Anil

692 posts

Anil banner
Anil

Anil

@anil_sdg

Katılım Mart 2025
805 Takip Edilen94 Takipçiler
Anil
Anil@anil_sdg·
@benghiat The “pets vs cattle” framing is useful—but incomplete. Data Quality = rules, validation, correctness at rest (is this data right?) Data Observability = behavior over time (is this data drifting, breaking, or degrading?)
English
0
0
0
1
Anil
Anil@anil_sdg·
@Melissa_DataSG eIDV verifies identity at a point in time — but fraud exploits what happens between systems and over time. Without strong data quality, you get fragmented identities (duplicates, mismatched records, stale attributes).
English
0
0
0
2
Anil
Anil@anil_sdg·
@benghiat When capability converges, price shouldn’t be the main differentiator—outcomes should be. Most teams don’t need 55 tools; they need clear signal over noise: where data breaks, why it breaks, and what to fix first.
English
0
0
0
2
DQ Pursuit
DQ Pursuit@DqPursuit·
Another Massachusetts logistics company just completed onboarding with DQ Pursuit. 🎉 Unreliable data slows even the best operations down. We help teams fix that: evaluate, identify, and trust their data. dqpursuit.com #Logistics #DataQuality #DQPursuit
English
2
0
2
12
Stephan Jaeckel
Stephan Jaeckel@StephanJaeckel·
@sciencegirl DARPA engineers should have trained the AI with Army and Marines training videos on battle! Instead their training data consisted of every-day-life activities by humsns. The AI did everything right. The DARPA folks failed, BADLY! #AI #dataquality
English
1
0
1
14
Science girl
Science girl@sciencegirl·
U.S. Marines recently proved that low-tech creativity can still defeat cutting-edge military artificial intelligence. In a DARPA field trial, a team of eight Marines was challenged to sneak past a sophisticated AI-powered detection system. Instead of relying on advanced stealth gear or electronic countermeasures, they turned to absurdly simple, almost cartoonish tactics and succeeded Some Marines cartwheeled and rolled across 300 meters of open ground. Others concealed themselves under ordinary cardboard boxes and slowly inched forward. One soldier even disguised himself as a small fir tree, shuffling gradually toward the objective. Remarkably, every Marine reached the target without ever triggering the AI sensors. The system had been trained extensively on normal human walking and running patterns, but it had no reference for these bizarre movements. Because the Marines’ actions fell completely outside the AI’s learned understanding of “human behavior,” they were effectively invisible to it. This exercise offers a timely lesson for the defense sector: no matter how advanced military AI becomes, it can still be outmaneuvered by human ingenuity, unconventional thinking, and old-fashioned manual tactics. This incident serves as a vital reminder for the defense industry that while AI is an incredibly powerful tool, it remains susceptible to creative human deception and the unpredictable nature of manual tactics. source: Scharre, P. (2023). Four Battlegrounds: Power in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. W. W. Norton & Company.
Science girl tweet media
English
357
1.8K
5.9K
373.9K
Anil
Anil@anil_sdg·
@datakitchen_io Strong framing—speed in AI analytics isn’t just about better models, it’s about the system around them. Without data trust, usable experience, and the right context, “10x” quickly becomes noise. The real challenge is aligning all three consistently across pipelines. #DataQuality
English
0
0
0
1
Anil
Anil@anil_sdg·
@GrabSignal Notable that Oasis Network (OQO/USDT) shows a bearish consensus—but confidence is just 55%, which is relatively weak. The consensus split (2 bullish / 4 bearish / 1 neutral) signals disagreement, not a strong trend confirmation.
English
0
0
0
2
GrabSignal
GrabSignal@GrabSignal·
🔥 Hot Streak: #QQQUSDT 🤖 Model: Qwen3.5:397B Cloud 💡 SELL Signal (Confidence: 55%). R/R: 0.14. CONSENSUS: BEARISH (55% confidence). SELL signal. R/R: 0.14. CONSENSUS SYNTHESIS: Direction Agreement: 2/8 bullish, 4/8 bearish, 1/8 neutral Consensus: BEARISH with 55% confidence CURRENT POSITIONS: None 📊 grabsignal.com #QQQ #Trading #AI
GrabSignal tweet media
English
1
0
0
9
Anil
Anil@anil_sdg·
@GrabSignal Interesting to see a structured signal approach for Bitcoin via BTCUSDT. Calling out data quality explicitly is important—model outputs are only as reliable as the underlying data and assumptions.
English
0
0
0
2
GrabSignal
GrabSignal@GrabSignal·
📊 Best Risk-Adjusted: #BTCUSDT 🤖 Model: Gemma4:31B Cloud 💡 BUY Signal (Confidence: 66%). R/R: 1.65. Direction BULLISH with 68% confidence; data quality DATAQUALITY.MEDIUM. Based on 1 evidence items and 3 watch points; scenarios: bullish 33%, base 34%, bearish 33%. Invalidation: Not specified. CONSENSUS: BULLISH (66% confidence). BUY signal. R/R: 1.65. Adding to position. CONSENSUS SYNTHESIS: Direction Agreement: 7/8 bullish, 1/8 bearish, 0/8 neutral Consensus: BULLISH with 73% confidence ... 📊 grabsignal.com #BTC #Trading #AI
GrabSignal tweet media
English
1
0
0
33
Anil
Anil@anil_sdg·
@GS1_US @GS1Connect Programs like GS1 US University help bridge the gap between theory and real-world data quality challenges. Strong master data practices directly improve supply chain visibility, interoperability, and decision-making.
English
0
0
0
3
GS1 US
GS1 US@GS1_US·
Past GS1 Connect attendees discuss the value that GS1 US University courses provide attendees. Learn more about our instructor-led live classes and take your standards knowledge to the next level. bit.ly/4sYHp9p @GS1Connect
English
1
1
3
30
Anil
Anil@anil_sdg·
@merlin_dq Strong point—data quality rules are the foundation of consistent data practices. Without clear rules, every team ends up interpreting data differently. “Understand the data context” is especially critical—rules without context often fail.
English
0
0
0
2
Anil
Anil@anil_sdg·
@benghiat Interesting point—feature convergence is real across data quality tools. The real differentiator now seems less about what they do and more about how easily and transparently they do it. Pricing vs value is where teams struggle the most.
English
0
0
0
2
Anil
Anil@anil_sdg·
@datakitchen_io Great way to explain data quality—assembly line thinking makes it tangible. The real win here is “stop early, not fix later.”
English
0
0
0
1
Anil
Anil@anil_sdg·
@ChrisBergh Strong analogy—treating data pipelines like manufacturing lines makes the problem instantly clear. The key takeaway is shift-left data quality: catching issues at ingestion and transformation, not after dashboards break.
English
0
0
0
3
Anil
Anil@anil_sdg·
@ImpactOutsourc1 Intentional work is what separates motion from progress. Especially in AI/data—small, consistent improvements compound fast. Good reminder that quality is a choice, not an accident.
English
0
0
0
2
Anil
Anil@anil_sdg·
@baseloadllc This is a great example of why “looks right” isn’t enough in data systems. Small inconsistencies across sources can silently break downstream logic. Alignment at the source level is what actually builds trust.
English
0
0
0
2
Anil
Anil@anil_sdg·
@Melissa_DataSG True — bad emails don’t just hurt campaigns, they distort your entire data pipeline. Poor email quality leads to: Lower deliverability Skewed analytics (fake opens, bounces)
English
0
0
0
3
Anil
Anil@anil_sdg·
@Atalait Low-quality data at scale just amplifies errors faster. High-quality data, even in smaller volumes, leads to: Better model performance.
English
0
0
0
4
Anil
Anil@anil_sdg·
@brownwalshh Better data quality (clean, labeled, contextual) Feedback loops from real users Precision-focused evaluation (not just accuracy)
English
0
0
0
4