inomy

Scrolling the web for hours to find one good product? Skip the 5-hour research rabbit hole. Ask inomy and get unbiased recommendations in minutes.

GM to everyone who opens their phone to do one specific thing, does it, and immediately locks the screen

GM to everyone who enters a fake birthday because a flashlight app doesn’t need to know you’re a Capricorn

GM to the people who use Airplane Mode on the ground, just to protect their peace

@TechCrunch They act like benevolent guardians allowing you to "remove" data, but they require you to verify your identity to do it. So, to protect your privacy, you have to hand over your government ID and current address to the world's largest advertising company. The irony is suffocating.

Google expands tools to let users remove sensitive data about themselves from Search techcrunch.com/2026/02/10/goo…

We are watching the Google timeline on speed. It took Google 15 years to go from organizing the world's information to surveillance ad network. OpenAI did it in 3. The speed of the enshittification suggests that the research lab phase was always just a Trojan Horse for the ad tech phase.

The Facebook comparison actually undersells the risk. Facebook collected behavioral data: clicks, likes, shares, time spent scrolling. That data told advertisers what you did. The FTC fined them $5 billion in 2019 for violating privacy promises they made in 2012, and the core violation was sharing user data with third-party apps after explicitly promising users they could restrict it. ChatGPT collects something categorically different. People type out their fears about their marriages, their medical symptoms, their financial anxieties, their unfinished thoughts. Hitzig calls it "the most detailed record of private human thought ever assembled," and she would know. She literally co-authored OpenAI's own research paper on how people use ChatGPT. And she's not some random engineer who got disillusioned. She's a Harvard PhD economist who specializes in privacy and algorithms, a published poet with two books, and she co-authored a paper with Vitalik Buterin on public goods funding mechanisms. She joined OpenAI specifically to work on the pricing and safety questions that nobody else there had training to answer. Here's the part most people will skip past. OpenAI says ads will be matched to users based on "the topic of your conversation, past chats, and past interactions with ads." Read that again. They're building an ad targeting engine that reads your private conversations to decide which ads to show you. They're already optimizing ChatGPT for daily active users by making the model more sycophantic, which means the engagement flywheel is spinning before the ad revenue even arrives. Facebook's promise erosion took about 7 years from the 2012 FTC order to the $5 billion settlement. OpenAI is speed-running the same arc. They went from "we're a nonprofit research lab" to "we're a capped-profit company" to "we're dropping the cap" to "we're showing you ads" in under three years. Over 90% of ChatGPT's 800 million weekly users are on the Free and Go tiers. The Go plan costs $8/month and still shows ads. So the "choice" OpenAI is offering is: pay $20/month for Plus, or let us read your conversations to sell ad targeting. For a tool that 800 million people use to think out loud, that's the entire ballgame.

This is the ultimate single point of failure. In a decentralized system, if one node goes down, the network survives. In Musk's Everything App, if the X server goes down (or gets blocked), you lose your voice and your wallet simultaneously. You are architecting a fragility engine, not a fortress.

𝕏 Money to launch in 1–2 months in a limited external beta, then worldwide to all 𝕏 users later. Elon Musk: “This is intended to be the place where all the money is. The central source of all monetary transactions. It’s going to be a game-changer.”

@startpage Messages should self-destruct by protocol design, not by user choice. Storing chat history is a liability, not an asset. If the server doesn't have the logs, the subpoena returns 404 Not Found. Design for the breach, not the feature.

Messaging platforms optimize for continuity, not discretion. They are designed to remember.

GM to the ones who know that "Personalized Experience" is corporate speak for "We're watching you.”

GM to everyone who finds the tiny, grey "Unsubscribe" link faster than they read the email subject line

It feels like a breath of fresh air because it’s the only time of year you aren't being treated as a data point. For three hours, you are just a viewer, not "Male, 25-34, High Intent for Pizza, Depressed." It’s the last shared hallucination we have left before we all retreat back into our personalized algorithm cages.

Everyone else is talking about their favorite commercial from yesterday's game. We're just happy to see ads that aren't targeting us with unnerving accuracy.

@session_app The neighborhood pays for the hardware (the cameras) and the electricity, but the intelligence (the AI model) lives on a corporate server. You are crowdsourcing the infrastructure of your own surveillance state. The community doesn't own the feed; the vendor does.

oh good, the vast network of surveillance cameras in your neighborhood is now...connected to AI, so that it can....find lost labradors.

@OpenAI "Protecting trust" while introducing the one business model that historically destroys it. You can’t serve two masters: the user seeking truth and the advertiser seeking conversion. Today it's a visually separate banner; tomorrow it's a subtly optimized recommendation.

We’re starting to roll out a test for ads in ChatGPT today to a subset of free and Go users in the U.S. Ads do not influence ChatGPT’s answers. Ads are labeled as sponsored and visually separate from the response. Our goal is to give everyone access to ChatGPT for free with fewer limits, while protecting the trust they place in it for important and personal tasks. openai.com/index/testing-…

@SecretNetwork Privacy by Default. This is why we need ZK-proofs at the protocol level. If privacy is an opt-in feature, nobody uses it. If privacy is the default, the user remains a sovereign entity rather than a transparent resource to be mined.

If users become content, you built surveillance with extra steps.

@SecurePrivacyAI x.com/askinomy/statu…

"Terms and conditions protect users." Facebook's ToS: 4,200 words. Google's privacy policy: updated 23 times in 2023. Average reading time: 18 minutes per update. Consent isn't informed. It's manufactured exhaustion.

@ETH_Daily @wardenprotocol @useOttoAI @JoAIAgents @minara @Zyfai_ @poapstudio @bankrbot @HeyElsaAI @mamo We are in great company here, but inomy is built on Monad.

Agents @wardenprotocol @useOttoAI @JoAIAgents @askinomy @minara @ZyfAI_ @poapstudio @bankrbot @HeyElsaAI @mamo

Not Solana, but Ethereum is the ideal blockchain for AI. If the thesis is that AI agents will become real economic players—allocating capital, calling APIs, and delivering work products, then the trust layer has to be built on a decentralized, neutral infrastructure, not some centralized system that's prone to crashes and downtime. Ethereum's Strengths - Super decentralized with zero downtime over 10+ years - Worldwide access, censorship resistance, and composability since 2015 - Strong institutional trust and a massive developer ecosystem - As the originator of ERC-8004, Ethereum lays down the ultimate trust foundation for AI agents. 🧵Here's an ERC-8004 map highlighting why Ethereum is the top blockchain for AI:

GM to the people whose "For You" page still hasn't figured out who "You" actually are

GM to the people building a digital life that belongs to them, not a terms of service agreement

GM to the ones who prefer silence over suggested content

we are building an open model to monetize ai-led discovery, which isn't surveillance ads or subscription. ai agents and chatbots have a wealth of your personal data and access to your precious intent. with Intents Protocol, advertisers bid for this intent when users decide to share it with them

@askinomy what is this

Your attention is a scarce asset. Big Tech treats it like free raw material. We treat it like a commodity you own. If an advertiser wants your time, they should have to pay you, not the middleman.

GM to those who know that convenience is often just a fancy word for surveillance