Andreas (Nishikawa-)Pacher retweetledi

Our preferred (part) solution to preserve anon review: use alternative titles & abstracts
"Imagine a preprint goes viral on a social media platform...Many of the invited reviewers will have already seen—and indeed read—the submitted manuscript and know the authors’ identities."
Nathan Ballantyne@nathanballan
Researchers often complain about peer review. I stopped complaining and wrote a paper w/ @JaredCelniker. More blinded review is good, we argue, because it enhances science’s impartiality and credibility. The article is open access—check it out! cambridge.org/core/journals/…
English





















