andy5ive

Wow, so look what I found, calling themselves the OWNER of CedarDAO! I guess she had it planned all along.

BREAKING: Iran's Speaker of the Parliament Ghalibaf says President Trump made "seven claims in one hour, all of which were false." Speaker Ghalibaf says: 1. The US "did not win the war with these lies, and they will certainly not get anywhere in negotiations either" 2. "With the continuation of the US blockade, the Strait of Hormuz will not remain open" 3. Passage through the Strait of Hormuz will be conducted based on the "designated route" and with "Iranian authorization" 4. "Whether the Strait is open or closed and the regulations governing it will be determined by the field, not by social media" 5. "Media warfare and engineering public opinion are an important part of war, and the Iranian nation is not affected by these tricks" This statement came after markets closed for the weekend, following the S&P 500's fastest recovery since 1982. We expect to receive a US response soon.

Massive anti-Orban rally in Debrecen, Hungary, once an Orban stronghold, ahead of tomorrow’s critical election🇭🇺 WOW

To all Cedar holders, I know the situation may feel quite serious right now. But the reality is that everything in life is fixable. What matters is how we respond as a community, and whether we choose to rebuild a supportive and constructive environment in time for the launch of Atlas. Because Atlas changes everything for this project. The path forward is actually quite straightforward. Over the past few days the community has spoken very clearly about its concerns regarding how the project is currently being run by a single individual. In my view, that individual has been in clear breach of the mandate originally given by the former management committee to progress the project toward becoming a functioning DAO. For that reason, the right thing to do would be to step down before the situation escalates further. Once that happens, the immediate priority should be stabilisation. Right now our social platforms have effectively been taken over by people who actively seek to damage both Cedar and Atlas. Moderation has collapsed. Genuine supporters have been driven away, and the environment has become dominated by hostility, misinformation, and deliberate attempts to undermine the project. As a community, we are quite literally paying to maintain platforms that are currently causing material damage to our own project and token value. That situation cannot continue. Those platforms need to be paused, cleaned up, and returned to their original purpose. Our community owns those platforms and funds them. They exist to support genuine token holders and the success of the project. They do not exist as an open stage for people who are openly hostile to Cedar and Atlas to dominate the conversation and drive supporters away. Restoring order, proper moderation, and a constructive environment within our community spaces must be one of the first steps in putting Cedar back on a stable path. Once those initial steps are taken and the current torrent of FUD has been stemmed and removed from our community spaces, we can then turn our attention to the future of the project. When I first raised the idea of moving Cedar toward true community ownership and governance, the vision was an idealistic one. In practice, that version of the model has clearly not worked. That reality should not discourage us, but it should encourage us to simplify and refocus. Going forward, the committee should represent one thing above all else: the interests of the community and the success of our core product, Atlas Wallet. The role of the community should be simple: to support the success of Atlas. Atlas is the product that ultimately gives Cedar its value, and the strength of the community should be directed toward helping that product succeed. The short-term price of the Cedar token is largely irrelevant. The long-term value of Cedar rests on the success of Atlas, and our focus should remain firmly on that objective. For that reason, the mandate of the committee and the DAO should be simplified. The committee should exist to represent and organise the community in ways that support Atlas, without unnecessary complexity, without attempting to manufacture new utilities, and without spending money that does not directly benefit the project. Governance should remain simple and practical. Voting should be limited to essential matters such as: • electing or replacing committee members • deciding how dividends are distributed if and when they are received • approving community initiatives that genuinely support the ecosystem Beyond that, there is no need for complicated governance structures or constant voting cycles. The goal should be a focused, stable community that supports Atlas and allows the project to grow. For now, the priority must be clarity and alignment. One community. One purpose. One product. Our task is to create the most positive and supportive environment possible for the launch of Atlas. If we do that, the vision many of us shared when this project began can finally start to become reality. Everything is still ahead of us.

Investigation into potential criminal conduct from Cedar DAO interim committee Background On 14 August 2025, 98% of voters approved a very specific wage proposal. The proposal named individual staff members and set their weekly wages. It was explicitly communicated to the community that these would be the only wages paid by the project, and that committee participation itself was a voluntary role. nation.io/a/CedarDAO_/pr… To go back further, the Legacy Operations wallet was funded 291 days ago, on 18 May, with $161,030: bscscan.com/tx/0x555b707dc… It also received 400 BNB (approximately $251,279), bringing total funding to approximately $412,309 at today’s value: bscscan.com/tx/0x80b4372ce… Today the wallet contains 117 BNB (approximately $73,832.88) and $61,410 in stablecoins, totalling roughly $135,242. That represents a reduction of approximately $277,067 in just ten months. And this is only the BSC operations wallet. Thousands more have also been spent from the project’s SOL-based operations wallet. Funds have been moved from the Legacy BSC operations wallet: bscscan.com/address/0x3ccc… to this intermediary wallet: #tokentxns" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">bscscan.com/address/0x8e55… and then on to three recipient wallets. Only three wallets have been receiving salaries for the last several months. We have now been made aware that these belong to two committee members and one community team member. Wallet 1 This wallet was originally receiving $225 per week. 92 days ago it received $1,125 63 days ago it received $1,500 37 days ago it received $1,500 9 days ago it received $1,500 This effectively increased the payment to $281.25 per week for four weeks and then to $375 per week for the last three months. bscscan.com/address/0x8b09… Wallet 2 This wallet followed the same pattern of increases. bscscan.com/address/0x82e6… Wallet 3 This wallet began receiving $1,500 payments (equivalent to $375 per week) 63 days ago and has received three payments of $1,500. bscscan.com/address/0xF2ce… In addition, 92 days ago four payments of $1,125 were made. This payment structure was never disclosed to the community and was never authorised by any DAO vote. Conclusion Just over 100 days after the community explicitly authorised wages for specific personnel performing specific roles, several of those personnel were unilaterally dismissed without any DAO vote. Their wages were then redirected to two committee members and one additional staff member. The amounts being paid to those three individuals are approximately 67% higher than the wage originally authorised by the DAO for community work, with committee work itself being strictly voluntary, and unpaid. The defence offered is that “a lawyer”, paid for by the community, advised one committee member that she was permitted to do this. The other committee members state they have not seen this legal advice. Legal considerations Regardless of whether someone claims to have received legal advice, the actions described above raise serious potential legal issues. Independent review suggests the following risks may arise depending on jurisdiction and legal structure: Misappropriation of funds Treasury funds authorised for specific recipients and purposes appear to have been redirected without governance approval. Embezzlement Individuals entrusted with control of community funds may have diverted those funds for personal compensation without authorisation. Fraud or misrepresentation If the community was told that only the approved wages would be paid while different payments were being made privately, that may constitute fraudulent conduct. Breach of fiduciary duty Committee members exercising control over treasury funds may owe fiduciary duties to the community. Redirecting those funds for personal benefit without authorisation could constitute a breach. Unjust enrichment Receiving financial benefit from funds that were never authorised for those recipients may also create civil liability. Key point One committee member claims that an unnamed lawyer advised that these actions were permissible. However, independent research strongly suggests that unilaterally dismissing staff, redirecting treasury funds, and increasing personal compensation without a DAO vote exposes those responsible to significant legal risk. If a lawyer the community is paying for has really given this advice, then I urge the remaining members of the committee to publish the lawyer's name, the name of their firm, the jurisdiction they are licensed to practise law, and copies of the specific communications in which this advice was given.

A woman who has accused both Trump and Epstein of sexually assaulting her when she was a minor decades earlier gave four interviews to the FBI. Summaries of three of those interviews were not released with the Epstein files. @ByMikeBaker @migold nytimes.com/2026/02/25/us/…

$BTC Ended up sweeping the lows below ~$101K and bounced back up. Bulls would want to retake the $106K-$107K area to get back into the previous range and in proximity of the all time highs. The $100K-$101K level is key to stop this from testing down to the mid 90s I'd say.

$TOTAL It took a lot of chopping around but we've got the Total Market Cap breakout. This was mostly led by $BTC as the majority of alts have struggled to keep up. Bitcoin dominance almost sitting at the cycle highs again.

Bitcoin climbing on low volume could mean more people aren't willing to sell at these levels while others aren't willing to buy here either, probably hoping for a pull-back which hasn't eventuated after 43 days from the April low, leaving a few people to buy, ie price goes up! 🔥

I've published a new Altcoin Newsletter 🔥 I share my charts & analysis on 6 Altcoins These Altcoins are $RIO $XLM $TIA $ADA $DOT $NEAR I share an Altcoin Newsletter like this every Friday Sign up & read here: newsletter.rektcapital.co/altcoin-newsle… #BTC #Crypto #Bitcoin

$TOTAL Crypto Market Cap with a clean retest and breakout. Now trading back at the local highs above the $3T+ area. The real test will be the $3.7T area which has capped price previously. All we want to see now is higher highs and higher lows locally to get us there. It won't go up in a straight line.

#BTC Bitcoin has rejected from the Lower High resistance (black diagonal) Going forward, Bitcoin will need to hold the $93.5k Range Low to fully confirm a reclaim of the Range $BTC #Crypto #Bitcoin

#BTC Bitcoin Dominance has one final leg left in its Macro Uptrend on the road to 71% (red) Any dips into 64% would constitute a retest Successful retest would enable final trend continuation on the road to 71% (green box) $BTC #Crypto #Bitcoin

#BTC Bitcoin has rallied to the black Lower High resistance within its Range Trade the next move with Phemex which has: • Best-in-class liquidity & security • Full spectrum of pro features Join easily with my exclusive link: phemex.com/a/k/rekt $BTC #Bitcoin

$BTC Exchange reserves keep trending down at a rapid pace. This has really accelerated since the election and during price range. Eventually this should lead to a supply crunch yet again as we've seen so often. Once central banks start heavily injecting liquidity again. BTC is usually soon to follow.

BREAKING: KRAKEN CAUGHT A NORTH KOREAN HACKER TRYING TO STEAL IT'S #BITCOIN THIS IS WILD!!

Bitcoin breaks out, but USDT dominance continues to find support. Something has to give soon; either this is a BTC fakeout or USDT.D breaks down and FOMO joins the party. 🎈

"US hairdressers and aestheticians report clients are opting for less expensive services and canceling appointments—worrying signs that US consumers are retrenching," per Bloomberg.

TRUMP: He had MS-13 on his knuckles, tattooed! MORAN: That was photoshopped TRUMP: Terry, they're giving you the big break of a lifetime. I picked you. But you're not being very nice.