Away

KUFR OF SALAR 🧵 This thread will explore the KUFR of this mentally ill person who is raised by scummy parents I think. Part I: Lies about Islam. Intentionally lies about Islam to ‘ragebait’ Indians.

@GoalsRanting When a woman observes the five times of prayer, fasts during Ramadan, preserves her chastity and obeys her husband, she may enter by any of the gates of paradise she wishes.

@avyzan "The best among you are those who are best to their wives" if your muslim read the hadiths get knowledge

Hate that this kind of thing is coming from women rape is haram so do martial rape!

@billuubadmaash @koshur188068 bruh, leave it.

@avyzan @koshur188068 Haan toh sex bhi toh 😭 pouch kr krenge aise thodi aaja let jaa wtf cannot teach you basic decency

Gawd there is no concept khadijaa zuwa mera machine hai insaan nhi

@GoalsRanting marriage is for sex primarily. yes love/compassion exists. however, the basis of the contract is on sex. personally, i don't even care about forcing. i would rather not be with such a woman who refuses sex.

@avyzan So you're getting married for just sex not for companions not for love and if your wife said no you will force her??!

@billuubadmaash @koshur188068 al 'izziyah.

@avyzan @koshur188068 Aww its ok defend it

wahhabis gone woke.

@toomuchcocaine5 @batman_faraway @_Caged_ are you saying you are gay or impotent? which one is it?

@avyzan @batman_faraway @_Caged_ "A man gets married for sex" Talk for yourself indian

Islam doesn't allow Marital R@pe. Quran 4:19 : "Live with them in kindness" Quran 2:187: "They are garments for you and you are garments for them" Quran 2:231: "Do not harm them so as to oppress them" The Prophet ﷺ said: "The best of you are those who are best to their wives."

@toomuchcocaine5 @batman_faraway @_Caged_ let's see. marriage happens because a guy wants to have sex. women can prevent a man from having sex as long as there is a valid excuse. if a woman has no excuse, and denies sex then there is no point for a man to get married. since, he gets nothing out of marriage.

@avyzan @batman_faraway @_Caged_ Does sex mean jab dil kare kutton ki tarha biwi pe charh jao? Sex means consensual intercourse between 2 partners. And r*pe means one sided forceful sex. Being married doesn't mean you can force yourself on your spouse.

@j0icat im the biomass who doesn't compromise on principles of the religion to sound edgy on the internet, so idk.

What's SAIF?

@koshur188068 @billuubadmaash nikah means sex. marriage is basically a sex contract, so the idea of martial rape is nonsensical.

@billuubadmaash Shukriya

@toomuchcocaine5 @batman_faraway @_Caged_ nikah literally means sex. It's an arabic word. please stop, it's embarrassing.

@avyzan @batman_faraway @_Caged_ Marriage is a companionship not just about sex you tarse huay ghaleez indian. You indians are by nature animals. Dont associate your mentality to islam. And islam tells you to be respectful towards your spouse. You're a human, not an animal. But again, ur indian

join saif.systems to become a heretic!!!

@paleohanafi @deendreams001 can i dm?

@deendreams001 we’re gonna pick you sister don’t worry

there is no such thing as “marital rape” in Islam. This idea is propaganda. Marriage and rape are fundamentally contradictory and cannot be equated..

@sufferingpct @sauroness live with the kuffar, become like the kuffar. story of every gay man.

@sauroness some of the muslims on this app piss me the fuck off

the fact that there are men telling her in comments that she's wrong and educating her on consent is embarrassing. likee tried so hard to be a pick me bitch but no one's picking her up

@esrawberry like @Adam1_2_ i know

a pretty face doesn't guarantee decency. people may look attractive but still come across as cringeworthy, regardless of their gender. some lack basic human ethics, don’t know how to communicate properly & end up sounding cheap which is v annoying. little class goes a long way 🤍

@toomuchcocaine5 @batman_faraway @_Caged_ no, nikah = sex. marriage is literally a sex contract. so martial rape makes zero sense.

@batman_faraway @_Caged_ Just because the exact term "marital r*pe" doesnt exist in quran or hadith doesn't mean they dont exist in islam. In islam, marital r*pe is a huge sin

@quirkyophelia this is only problematic if someone is a prude.

A great writer once said: Men read basic decency as sexual intent, because they themselves wouldn't offer kindness to a woman unless they were hoping to get into her pants.

anyone who says child marriage is disgusting has left islam, and upon him is the curse of allāh

I'm unsure why everyone is not only repeating an obviously inauthentic hadith by both Western and traditional scholars. The misinformation being spammed is baffling. Also known as "al-Zutt". (1) The hadith itself is genuinely weak, according to traditional Muslim scholars. (2) Even if it says 'sahih', the hadith itself has nothing sexual about it. The verb used is also used in Q72:19 without any implication of sexual activity (from @Rurouni_Phoenix). The verb is probably closer to "clinging onto", similar to when Jacob wrestled with God (Gen 33:22-32). The verb itself in some versions of the story actually mean "followed him" like Al Buhayqi it says "فازدحموا عليه". 𝐲𝐚𝐫𝐤𝐚𝐛𝐮̄𝐧𝐚 simply has no sexual meaning to it. (3) Nobody, not even before the year 2000 likely viewed this hadith in any sexual connotation. John of Damascus, nor any opponents used this hadith as a criticism of Muhammad, or Islam for that matter. If the hadith originally had a sexual connotation to it, then we would likely see some form of polemics attached to this hadith, but we don't. The idea of 'al-Zutt' being a sexual scandal is a 21st century fictional product. (4) Several verses, both in hadith & the Qur'an explicitly punish sodomy. That automatically makes any sexual interpretation of the story to be illogical. Virtually all tafsirs, and all Muslim scholars prohibited sodomy. What differed was what the punishment would be (burning, crucifixion, etc, see: Tafsīr al-Qurṭubī: 7/243 or Tanbīh al-Ghāfilīn, p. 142). (5) If this story had a sexual meaning to it, then we would see Muslims attempt to hide it or distort it. But no Muslim ever viewed it as embarrassing or attempted to hide it, probably because it was never meant to be sexual to begin with. (6) There's no evidence of (a) Arabs knowing the concept of 'Sindh' people(s), (b) or any evidence of people from the Sindh region inhabiting the Hijaz region, or (c) any motive for Sindh people(s) to even come to the Hijaz region to begin with by 630 C.E. It all, clearly makes no sense. (7) The idea of "al-Zutt" or Sindh people(s) arriving to hadith probably come just a decade after Muhammad's death, where the Rashidun caliphate attacked the Rai dynasty of Sindh in present day Pakistan. (8) The original story isn't meant to be about any actual people(s) but about Jinn. Q72:1-19 and Q46:29-32 have the story about a group of jinn listening to Muhammad recite the Qur'an. Virtually most hadith except a couple all agree that it was about 'Jinn', not some people from Sindh.