Dick Grayson
251 posts


@Scarlett1453889 This is definitely AI, cats aren’t this welcoming
English

@Scarlett1453889 Only dogs can do that. Cats are not that affectionate.
English

@Breaking57 Break fucking phones people! Grab it, smash it and walk away.
Stop trying to reason with these assholes. They need to get a life and get a job.
English

He’s filming everyone at the market, but the police say there’s nothing they can do. Whose side are you on?
A male videographer (the "auditor"), who is wearing a disguise for anonymity, is filming at an outdoor market. He is confronted by a market organizer (Kaylee Dolan) regarding his filming of vendors and attendees. A law enforcement officer arrives to mediate the dispute.
The organizer expresses concern that the videographer is making vendors and patrons uncomfortable and asks him to stop or leave. The videographer asserts his right to film in a public area, refusing to comply with her request.
The responding officer confirms that the videographer is in a public space where he has a legal right to record. The officer acknowledges the organizer's frustration but explains that, as no crime is being committed, he cannot compel the man to stop filming or force him to leave.
The tension arises from the intersection of constitutional rights and personal expectations of privacy.
Under the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, individuals generally have a protected right to film in public spaces (such as sidewalks, public parks, and plazas). This includes the right to film government officials and police officers performing their duties, as well as things that are plainly visible from those public areas.
In general, there is no "reasonable expectation of privacy" in a public space. If something can be seen by the naked eye from a location where a person is legally permitted to be, it is typically legal to photograph or record it.
While filming is a protected activity, it is not absolute. If filming crosses the line into harassment, stalking, or disorderly conduct—or if it is done to "clandestinely" capture private or intimate areas, it can become illegal. In this specific interaction, the officer determined that the videographer’s actions did not meet the legal threshold for a crime, which is why he could not intervene.
If the market were held on private property rather than public land, the owners or organizers would have the right to set rules regarding photography or to ask people to leave. If someone refuses to leave private property after being asked, they can be cited for trespassing. The officer's inability to remove the videographer suggests that the location was either public property or that the organizer lacked the legal authority to exclude him from that specific area.
English

@Breaking57 Call the police due to a private property issue. Trespass them and be done with it.
English

@brilliantbong @Breaking57 He's on a public sidewalk dumbass
English

@Breaking57 Costco lots are private property. Should have arrested him for loitering and trespassing
English

@Breaking57 People need to walk up and quickly rub lip balm on the lens of his camera, it blurs everything and is hard to get off. Please start a trend!
English

@its_The_Dr White privilege is real. Just not for the reason most people using the term think of.
English

@Breaking57 No this guy is giving her a hard time. She’s explaining things very easily and it makes sense -he’s being a jerk and he knows it. There is no reason that he needs to film the business. Get out of here
English
















