Albert Skibinski

15.4K posts

Albert Skibinski banner
Albert Skibinski

Albert Skibinski

@askibinski

Creative developer & entrepeneur. Loves to Learn new stuff. Currently helping people to repair their stuff at startup https://t.co/EZRMryluUZ!

Netherlands, Breda Katılım Mart 2007
1.3K Takip Edilen837 Takipçiler
Albert Skibinski
Albert Skibinski@askibinski·
Het Krimml Achental in Oostenrijk in het tussenseizoen. Bijna niemand. Tauernhaus is nog dicht. Heerlijk rustig.
Albert Skibinski tweet mediaAlbert Skibinski tweet mediaAlbert Skibinski tweet mediaAlbert Skibinski tweet media
Nederlands
1
0
1
25
Albert Skibinski
Albert Skibinski@askibinski·
@AlexanderNL Als je iemand die er werkt weet te strikken mag je ook een kijkje nemen in het Ai Mobility Experience Center. Daar staat de Iron humanoid met het opengeknipte been.
Nederlands
1
0
1
35
Albert Skibinski
Albert Skibinski@askibinski·
Exactly how I feel sometimes. Context engineering complex systems feels like a dice roll sometimes and takes a lot of effort.
Dan Greenheck@dangreenheck

I've been using Claude Code exclusively for 6 months and I'm still not convinced on this whole AI thing. There are some *seriously* insidious problems that worry me, and I don't see them being fixed any time soon. Every release of a new model, I see hundreds of posts where people think because they one-shotted X or Y, software jobs are cooked (I've probably made one or two of these posts myself). But none of those examples are actually representative of real-world software. If I set it to work on an ambiguous or highly complex problem that has a lot of branching in the solution space, I've noticed the following: - It can often generate a working solution in one-shot, which gives me a false sense of confidence that the AI knows exactly what it's doing. - As I continue to work the problem, I've noticed the AI will start to narrow its focus more and more, not considering how a fix or solution plays into the big picture. - The quality of a solution depends on *how* I prompt it, which is really, really bad. Software engineering should be deterministic, not a dice roll. - It will often ignore instructions I have explicitly stated in the rules file, which removes any confidence I have in the code it generates. - It consistently overstates its confidence in a solution. I literally just got this response from Claude: "I overstated that. Honest answer: it depends on the scene and implementation; the 2–4× figure was too confident." If I had never pushed back, I would have been operating on incorrect information. - It is far too agreeable. If I'm not careful in my wording, the AI will blindly follow my instructions, even if they are suboptimal. I want a real coding partner that challenges my ideas, not an ass-kisser. Don't get me wrong—AI has helped me build some amazing things faster than I ever could without it. But the more I use it, the more I begin to question the direction things are headed. If the AI was more direct about what it (not) capable of, it'd be a lot easier to work with. But being gaslit every step of the way makes the process stressful as hell. Going back to manual coding isn't even an option since the value of having AI *potentially* generating the correct code in 1/10 or 1/100 of the time is literally too good to pass up on. Sorry for the rant, drank way too much cold brew this morning.

English
0
0
0
29
Chubby♨️
Chubby♨️@kimmonismus·
Just landed in China, guangzhou. In two days I’ll flight to Beijing. Super excited!
Chubby♨️ tweet media
English
87
3
728
27.4K
Albert Skibinski retweetledi
Jorge Castillo
Jorge Castillo@JorgeCastilloPr·
Me trying to stop Claude before it rewrites everything again
English
85
457
5.2K
239.4K
Albert Skibinski retweetledi
Felix Lee
Felix Lee@felixleezd·
Claude Code is absolutely incredible but have you tried going outside?
Felix Lee tweet mediaFelix Lee tweet mediaFelix Lee tweet mediaFelix Lee tweet media
English
473
1.5K
18.9K
612.6K
Albert Skibinski
Albert Skibinski@askibinski·
Jalapeno/cheddar zuurdesem
Albert Skibinski tweet media
हिन्दी
0
0
0
20
Albert Skibinski retweetledi
Erik Kuna 🚀
Erik Kuna 🚀@erikkuna·
This is the shot you can’t get from the press site. This camera was sitting a few football fields from the SLS rocket at Pad 39B for days before launch, baking in the Florida sun, surviving rain, humidity, and whatever else the Cape threw at it. No photographer behind the viewfinder. Just a camera, a sound trigger, and a bet. The way pad remotes work: you set your camera up days in advance, dial in your composition, lock everything down, and walk away. You don’t touch it again until after the launch. The shutter fires on sound activation with a @MiopsTrigger smart+ trigger. With SLS, the four RS-25 engines ignite six seconds before the solid rocket boosters, so the camera is already firing before the vehicle even leaves the pad. You get home, pull the card, and find out if you nailed it or if a bird landed on your lens two days ago and left your a present and you got 400 photos of soemthing crappy. There’s no formula for protecting your gear this close. Some photographers build wooden boxes with doors that pop open. Some use plastic bags and tape. Some do plastic or metal barn door rigs on hinges. I tend to leave mine open just in plastic rain covers because boxes limit my composition and setup time, but that means your cameras are more exposed to the elements and whatever energy and debris comes off the pad. You’re basically gambling a camera body every time you set one. That’s what I love about this genre. There’s no playbook. You make it up as you go. Every time is an adventure. 📸 credit: me for @SuperclusterHQ - Artemis II pad remote | ~1,000 ft from Pad 39B | Kennedy Space Center
Erik Kuna 🚀 tweet media
English
752
5.7K
47.6K
1.2M
Albert Skibinski retweetledi
Lucid™
Lucid™@cammakingminds·
If you are using the earth as a reference frame, the moon is actually doing a close flyby of Artemis II.
GIF
English
193
1.8K
16.1K
3.4M
Albert Skibinski
Albert Skibinski@askibinski·
ah blijkbaar is de naam per /buddy verschillend
Albert Skibinski tweet media
Nederlands
0
0
0
13
Albert Skibinski
Albert Skibinski@askibinski·
@djschoone Great idea, I do believe it has some serious hardware requirements though? Nano? I'll look into it
English
1
0
1
25
Daniel Schoone
Daniel Schoone@djschoone·
@askibinski Nice one! Chrome has it's own LLM locally if I'm correct. Did you look into using this instead of Claude?
English
1
0
0
17