Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Arash 🇮🇷🇨🇦
169 posts

Arash 🇮🇷🇨🇦
@atomic_Psyche
CS Engineer 💻 «زهی خیال باطل» «کار را که کرد؟ آنکه تمام کرد»
United Colonies Katılım Mayıs 2026
69 Takip Edilen12 Takipçiler

@beit_Hmikdash آقا یکی از دوستان یه کانفیگ دور زدن فیلترینگ درست کرد، یه روز نشد فیلتر شد. 🤯
فارسی

پلیس ارتش برزیل جان یه بچه را نجات داد.
𝐈𝐧𝐞𝐬𝐃𝐞𝐥𝐀𝐥𝐦𝐚𝐌𝐢𝐚@InesBetancur1
BRASIL 🇧🇷|| Policías militares salvan a bebé de ocho días de nacido, tras asfixiarse en Maracajá. Un vecino condujo a la familia en un Fiat Palio blanco hasta la patrulla Estaban allí en el día, hora y lugar correcto, alabado sea Dios 🙏🏻
فارسی

@just_vianney @mb_ghalibaf Repeating "ratification" doesn't change the fact that transit rights are customary international law binding on every nation regardless of a treaty signature—go learn the difference between a document and a universal norm.
English

@atomic_Psyche @mb_ghalibaf You're talking about a treaty that said itself that
“THIS TREATY IS SUBJECT TO RATIFICATION”
😂😂😂
Which ever way you want to put it. Iran isn't bound by that Treaty because they didn't ratify it.
So they're not breaking a single law.
English

@Ahmedz313 @TehranTimes79 Imagine being so lost in an argument that you have to resort to Holocaust denial to feel like you’re winning. We’re done here.
English

@atomic_Psyche @TehranTimes79 Why you don't like the imaginary figure of 6 million 😂. Your entire settler colonial state was built on that figure
English
Arash 🇮🇷🇨🇦 retweetledi

@Sandisodoleh بتمنهای قبل از تو سوءتفاهم بودند. روح پدرت در آرامش باد ❤️🩹
فارسی

Nice try with the VCLT, but go back to Law 101 and read Article 18; signatories can't undermine a treaty's purpose.
You're ignoring Customary International Law, which makes transit rights binding on everyone regardless of ratification.
Stop using paperwork loopholes to justify blocking a global chokepoint that the entire world economy relies on.
English

@atomic_Psyche @mb_ghalibaf At least type with your brain and stop using AI.
Meanwhile, Article 14 of the 1969 VCLT states that a country can only be bound by signature if the treaty it is signing says so.
While Article 306 of the UNCLOS explicitly says the treaty is subject to ratification by the State
English

@mjrs__97 پلیس خادم مردم است و هیچوقت بیدفاع نیست. اگر کسی به او حمله کند، شاید از لحاظ روانی تحت فشار بوده باشد. در شرایط دیماه کاملاً حرکت طبیعی به نظر میآید، حتی اگر اسناد معتبر باشد.
فارسی

@atomic_Psyche چرا نمیگی عباسی و دخترش جون یه پلیس بی دفاع رو با ۲۸ ضربه چاقو گرفتن؟
فارسی

Actually, focusing solely on ratification is a massive oversimplification of how the world works. While Iran hasn’t ratified UNCLOS, the vast majority of its provisions—especially those on freedom of navigation and transit passage—are recognized as customary international law. These rules bind all states regardless of ratification because they reflect established global practice. If nations could simply opt out of maritime law by not ratifying, the global economy would have been in chaos for decades.
It’s frustrating to see you ignore that Iran has signed the treaty, which under the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties already obligates it not to undermine the treaty’s core purpose. You’re using a legal loophole to justify blocking a strategic chokepoint, but international law doesn’t allow states to pick and choose which parts of the ocean they own based on a technicality. Stop hiding behind semantics and recognize that customary law governs the Strait of Hormuz for a reason.
English

@atomic_Psyche @mb_ghalibaf Maybe you're the one who needs to do more reading. Because if you did, you would know that Iran never ratified it.
So Iran is not bound by that Treaty.
Signing and ratifying a treaty are two different things.
And you need to do both to be bound by that treaty.
English
Arash 🇮🇷🇨🇦 retweetledi

The math is correct, but the legal conclusion isn't. Under UNCLOS Part III, international straits are governed by the right of "Transit Passage." Even if the waters are territorial, coastal states cannot legally block or suspend international navigation. Strategic chokepoints like Hormuz are treated as global corridors precisely to prevent trade from being held hostage by geography. You've got to read more books.
English

@atomic_Psyche @mb_ghalibaf I hope you realise the Strait is 24 miles.
If Oman takes out 12 and Iran takes out 12 what's left in the strait?
So yeah every ship that pass to hormuz all enter Iran's EEZ
English

@just_vianney @mb_ghalibaf UNCLOS (the 'UN book') confirms that everything beyond 12 miles is open for business. Calling an EEZ your 'backyard' is like claiming you own the sidewalk because you can see it from your window. Global trade doesn't stop just because someone forgot to read Article 58.
English

@atomic_Psyche @mb_ghalibaf That is not International water. Maybe do some reading. No where in the world of in UN book is that place said to be International water.
English
















