Dr Roberts

@JoshuaBarzon I'd take the next flight

Where would you sit?

@natalimorris @American90291 The fact that an unknown scoundrel like Scofield could have his "Bible" pubs by Oxford Univ Press was reason enough to raise serious questions. Thanks for making his story available to a wider audience Natali.

@American90291 To be clear, I wasn’t able to establish Untemyer himself funding the book. He was among the elites who introduced Schofield to his funders and to Oxford. One of the main funders was a Wall Street real estate tycoon named Alwyn Ball Jr. Thank you for sharing this!

Natalie Morris reveals the Scofield Bible was orchestrated by elite Zionist Samuel Untermyer. They secretly funded a fake preacher to completely hijack American Christianity. The establishment manufactured a fake theology to brainwash millions for Israel. @natalimorris

@natalimorris @sappholives83 Is that for real? Or another hoax? Who knows anymore!

@sappholives83 I need to have never known this.

There are trans-identifying men who freeze tomato sauce into cylinders to shove up their backsides so that when it melts, they can pretend that they’re having their period. But no, this is definitely not a fetish… or a mental health issue.

@LostMyHats @TexasPreacher RJ Rushdoony, in his book Sovereignty, describe it this way: " A dour group of men who endlessly preach the 5 points of Calvinism to each other..."

100%. Spot-on. If you'll allow me to opine, I've thought a lot about this. I stopped visiting Reformed churches when traveling, precisely because the preaching is so abysmal. It's depressing. And frankly, the congregations are almost all dead because of it (I'm sure there are exceptions). But I think it's for the following reasons: 1. Many "reformed" pastors - and churches - are first generation. They are so caught up on the novelty of it (novel to them) that they beat the same doctrines into the ground over...and over...and over. It's not really preaching. It's doctrinal show-and-tell. It's an hour-long, "Here's what we believe that makes us unique" doctrinal yard sale where you just lay out your beliefs on the sidewalk and show everyone each week. Good sermons show the doctrine in the course of preaching, but a 50-minute lecture about doctrine each week is being done *instead of* a sermon. 2. Because of that, instead of doing what preaching is uniquely called to - exulting God - it exults in doctrines about God. There's a difference. It becomes an academic exercise. 3. Speaking of that, many Reformed pastors act as though the sermon is nothing but a book report they've prepared from their week's study. Like the sermon is a dossier of their scriptural research notes. I've heard them say things surprisingly close to that. They think their job primarily is to study (which is accurate, plus prayer), but they think that means their job is to go to the pulpit and puke up all that knowledge from a week of study into an hour-long sermon. What results is a horrible sermon with 63 points, 12 sub-points, and 4 parts, preached over the next 4 weeks, all from two of Paul's run-on sentences. It's absolutely painful to listen to. 4. The expository preaching emphasis has gotten out of hand, and I say that as someone who believes that expository preaching is the best, preferred, normative, and most biblical method of preaching. What I mean is, Reformed preachers will brag about having a 92-week sermon series from Romans 9, as thoughly they're in a competition for how slowly they can through a passage. That's not how the Scripture was meant to be received. It loses power when you preach a sermon for every single word, and you've taken so long that by the end of the sentence, you've no idea what the verse is, but you know the definition of each word and how to pronounce it in Greek. It's an exercise in missing the forest for the trees. So congregations are hearing Romans 9 (or whatever) stretched out to so many weeks, they don't comprehend any longer how it fits together in any coherent way they can comprehend. 5. Reformed preachers have over-corrected the wheel on shunning practicality. They dont' want to do the self-help thing that typical evangelicals do, so they shun any practical application, and it just becomes a message that is all indicative and no imperative. A good sermon as both. "Because of THIS, we must do THAT." They think that's a compromise or something. But what it is is not meeting the practical needs of the congregation, and they're starving because, despite the food set before them, you never let them chew it. 6. This is the biggie, saved the best for last. Reformed preachers stopped believing in "unction" along the way. We're so concerned about Strange Fire (cessationist speaking, btw), we run from the concept of 'anointing' because it sounds charismatic, and unction is just around the corner from anointing. But Calvin, Whitefield, Edwards, Owen, Spurgeon et all believed in divine unction. Some men don't have it, and you know it when you hear it. "Apt to teach" doesn't only refer to Bible drill blue ribbons. If you're bad at speaking, go serve in a different way. Spurgeon emphasizes this in "Lectures to My Students." And more times than not, Reformed guys will argue that such a thing doesn't exist. I dont' think it's a coincidence that the guys who deny that unction exists have it the least. 7. That wasn't last, I lied. Reformed preachers have also largely stopped believing in "divine illumination." The Holy Scripture, when used by the Holy Ghost, accomplishes a supernatural enlightenment in the reader's mind, enabling the reader to comprehend the Text, understand it, and change the heart. If they don't believe in it, they aren't praying for it, and if they aren't praying for it, they probably won't receive it (though God can do whatever He wills). And then, the sermon will be ineffectual. 8. Hyper-cessationism stunts supernaturalism. Preaching is a supernatural work, where supernatural things are done. The moment preaching ceases to be supernatural is the moment it becomes a talk.

Most Reformed today preaching is just lecturing, not preaching. I blame it on the idolatry of the redemptive historical method. Untethered from experimental application, it leaves both saint & sinner untouched. It doesn't apply, doesn't press the conscience, doesn't woo, doesn't cut & heal, doesn’t search the heart. It's just data dumping. It's a seminary lecture in a pulpit. It comes across as either a lengthy theological paper better suited for a PhD dissertation, or vague and mushy platitudes. The result is dead orthodoxy, puffed up heads, & antinomian tendencies. That's why experimental preaching is needed more than ever in our day of cold, cozy, formal religiosity. And before you think this is a shot at everyone else, I'm talking about my own pulpit ministry as well. Lord, help us to preach a felt Christ!

Years of Work Complete — What's Inside This Greek New Testament youtu.be/ybTw9_68mgo?si… via @YouTube

@HarrisonHSmith So I am a "boomer," and agree with you, and have had this perspective since before you were born. Please be careful with sweeping generalization.

I’m a Mayflower American, 8th generation Texan, life long outspoken conservative and patriot son of a public school teacher, but somehow I’m the one suspected of ulterior motives? Y’all need to recalibrate.

@gcdugas @DrClownPhD Better yet, call in an air strike.

@DrClownPhD To bad no one had a lighter.

How do you fix this culture?

@_whitneywebb ...and note carefully how, during interviews, ex see eye ay people dodge questions they are asked.

It's infinite psyop season. The main targets are those who are unhappy with the current system, would-be dissidents. The goal is to distract them so they don't do anything real about it and divert them into a new, more convenient corral. Stay vigilant and maybe don't immediately trust the "ex"-cia people suddenly popping up telling you what you want to hear.

“I’m fed up to the ears with old men dreaming up wars for young men to die in.” —Sen George McGovern, 1972, decorated WWII combat veteran

@AceLuceroTech Looking forward to your review!

@evanmulch @TrevorFitzgibb1 @YouTube @The_JBS The JBS of today should just move its HQ to Tel Aviv.

@TrevorFitzgibb1 @YouTube Members of the @The_JBS warned Americans about this in the 1970’s. Robert Pierce wrote the book The Rapture Cult which was distributed by JBS members during that time period. youtu.be/iJJd2HwV4Uo?si…

Tucker Shocked By P. Hegseth‼️🔥🔥#usa #america #israel #palestine #iran #... youtube.com/shorts/Xtabddh… via @YouTube

@EMichaelJones1 "Hidden language of Protestantism..." That's about as accurate as saying "Pedophilia is the hidden language of Catholicism."

More Proof that Satanism is the hidden grammar of Protestantism. Christian Zionist ministers gather in the Oval Office to bless Trump's illegal, immoral war against Iran. This is the same group that blessed Israel's genocide in Gaza. Read "Walking with a Bible and a Gun" for the details. It's available at fidelitypress.org

@gcdugas Well said my friend!

@arcofthediver No, it's my words. I used his photo because in my mind he is the perfect example of being dogmatic in the right way. He never equivocated. He never shrunk back.

The modern contagion of being thin skinned comes at great expense. Not only are people easily offended and friendships severed but gospel proclamation suffers greatly. Think about it. Ministers are called to proclaim verity but they are conditioned to eschew speaking about anything dogmatically. And isn't that the greatest betrayal of Christ we can commit? To speak of His holy truth in a propositional manner? This is not some me pet peeve. The stakes couldn't be higher and we, in our modern age, by our timidity, offend Christ by failing to speak of Him with bold conviction lest we offend men whose breath is in his nostrils. Ministers need to make dogmatism great again.

@evanmulch Indeed, just too bad J R can't speak without profane, crude, dim witted language.

Rachel explains Occult Feminism so well!

@gcdugas Excellent

@DanielLMcAdams @CarriePrejean1 Marcion was the original dispensationalist.

@CarriePrejean1 Not even any of the founders of protestantism would recognize dispensationalism as being remotely Christian. It is a heresy within a heresy.

Heretical dispensationalism has attempted to hijack true Christianity. It’s time we course correct. False theology is leading to war and destruction of innocent lives. That is NOT Christianity. #reclaimchristianity is starting now.

@LostMyHats Try using GAB's Arya AI

If you want to know how deep the censorship goes, I've got a *not so easy to find* photographic copy of Entdecktes Judenthum - or "Judaism Unsmasked" - by Johann Andreas Eisenmenger (1700) that was translated into English in 1748. The originals were destroyed. Eisenmenger had spent 19 years learning Hebrew and Aramaic and studying the Talmud, Rabbinic writings, and Kabbalistic writings, and had even posed as a Jew for more than a decade (because the Talmud forbids Gentiles to read or study it, he took this tactic to learn directly at the Synagogues). He wrote an exposé of what the Talmud and the Rabbis themselves were teaching. When Jewish bankers in Frankfurt learned of his manuscript, they bribed German officials the equivalent of 4.5 million dollars to confiscate his printings and dispose of them. He died in 1704, and his book was never disseminated. It was briefly leaked a few decades later, before it was confiscated and destroyed again, and my copies are from that era. It's hard to read because of orthographic inconsistency, archaic lexis, obsolete morphological forms, and hypotactic syntax, and other misc bull hockey that makes it difficult even if it's English. So, I've paid for four different specialty AI translators that specialize in archaic English (which are NOT cheap) to occularly read the copies and put it into modern English and font. And in every instance, once the AI gets a whiff of which publication it's reading and translating, it refuses to proceed and just gives me a full bag of nopes. They won't touch it. It's pretty crazy that the censorship of that book has been going strong for 226 years, by the same people using their positions of disproportionate power and wealth to obscure the truth. No worries. I've heard that Tobias Reimschlengdecker is looking for work, so maybe he can translate it. We'll figure it out.

@DanielLMcAdams @McBrideLawNYC Thank you Daniel for pointing that out. Among the earliest critics of dispensationalism were Reformed/Calvinist scholars from Princeton Theological Seminary in the early 20th century.

@McBrideLawNYC It did not even exist in Protestantism until just over 100 years ago. It is not Protestant at all. Just a heretical cult within Protestantism. As Hare Krishna is considered an heretical cult within Hinduism.

Christian Zionism is not Catholic theology. It is an evangelical import. It entered through American media in the 1990s and smuggled dispensationalism into Catholic minds. It assigns exclusive, ongoing covenantal status to the modern State of Israel. That is not the teaching of the Church. If your Catholic parents or grandparents were watching the 700 Club and similar programs, they were being catechized outside the Church. Not maliciously, but effectively. Evangelical eschatology filled the vacuum left by weak 1990s Catholic formation. The Jewish people are beloved because God bound Himself to them in covenant and because from them, according to the flesh, came the Christ. That election is real. It belongs to God’s providence and is not revoked. But that covenant was always ordered to fulfillment in the Messiah. It reaches its completion in the New Covenant established in His Blood. That covenant is definitive. There is no parallel covenant and no salvific order apart from Christ. The Church is the Body of Christ, the sacramental reality of the New Covenant. Jew and Gentile enter on the same terms, through faith and baptism. Saint Paul speaks of one olive tree, not two. The modern State of Israel is a nation. It is not the covenant. It is not sacramental. It carries no intrinsic theological mandate. Like every state, it stands under moral law. The Jews are special because Christ took flesh from them. That is a fact of history, not an ongoing theological hierarchy. The covenant reaches its fulfillment in Jesus Christ. Outside of Him there is no covenantal life, no parallel promise, no separate path. The Church is the New Covenant in His Blood. She is the locus of salvation. Ethnicity does not determine grace. Christ does. One Lord. One faith. One baptism, in Jesus Christ.

@BasedTorba I didn't watch one bit of the entire "game."

There’s nothing confusing at all about the half time show. You are being replaced White man—and this is a humiliation ritual to mark and celebrate the occasion.