Cidrufdiamond ⭐⭐🇬🇧🇵🇹🇮🇱🇧🇻

178.9K posts

Cidrufdiamond ⭐⭐🇬🇧🇵🇹🇮🇱🇧🇻 banner
Cidrufdiamond ⭐⭐🇬🇧🇵🇹🇮🇱🇧🇻

Cidrufdiamond ⭐⭐🇬🇧🇵🇹🇮🇱🇧🇻

@arbronsious

Politics..showbiz for ugly people

Katılım Ocak 2020
2.5K Takip Edilen2K Takipçiler
Cidrufdiamond ⭐⭐🇬🇧🇵🇹🇮🇱🇧🇻 retweetledi
Sandy Tregent
Sandy Tregent@SandyofSuffolk·
The Green Party. I have a friend who's a councillor for the Green Party. She's a wonderful hard working woman. She helped householders whose houses were flooded a couple of years ago, stayed up all night helping them pump their houses out and move furniture; helped volunteers clear the river of debris; got all new planters and bins for the village square; attends all village events; opposes all development applications on farmland and green belt; gives immediate attention to any problems people are having; got new road signage. I could go on and on. She'd actually make a great MP. She cares about her village, her people and the environment. Unfortunately, she's not standing for re-election because her party, she says, has been infiltrated by lunatics and anti-Semites. Isn't that sad. ☹️
English
171
541
2.7K
34.1K
Cidrufdiamond ⭐⭐🇬🇧🇵🇹🇮🇱🇧🇻 retweetledi
Gully Foyle #UKTrade
Gully Foyle #UKTrade@TerraOrBust·
"So you want the UK to join the EU?" "Yes" "So you want to give up the Pound and accept the Euro" "No" "So you want to join the Schengen area and allow completely open borders" "No" "So you want to be part of the EU Migration Pact, another 100k illegal migrants to the UK a year" "No" "So you want to re-introduce the testing of cosmetics onto animals, required by EU law" "No" "So you want to re-introduce live exports of animals for fattening or slaughter" "No" "So you want to give control of UK fishing waters and quotas back to the EU" "No" "So you want to reverse the protections of UK marine birds like puffins, who were endangered due to EU overfishing of the main food source" "No" "So you want to give up the better trade relationship the UK now has with the USA, Japan, India, Australia, New Zealand, Mexico, Singapore, and countless other countries" "No" "Well it sounds like you don't want to join the EU then"
English
77
649
1.9K
54.1K
Cidrufdiamond ⭐⭐🇬🇧🇵🇹🇮🇱🇧🇻 retweetledi
Nick Timothy MP
Nick Timothy MP@NJ_Timothy·
David Lammy says judges can adopt the Government’s “Islamophobia” definition. It’s supposed to be non-statutory. But it’s clearly going to change the way the law works. That’s why we will scrap it.
English
169
1.2K
5.5K
61.7K
Cidrufdiamond ⭐⭐🇬🇧🇵🇹🇮🇱🇧🇻 retweetledi
Cidrufdiamond ⭐⭐🇬🇧🇵🇹🇮🇱🇧🇻 retweetledi
🦊The SLY Silver Fox 2.0🦊
They are about to be ripped apart. Ironic they did it to them selves.
English
117
964
1.8K
27.5K
Natasha Carter
Natasha Carter@NatashaCL7·
If you thought Trump’s joke about Pearl Harbor was funny comment here. I want to follow you!
English
1.2K
235
5.3K
56.3K
Louis Beneventi 🤌🏻
Louis Beneventi 🤌🏻@Louis_Beneventi·
Remember what this guy wants. Do not let the PR fool you.
English
9
27
147
5.7K
Cidrufdiamond ⭐⭐🇬🇧🇵🇹🇮🇱🇧🇻 retweetledi
Liam Halligan
Liam Halligan@LiamHalligan·
Check out the ten-year gilt yield this morning - after the UK's likely next Prime Minister tried to lecture international investors about the intricacies of fiscal policy and the UK's national accounts. A subject about which she clearly knows absolutely nothing. Nice one @AngelaRayner !!! Markets now demanding 4.9% per annum to lend money to the British government. In Morocco, it's 3.4%. And get this. In February 2026, the UK government a massive £14.3 billion - according to figures released this morning. No less than £13 billion of that money borrowed last month went on interest payments on existing debt. Think about that for one second - it's utterly insane. The UK's national accounts are now akin to a Ponzi scheme. And yet still, lunatic MPs and potential Prime Ministers call for ever more borrowing and spending - "because it's the right thing to do" Labour's chronic economic illiteracy and internal party-political posturing is driving the UK economy off a cliff ... ⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️
Liam Halligan tweet media
Liam Halligan@LiamHalligan

This story below reveals the true extent of Angela Rayner's cluelessness when it comes to economics, the public finances and financial markets. I say that not with glee - but deep alarm and regret. If this is really how the probable next Prime Minister of the UK thinks - betting markets put a more than 50% chance on leadership coup by June - then the ousting of Starmer/Reeves by Rayner (or Miliband) is likely to spark an instant spike in gilt yields, from their already elevated levels. Just the fact that Rayner has said what she has below will put yet more upward pressure on the market-driven borrowing costs – whatever the Bank of England says is these days mere mood – that drive the interest rates faced by firms and households. I have nothing against more social housing – on the contrary, the arguments in favour of building more are at the heart of my book "Home Truths", along with policy mechanisms that could get that done. But if you think that, in the current environment, hard-nosed international creditors do - or even should - give a monkey's about the "social benefits" of subsidised housing then you are utterly and dangerously deluded. Again, I say this in sorrow, not glee. I knew plenty of smart people at the top of successive Blair governments. The architects of New Labour – at least the Blairites – always made sure there were financially literate and market-savvy people in the room when big decisions were made. That was important back then - when the national debt Britain had to service was 35pc of GDP. Now – with the same metric pushing 100pc of GDP and Britain paying more than Morocco to borrow money – it is absolutely vital. It seems that there is no-one – NO-ONE AT ALL – near the top of today's Labour government who has the first clue about the realities of public accounts and global finance. These are – once again – NOT tribal or party-political points, but statements of cold fact ....

English
125
1.2K
2.9K
86.4K
The Old Baker
The Old Baker@The__Bakerman·
@afneil @arbronsious But you know you are trying to talk to people that if labour and Reeves burnt the economy to the ground , everybody lost their homes and every penny they had they would still back them !
English
1
0
0
28
Cidrufdiamond ⭐⭐🇬🇧🇵🇹🇮🇱🇧🇻 retweetledi
Andrew Neil
Andrew Neil@afneil·
This is not good news given what will now happen to UK finances as a result of the war on Iran. And perhaps we can have some silence from all those who piled to exaggerate the significance of January’s freak figures. The UK borrowed a higher than expected £14.3bn in February. The shortfall between government spending and income was £2.2bn higher than in the same month a year ago and far above the £8.5bn forecast by economists polled by Reuters. At a time of peril for nation’s finances it is frightening to have R Reeves as Chancellor.
English
258
1.1K
4.8K
179.8K
Cidrufdiamond ⭐⭐🇬🇧🇵🇹🇮🇱🇧🇻 retweetledi
Cllr Sam Journet
Cllr Sam Journet@ReformUKSam·
Last night, a Labour Councillor threatened me with murder. A resident threatened with violence. Then the meeting abandoned after descending into chaos. Meetings also include Police chases involving Councillors. Clearly it is time for change, it’s time for @reformparty_uk.
English
32
343
947
20.4K
Cidrufdiamond ⭐⭐🇬🇧🇵🇹🇮🇱🇧🇻 retweetledi
Subversive Force
Subversive Force@sirwg202110·
Starmer and Albanese. Submitted. Controlled. Petrified.
Subversive Force tweet mediaSubversive Force tweet media
English
207
1.9K
6.8K
49.2K
Cidrufdiamond ⭐⭐🇬🇧🇵🇹🇮🇱🇧🇻 retweetledi
Andrew Snowden MP 🇬🇧
Starmer at #PMQs wasn’t only time I had to straight-talk to try and get a straight answer this week. I asked 2 Defence Ministers if they will order British-built Typhoons. Didn’t want to answer question & deployed Starmer waffle technique. Labour take the public for fools 😡
English
112
619
2.9K
41K
Cidrufdiamond ⭐⭐🇬🇧🇵🇹🇮🇱🇧🇻
Let me get this right..A thicko and tax dodger who claimed ignorance of the process is giving fiscal talks to banks...F*** me!!!!
Steven Swinford@Steven_Swinford

Exclusive from @breeallegretti Angela Rayner has privately criticised the OBR and suggested that Labour has 'over-corrected' in the wake of the Tories In a private call with City investors organised by BNP Paribas she said that the official forecaster had failed to recognise the benefits of increased public spending Rayner attacked the scoring methodology used by the OBR, which measures the expected cost and growth gains of government policies to calculate the amount of fiscal headroom, based on the chancellor’s rules She said that the government's drive to build more social housing was considered a cost without any recognition of the social benefits She argued that the OBR is 'preventing' the government from greater public spending because it 'doesn't account for the returns' properly Expect this to be a growing fault line as the elections in May approach thetimes.com/uk/politics/ar…

English
0
0
0
14
Cidrufdiamond ⭐⭐🇬🇧🇵🇹🇮🇱🇧🇻 retweetledi
Liam Halligan
Liam Halligan@LiamHalligan·
This story below reveals the true extent of Angela Rayner's cluelessness when it comes to economics, the public finances and financial markets. I say that not with glee - but deep alarm and regret. If this is really how the probable next Prime Minister of the UK thinks - betting markets put a more than 50% chance on leadership coup by June - then the ousting of Starmer/Reeves by Rayner (or Miliband) is likely to spark an instant spike in gilt yields, from their already elevated levels. Just the fact that Rayner has said what she has below will put yet more upward pressure on the market-driven borrowing costs – whatever the Bank of England says is these days mere mood – that drive the interest rates faced by firms and households. I have nothing against more social housing – on the contrary, the arguments in favour of building more are at the heart of my book "Home Truths", along with policy mechanisms that could get that done. But if you think that, in the current environment, hard-nosed international creditors do - or even should - give a monkey's about the "social benefits" of subsidised housing then you are utterly and dangerously deluded. Again, I say this in sorrow, not glee. I knew plenty of smart people at the top of successive Blair governments. The architects of New Labour – at least the Blairites – always made sure there were financially literate and market-savvy people in the room when big decisions were made. That was important back then - when the national debt Britain had to service was 35pc of GDP. Now – with the same metric pushing 100pc of GDP and Britain paying more than Morocco to borrow money – it is absolutely vital. It seems that there is no-one – NO-ONE AT ALL – near the top of today's Labour government who has the first clue about the realities of public accounts and global finance. These are – once again – NOT tribal or party-political points, but statements of cold fact ....
Steven Swinford@Steven_Swinford

Exclusive from @breeallegretti Angela Rayner has privately criticised the OBR and suggested that Labour has 'over-corrected' in the wake of the Tories In a private call with City investors organised by BNP Paribas she said that the official forecaster had failed to recognise the benefits of increased public spending Rayner attacked the scoring methodology used by the OBR, which measures the expected cost and growth gains of government policies to calculate the amount of fiscal headroom, based on the chancellor’s rules She said that the government's drive to build more social housing was considered a cost without any recognition of the social benefits She argued that the OBR is 'preventing' the government from greater public spending because it 'doesn't account for the returns' properly Expect this to be a growing fault line as the elections in May approach thetimes.com/uk/politics/ar…

English
64
500
1.4K
132.4K
Cidrufdiamond ⭐⭐🇬🇧🇵🇹🇮🇱🇧🇻 retweetledi
Danny Kruger
Danny Kruger@danny__kruger·
Nick Timothy and Nigel Farage are right, and Sadiq Khan and Keir Starmer are wrong. Small groups of people, of whatever religion, praying in public places is fine. And as a Christian country we should allow a special privilege for churches to lead services in our national spaces, like the Palm Sunday celebration that happens in Trafalgar Square. What we don't want is mass ritual observances intended to claim the civic realm for another religion, or assert the domination of another culture over our own Christian traditions. What happens in our national spaces is not neutral. People use Trafalgar Square, for celebrations and demonstrations, to make a point about the kind of country they want us to be. The Palm Sunday pageant reminds us of who we are - not as individuals (many or most of us don't identify as Christians at all) but as a national community, with the roots of our institutions in the ground of the Bible and our most solemn communal moments, from coronations to funerals, mediated through the liturgies of the Church. A mass Adhan held there, or in any town square, is making a different point: that Britain is not a Christian country, and that - inshallah - one day it shall be Muslim. This is unacceptable to the British public and indeed incompatible with our constitution. As ever with these debates, the issue is partly one of kind and partly one of degree. There is an issue with Islam itself as a religion which in most interpretations does not admit of pluralism or freedom of conscience, and therefore is inherently aggrandising, including over territory. But with a bit of confidence and a bit of toleration we could handle that - if it were not for the issue of degree. It is the scale of Islam in Britain, and the ambition of its leaders for greater scale, that makes the problem. The numbers of people who assembled for the adhan in Trafalgar Square, clearly and openly claiming the territory for a faith with no connection (indeed, with strong doctrinal disagreement) with the model of Western liberal democracy that Britain has developed and exported to the world - that is the problem. The numbers, whether everyone there understood it this way or not (and I suspect many did), convey an explicit threat to the foundations of our country. Being relaxed about other people's religion is a good thing, a very British thing. I don't mind modern druids dancing around Stonehenge in my constituency (arguably, though the historicity is tenuous, they have a claim to the place). I don't mind small groups of Hindus or Buddhists or Muslims demonstrating the reality of Britain's religious toleration by worshiping in Trafalgar Square. But let's not kid ourselves about this adhan, or pretend that we're just seeing another harmless expression of Britain's religious diversity. We are seeing an abuse of liberalism, led by people who are not themselves liberal; or - let us imagine they are acting in good faith - who are themselves deceived about what they are doing. It should not happen again. And it would be good to hear the Church of England say so.
English
641
1.2K
5.2K
303K
Cidrufdiamond ⭐⭐🇬🇧🇵🇹🇮🇱🇧🇻 retweetledi
Liza Rosen
Liza Rosen@LizaRosen0000·
British MP Nick Timothy introduces a bill to protect freedom of speech and tells Muslims who cry ‘Islamophobia’ to shove it: Muhammad is a false prophet. British people are not bound by Islam or its Sharia laws. Do you agree with this MP? Yes or No?
English
851
2.7K
13.2K
139.8K