antirez

41.7K posts

antirez banner
antirez

antirez

@antirez

Reproducible bugs are candies. I like programming too much for not liking automatic programming.

Sicily, Italy Katılım Mayıs 2007
762 Takip Edilen49.6K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
antirez
antirez@antirez·
My second short story release in English is ready: Tales of Illustrious Computer Scientists: Iola Varga, nun and computer scientist. invece.org/iola.html
English
4
8
105
94.7K
antirez
antirez@antirez·
Mario can tell you: in Austria it is *even* worse, it's not an Italian problem. My brother @DarioSanfilippo moved to Austria to find a system that is at least as bad, from this point of view. The commission knows about those small mafias of quasi-mandatory financial advisors and so forth.
English
2
0
2
170
antirez
antirez@antirez·
@matteocollina @badlogicgames @lucalanziani Maybe they will do a mess, but in the current proposal it is documented that you *jump* the single state procedures with this company form. I believe that the Commission point is exactly that, they know that for local interests they can't win the local battles, so they bypass it.
English
2
0
3
149
moskstraumen
moskstraumen@moskstraum21745·
@antirez You plan to automatically cut off anyone who is starting right now. Not an idea I can endorse.
English
1
0
0
130
antirez
antirez@antirez·
Clearly we need some kind of approval process to avoid the ability to open PRs for new accounts without a past GitHub contribution history and so forth. Here the problem is not LLM assisted programming per se, but agents around on the internet doing shit like that.
clem 🤗@ClementDelangue

Our biggest open-source repos are getting overwhelmed by AI slop which literally makes Github unusable (~a new pull request every 3 minutes). Fun new challenges in an agentic world!

English
17
2
68
11.1K
antirez
antirez@antirez·
@BlackOpsREPL Just require approval for accounts created >= 2023 to start. It's not hard to come up with something. The problem is now that GitHub has the times of megacorps.
English
0
0
1
238
Vittorio Distefano
Vittorio Distefano@BlackOpsREPL·
@antirez There is already a whole scene of fake accounts with generated histories from since LLMs came out, so ~2023.
English
1
0
3
235
antirez retweetledi
European Commission
European Commission@EU_Commission·
We are introducing EU Inc. To make building and growing a business across the EU faster, simpler, and smarter. 🔸 Start a company in less than 48 hours 🔸 No minimum capital requirement 🔸 Fully online and borderless
European Commission tweet media
English
609
1.2K
7.5K
2.2M
antirez
antirez@antirez·
I'm thinking that because of automatic programming certain complicated and elegant programs we wrote in the past may basically become a form of art for future generations. Like the manuscript books of the middle age for us.
English
33
30
369
19.6K
antirez
antirez@antirez·
Cito dal video da cui è stata estrapolata questa affermazione: "allora togliamo anche il latino, il greco, la matematica di ordine superiore" (dalle scuole). Il punto non è il latino in sé, ma spingere gli studenti a fare cose complicate, qualsiasi esse siano, linguistiche, logiche, eccetera, a prescindere da quanto sembrino utili poi nella pratica.
Italiano
0
0
1
50
Umberto Bertonelli
Umberto Bertonelli@drelegantia·
Il costante calo delle iscrizioni agli studi classici nelle scuole superiori italiane ha alimentato un dibattito sulla necessità di una riforma sostanziale di questo curriculum. A difesa del liceo classico, molti hanno sostenuto che esso aumenti l’apertura mentale 1/3
Umberto Bertonelli tweet media
Benedetta Frucci@BenedettaFrucci

Sostenere che lo studio del latino sia inutile nel tempo dell’intelligenza artificiale non solo è sbagliato: è esattamente l’opposto. 1) Lo studio del latino sviluppa la capacità di analisi sintattica, la capacità di distinguere funzione e forma, l’attenzione alla gerarchia delle informazioni. Sono le stesse competenze richieste per comprendere e costruire sistemi complessi, inclusi quelli algoritmici. 2) Richiede disciplina mentale e insegna a dubitare: nella traduzione si scompone la frase, la si ricostruisce, si verifica la coerenza e il significato. Tradurre è un esercizio di pensiero critico, fondamentale quando si usa una AI. 3) Molti termini scientifici, giuridici e tecnologici derivano dal latino. Capire l’etimologia significa cogliere sfumature concettuali, migliorare la qualità del linguaggio. Le materie umanistiche saranno sempre di più un bene preziosissimo. Ciò che sarà prodotto dalla mente umana sarà sempre più raro e per questo avrà un valore sempre più alto. Mettere in contrapposizione il latino e l’AI è profondamente miope. Questa è la dimostrazione che i grandi esperti di economia (o presunti tali) faticano a capire la politica. E il futuro. Perchè il latino ci educa all’intelligenza artificiale molto più di qualche professore in cerca d’autore

Italiano
9
11
220
22.5K
antirez retweetledi
Mistral AI for Developers
🔥 Meet Mistral Small 4: One model to do it all. ⚡ 128 experts, 119B total parameters, 256k context window ⚡ Configurable Reasoning ⚡ Apache 2.0 ⚡ 40% faster, 3x more throughput Our first model to unify the capabilities of our flagship models into a single, versatile model.
Mistral AI for Developers tweet media
English
86
325
2.6K
372.4K
antirez
antirez@antirez·
@rowantrollope @elianto_nL When there is to create some new system, a good starting point could be to provide both a description of the new system *and* old code: together they specify a lot of things that can completely steer the new system code generation.
English
0
0
0
41
antirez
antirez@antirez·
This. When creating a new system, you write the initial specification, composed of both a high level human language description, and even description of the exact algorithms, data structures, when it matters (I go to the level of outline the C struct and functions for Redis work). Then I iterate with the LLM, updating the spec, creating the code. The full picture is captured by both the code and the implementation itself: they say different levels of things.
English
1
0
1
71
antirez
antirez@antirez·
Biggest mistake in AI coding era: to believe that specifications should be either natural language OR something else. The best combo is a natural language high level specification (the intend), plus code (as it gets written) documenting the finer behaviors.
English
30
17
287
25.5K
antirez
antirez@antirez·
@yoemsri I agree but LLMs uncovered a lot of broken workflows... No wonder software is in general in a bad state.
English
0
0
0
257
Youssef El Manssouri
@antirez Smart developers already work this way. Intent in plain language, implementation in proper code. Best of both worlds.
English
1
0
0
281
antirez
antirez@antirez·
@optimistengr @mitsuhiko I use both Claude Code and Codex. For harder stuff I find GPT-5.3 xhigh to be more capable than Opus 4.6
English
1
0
2
163
Armin Ronacher ⇌
Armin Ronacher ⇌@mitsuhiko·
I feel like gpt-5.4 writes way too much stuff out compared to other models. Not a huge fan :(
English
38
2
176
23.8K