nick

741 posts

nick banner
nick

nick

@areveriii

23

Brooklyn, NY / Dallas TX Katılım Nisan 2020
687 Takip Edilen67 Takipçiler
nick retweetledi
abbie ⁺˖˚°❀.ೃ࿔*
abbie ⁺˖˚°❀.ೃ࿔*@DEEPINTHEWILL0W·
crying my eyes out wdym a silly little dog has come and sat by my feet on the train
abbie ⁺˖˚°❀.ೃ࿔* tweet media
English
90
5.5K
125.9K
902.4K
nick retweetledi
swinky
swinky@dumbassghoul·
you’re on Very thick ice with me . i love you
English
237
31.1K
280.6K
5M
nick retweetledi
fishious
fishious@fishquichee·
(Whispering to a bug) who are you
English
27
1.5K
6.9K
137.3K
nick retweetledi
💖
💖@twaniimals·
ZXX
98
4.2K
32.7K
1M
nick retweetledi
kofi anon
kofi anon@poemPilled·
Breaking no contact with the intention of marriage
English
30
943
8.1K
190K
nick
nick@areveriii·
@yuuiichive your descriptions even on their own are so good
English
0
0
13
673
yuuii
yuuii@yuuiichive·
I must remember it all
yuuii tweet media
English
218
5.1K
45.7K
799.5K
nick
nick@areveriii·
@Relaxed008 it’s so frutiger aero i love it
English
0
0
0
29
Relaxed
Relaxed@Relaxed008·
This game has legit one of the best aesthetics I've ever seen. It's what my dream game would look like.
Relaxed tweet mediaRelaxed tweet mediaRelaxed tweet mediaRelaxed tweet media
English
154
830
16.6K
951.1K
nick retweetledi
Pokémon
Pokémon@Pokemon·
🗣️ Let's get this place HUMID!
English
340
9.1K
69K
2.1M
nick
nick@areveriii·
@aimeebalthazar @smallhusk @Theolojism @tenobrus from my perspective as a scientist and not a philosopher, we cannot prove they do or do not fit the criteria for something we do not even have a consensus formal theory for.
English
1
0
1
64
a. p. balthazar
a. p. balthazar@aimeebalthazar·
@areveriii @smallhusk @Theolojism @tenobrus from a strictly solipsistic approach, there's no way to verify if anyone else is conscious. neural functionality also differs from LLMs in more than substrate. both arguments are irrelevant because by most anti-mysterian definitions, AI doesn't fit the criteria for consciousness.
English
1
0
0
52
nick
nick@areveriii·
@aimeebalthazar @smallhusk @Theolojism @tenobrus it’s absolutely not a fact. how is a brain not also modeling probabilistic relationships across billions of inputs? they are both doing inference within different substrates. we don’t actually have a way to determine if anything is conscious other than ourselves.
English
1
0
0
54
a. p. balthazar
a. p. balthazar@aimeebalthazar·
@smallhusk @Theolojism @tenobrus it's a fact that LLMs are not conscious. they are basically probabilistic equations with billions of points of data. that's why i dislike when people make threads about responses that they specifically prompted in order to get models to sound the most human. it doesn't prove that
English
1
0
1
74
nick
nick@areveriii·
@VADE_OFFICIAL all this video did was make me sad. i wanna be her friend
English
0
0
0
417
VADE RETRO SATANA
VADE RETRO SATANA@VADE_OFFICIAL·
One of the bleakest things I’ve seen, a window into the American underclass. What were they thinking releasing this? How does this help advertise your product?
Avi@AviSchiffmann

User Interview #3

English
112
456
15.5K
944.3K
nick
nick@areveriii·
@lt0gt this is incredible!!! this is exactly the kind of UX i had in mind for nested context windows but i never knew exactly how to make it usable. looking forward to the open source
English
1
0
1
181
{ I N P U T }
{ I N P U T }@lt0gt·
Still trying to stabilise radial focal tree experiment 4 and counting
English
35
110
1.1K
89.9K
nick retweetledi
sean
sean@DilettanteryPod·
If you’re having a bad day you have to find a small, round bird and look at it. Even just for 1 second
English
112
3.3K
21.1K
327.3K
nick
nick@areveriii·
@mitskidata mitski is for the pathetic gays (me)
English
0
5
23
2.6K
nick retweetledi
Chess.com
Chess.com@chesscom·
i bet you can't name something better than smothered mating.
English
476
3.4K
26.9K
1.4M