Azydkh

Senegal are likely to argue that they did not abandon the game, the match was completed by the referee’s whistle. They can say Article 82 was misapplied because the game continued under the same circumstances and reached its natural end. The referee allowing Senegal back on the pitch and Morocco happily continuing the game will be used to state the match - and result - was valid. As the final was completed, they can argue the integrity of the game was upheld. They can also claim changing the winner of a completed final is an extreme overreach by the Appeal Board. And that the punishment for a delay - not a refusal to play as they finished the game - is excessive.

Although AFCON rules state walking off or refusing to play for a prolonged period is grounds for elimination, the decision to strip Senegal of the AFCON title two months after their trophy lift is a bad look for CAF. It should be within the power of the officials in real time to disqualify a team, but it's a hollow victory for Morocco to appeal and win in this manner, weeks after the trophy lift. Morocco accepted Senegal's return from their 10-minute walk off, gladly resumed play and took their penalty. Missing it, losing the game, then appealing to gain the trophy doesn't sit right, even if by the letter of the law there are grounds to do so.

سعر النفط sahara blend الجزائري يصل ل 80 دولار بعد هذا القصف.

WOW JUST WOW! UTTER DOMINANCE!

خطيررررررررر جداً جداً 🔥🔥🔥 الشرق الأوسط سوف يشتغل 🔥 تحث وزارة الخارجية الأمريكية الأمريكيين على المغادرة الآن عبر وسائل تجارية بسبب مخاطر أمنية خطيرة من الدول التأليه : البحرين مصر إيران العراق إسرائيل والضفة الغربية وغزة الأردن الكويت لبنان عمان قطر المملكة العربية السعودية سوريا الإمارات العربية المتحدة اليمن

عاجل .. إصابة مصفاة أرامكو راس تنورة بطائرة إيرانية بدون طيار حفظ الله المملكة قيادةً وشعباً 🇸🇦