aspavacore

110 posts

aspavacore banner
aspavacore

aspavacore

@aspavacore

shitpost hesabım

Katılım Şubat 2022
4 Takip Edilen1 Takipçiler
aspavacore
aspavacore@aspavacore·
@nativistconcern I don’t clock in to this app to politically aggravate people and pay a monthly fee to elon musk you bootlicker
English
1
0
3
239
nativistconcern
nativistconcern@nativistconcern·
@aspavacore Don't you think you would've accumulated more than one follower in four years on X if your opinion mattered?
English
1
0
3
288
aspavacore
aspavacore@aspavacore·
@nativistconcern Don’t think you are “nativist concern” you seem like a good footsoldier of farage
English
1
0
0
301
aspavacore
aspavacore@aspavacore·
@TheIllegit “a black feminist 911 emergency” no need to read any further
English
0
0
1
56
Duffyevsky ☦
Duffyevsky ☦@TheIllegit·
This is a little bit like when libs (after an initial phase of wild praise) realized 'Anora' wasn't actually a very positive depiction of 'sex work'.
Duffyevsky ☦ tweet media
English
2
0
39
1.8K
aspavacore
aspavacore@aspavacore·
@UtterlyVapid What does “respecting its main character” mean? Your username works wonders to describe you midwit
English
0
0
43
1.3K
aspavacore
aspavacore@aspavacore·
@FerideMercury Just like nobody asker your opinion you failed excuse of a “critic”
English
0
0
1
108
Öykü Sofuoğlu
Öykü Sofuoğlu@FerideMercury·
Thank you Die, My Love’s writer but no one asked your opinion about Berlinale
Öykü Sofuoğlu tweet media
English
1
2
37
3.8K
aspavacore
aspavacore@aspavacore·
@zakfilm She didn’t even say anything remotely political. Are you having a psychosis?
English
0
0
27
1.6K
Zak
Zak@zakfilm·
Charli xcx called films political at the Berlinale. Shame on everyone else who refused to say it
English
29
282
3.5K
434.9K
aspavacore
aspavacore@aspavacore·
@sbodrojan You’re the least qualified person to talk about “good art.” Your job is to post lukewarm ragebait tweets and promote your horrendous substack writing that noone reads. Keep mitski’s name out of your dirty mouth loser.
English
2
3
67
2.5K
aspavacore
aspavacore@aspavacore·
@misterminsoo We don’t care about what you think or “accept” because you’re a dimwit who doesn’t matter at all actually
English
0
0
3
638
Joshua Minsoo Kim
Joshua Minsoo Kim@misterminsoo·
i’m at the acceptance stage now of the pitchfork paywall, this rules. also, the discourse about p4k has been hilarious because you just know the majority of people complaining about eg the rap coverage have myopic, small-minded, r/indieheads taste. one tier above kpop stans.
Pitchfork@pitchfork

Introducing Saturday Tracks: Every Saturday, we’re going deep on one essential song that we haven’t previously reviewed. This week, we begin with Björk’s magical, ineffable, totally disarming debut single pitchfork.com/reviews/tracks…

English
9
11
379
40.2K
aspavacore
aspavacore@aspavacore·
@lonelyfag15 This always-contrarianism has really run its course since the statement is also true and applicable for almost all yuppie straight people
English
0
0
1
100
aspavacore
aspavacore@aspavacore·
@tweeasfuck You are a terrible writer, probably contributed nothing at all to culture through your years at this failing institution and hope you get sacked
English
0
0
2
107
anna gaca
anna gaca@tweeasfuck·
it’s about to be the best year ever for pitchfork reviews. four albums a day like old times and our commenters are chill and way nicer than people on social media. can’t wait for you to see what we’ve got this weekend—hope you’ll subscribe and hang out
coleman spilde@colemanjspilde

if you complain about being asked to pay $5 a month for the most insightful, wide-ranging, edifying music coverage being published online—a tiny fee for such a treat—you’re legally required to let me go through your bank charges and to see what stupid shit you’re buying instead

English
12
4
143
23.2K
aspavacore
aspavacore@aspavacore·
@mirandareinert I noticed this historical revisionism as well lol. Where is the first pic/rubric from please?
English
1
0
0
433
miranda
miranda@mirandareinert·
well it used to be harsher in the mid-field but “terrible and symptomatic of some kind of larger problem in music or the world” is maybe even funnier than “breaks new ground for terrible” pitchfork.com/info/scoring-g…
miranda tweet mediamiranda tweet mediamiranda tweet media
English
4
7
169
11.6K
aspavacore
aspavacore@aspavacore·
@jeremydlarson Keep sucking conde nast’s dick jeremy, they’re about to cum
English
1
0
2
404
Jeremy D. Larson
Jeremy D. Larson@jeremydlarson·
I think the music criticism we publish is exceptional and worth paying for. I think music as an art form is inherently personal & lends itself to communal engagement and individual authority, which can live side by side. And though Pitchfork means a lot to me, it's only a website
Pitchfork@pitchfork

For the first time in 30 years, we’re launching a digital subscription. Read every Pitchfork review, rate and review albums yourself, and take part in artist and editor Q&As, all for $5 a month More info: pitchfork.visitlink.me/Yu9p5m

English
45
16
506
103K
aspavacore
aspavacore@aspavacore·
@annakhachiyan So sad that you allowed willingly to have your great brain corroded by twitter but “many such cases” unfortunately
English
0
0
2
43