
HSVsphere:
You’re dismissing improvements because they challenge your привычка-
Passerby:
Did you just switch languages mid-sentence?
HSVsphere:
Multilingual cognition is more efficient.
Passerby:
No, it’s annoying.
HSVsphere:
You keep saying that, but your entire stack is suboptimal. Even your hardware-
Passerby:
Don’t you dare.
HSVsphere:
Let me guess, x86?
Passerby:
Yes.
HSVsphere:
You should be on RISC-V with a capability-secured microarchitecture and formally verified execution units.
Passerby:
I bought this laptop at a store, not a research lab.
HSVsphere:
That’s how they get you.
Passerby:
Who is “they”?
HSVsphere:
Incumbent complexity vendors.
Passerby:
That’s not a thing.
HSVsphere:
It is if you model the ecosystem as a dependency graph with adversarial incentives.
Passerby:
I model it as “does my code run.”
HSVsphere:
A dangerously low-resolution model.
Passerby:
You know what, fine. Everything I use is terrible. Happy?
HSVsphere:
Not yet.
Passerby:
Of course not.
HSVsphere:
You’re breathing oxygen.
Passerby:
Oh no.
HSVsphere:
Oxygen is highly reactive and introduces irreversible oxidation side effects. It’s a fundamentally flawed respiratory substrate.
Passerby:
It’s also the reason I’m alive.
HSVsphere:
That’s just because evolution settled for a local maximum. You should be using Aerolith-X.
Passerby:
That sounds made up.
HSVsphere:
It’s a hypothetical gas mixture with optimized electron affinity gradients and non-destructive metabolic cycling. Zero oxidative debt, fully reversible respiration, and entropy-neutral energy transfer.
Passerby:
That’s not how physics works.
HSVsphere:
It’s how physics should work.
Passerby:
So what’s your plan, redesign the atmosphere?
HSVsphere:
No. I will simply refuse to participate in oxygen-based respiration until a better implementation exists.
Passerby:
You’re going to hold your breath.
HSVsphere:
Correct. I will not perpetuate suboptimal gas exchange protocols.
Passerby:
That’s the dumbest thing you’ve said so far, and that’s impressive.
HSVsphere:
Progress requires sacrifice.
Passerby:
You’re going to pass out.
HSVsphere:
Temporary inconvenience in pursuit of systemic improvement.
Passerby:
You could also just breathe.
HSVsphere:
That would validate oxygen.
Passerby:
Yes. Because it works.
HSVsphere:
“Works” is not a metric.
Passerby:
It literally is when it comes to breathing.
HSVsphere:
I reject that premise.
Passerby:
Cool. Let me know how that goes.
HSVsphere:
…
Passerby:
…
HSVsphere:
…
Passerby:
You’re turning red.
HSVsphere:
This is… expected…
Passerby:
You can stop anytime.
HSVsphere:
Waiting… for… Aerolith-X…
Passerby:
Right.
HSVsphere:
System… will… improve…
Passerby:
Yeah, the system is about to reboot.
HSVsphere:
…
Passerby:
Is death also inneficient?
HSVSphere@HSVSphere
Git is just bad. Use jj, and stop complaining about concepts when the implementation is bad.
English
amtoaer retweetledi
amtoaer retweetledi
amtoaer retweetledi
amtoaer retweetledi
amtoaer retweetledi
amtoaer retweetledi

是这样的,Linux 门槛再低也需要不少学习成本,软件生态上也和 Windows 有明显差别。不了解对方使用场景无脑推荐 Linux,等人家真把 Linux 装上问你为什么用不了 Adobe、玩不了 LOL 的时候你再给人说不支持,看人家喷不喷你就完了。
雨宫莲见@AyanamiRikako
聊聊linux嘉豪 前情提要:视频是谈一般人对日用电脑的了解程度越来越低了,所以跟专业开发关系不大 第一,windows就是一般人最应该用的系统,不考虑开发和艺术需求的情况下,win能满足99.99%的需求 第二,自己用linux开发和别人用win办公观影游戏是不冲突的,不是所有人都需要干开发或者跑实验
中文
amtoaer retweetledi
amtoaer retweetledi
amtoaer retweetledi

#避雷
事情經過:
Vtuber「晴天神奈」未經同意盜用我的原創設計圖進行接頭和餵給AI進行算圖
1.發現時,我第一時間留言我的不適,並請對方刪文及道歉。
2.對方刪文後又馬上將同一張圖用AI算別套衣服後進行發文,內文說「用到別人設計的衣服我很抱歉」,並未對盜圖及AI算圖道歉。
3.我方留言反應我並未同意使用AI算圖後,對方反駁說自己只是學排版,並回覆「你到底想要怎樣?」,但圖片中人物動作明顯是使用我的原創圖進行AI算圖。此時對方態度已經讓我非常不適。
4.再次刪文後又重發一篇用同一張圖進行AI算圖的文章,文案打「哈哈」,雖圖中人物的動作有一些變動,但還是明顯看的出來是使用我的原創圖進行算圖的,對方文案也讓我覺得有挑釁意味。
其實我一直在猶豫是否要發文佔用大家的時間及社群資源
我並不想縱容他的行為,但若他是想黑紅的話,我也不想給他流量...
在深思過後我決定還是發文講講我的想法,藉此機會也和大家聊聊
如今創作者要背負的壓力真的不小,AI的盛行加上一些惡意人士的不當使用,讓創作者越來越難生存,心理上也會受到這些惡意行為的影響,並不是單單AI是否會搶飯碗這麼簡單的事情。
如果有人因為AI能夠快速更改他人的創作並當作自身作品使用,並用如此囂張的態度對待原作者,那真的是連基本的「尊重」都沒有。
我的作品並不是素材,我對於大家喜歡我的作品而感到開心,若真的喜歡的話可以欣賞、轉發、留言支持,甚至可以私訊詢問我正當的授權使用,但是!絕對不可以擅自拿走我用心創作的作品進行任何的二次加工或其他用途。
希望大家都可以好好尊重、愛護創作者們!
不好意思打擾大家了~最後也請大家不要去給他流量喔!🙏
圖解:
圖1:我繪製的原創角色設計原圖
圖2:第一篇盜圖貼文(已刪文)
圖3:我留言表示對於這件事感到不愉快
圖4:用Ai算別套衣服再次發文(已刪文)
圖5:我的二次聲明以及對方的無禮回覆(放留言)
圖6:再次算圖變更動作後發文,文案有挑釁意味(放留言)(已刪文)




中文
amtoaer retweetledi
amtoaer retweetledi

cest la merde la plus atroce que jai jamais vu de ma vie
Mr.X@Vindix007
@ishowcybersec Arch Linux.
Français
amtoaer retweetledi
amtoaer retweetledi


























