Mi Ba

4.1K posts

Mi Ba banner
Mi Ba

Mi Ba

@banalityofevl

Katılım Temmuz 2025
161 Takip Edilen66 Takipçiler
Candace Owens
Candace Owens@RealCandaceO·
They put this article behind a paywall because its contents are so absurd that even the journalists are too embarrassed to perpetuate it. Here is what it says: "Video of the Aspen donor conference has never been released publicly. But the Daily Mail has been given exclusive access to screen the full video, report on its contents and speak to individuals who were in the room in Aspen that day, as secrecy around the footage has become a major point of contention for critics of Turning Point and its new CEO, Erika Kirk." Yep, you read that right. They did a special screening JUST for Daily Mail writers and they are reporting that the video is like, totally legit! So why won't Turning Point USA just release it? Don't worry, I'll save you time. The first reason is because, well..does it even really matter if the video exists? "Several Turning Point allies feel that too much attention has been focused on the video from Aspen and said it was always clear to them that Charlie had intended for Erika to lead the organization in his absence. One board member, who wished to remain anonymous, confirmed to the Daily Mail he was personally involved with personal, financial and estate planning with the couple after they were married. During those discussions, they made it clear that if anything should happen to Kirk, his wife would be responsible for the organization that he had founded. 'Erika knows more about Charlie's feelings and emotions and where he wanted to bring Turning Point than anybody else out there,' the board member said. 'The board already knew what the plan was because they talked about it with Charlie, everybody knew.' Friends of Charlie Kirk also told the Daily Mail that he frequently spoke of his wife taking over the organization in his absence." And the second reason they won't release it? Because apparently Turning Point no longer remembers how to black out a body in editing. Or mute its voice. They want to protect the person asking the question: "While the public release of the video would prove Owen's suggestions of a fraud to be false, some in the organization believe good-faith efforts would be rejected and the video would be weaponized. On top of those concerns, the donor who asked the 'succession' question does not want her question and identity revealed to the public, sources within the organization told the Daily Mail." Yes, Turning Point USA now wants you to trust the experts! They continue to have ZERO respect for the public.
Daily Mail US@Daily_MailUS

Bombshell secret video of Charlie Kirk naming his true Turning Point successor days before assassination trib.al/L3uvxtz

English
983
1.2K
9.1K
1.6M
Mi Ba
Mi Ba@banalityofevl·
@PoliticsOnX @RealCandaceO Omg who still calls themselves MAGA and isn't 90 years old 😂 trump is this you?; there no way fox news grandpas can find x. Only other option is mossad bot. They loooooove calling themselves MAGA. Where's the fake American flag in the pic, baby killer?
English
1
0
1
40
Politics On 𝕏
Politics On 𝕏@PoliticsOnX·
@RealCandaceO CANDACE: "They put this article behind a paywall because its contents are so absurd that even the journalists are too embarrassed to perpetuate it." x.com/RealCandaceO/s… ALSO CANDACE: 🫵🤡
Politics On 𝕏 tweet mediaPolitics On 𝕏 tweet media
Candace Owens@RealCandaceO

They put this article behind a paywall because its contents are so absurd that even the journalists are too embarrassed to perpetuate it. Here is what it says: "Video of the Aspen donor conference has never been released publicly. But the Daily Mail has been given exclusive access to screen the full video, report on its contents and speak to individuals who were in the room in Aspen that day, as secrecy around the footage has become a major point of contention for critics of Turning Point and its new CEO, Erika Kirk." Yep, you read that right. They did a special screening JUST for Daily Mail writers and they are reporting that the video is like, totally legit! So why won't Turning Point USA just release it? Don't worry, I'll save you time. The first reason is because, well..does it even really matter if the video exists? "Several Turning Point allies feel that too much attention has been focused on the video from Aspen and said it was always clear to them that Charlie had intended for Erika to lead the organization in his absence. One board member, who wished to remain anonymous, confirmed to the Daily Mail he was personally involved with personal, financial and estate planning with the couple after they were married. During those discussions, they made it clear that if anything should happen to Kirk, his wife would be responsible for the organization that he had founded. 'Erika knows more about Charlie's feelings and emotions and where he wanted to bring Turning Point than anybody else out there,' the board member said. 'The board already knew what the plan was because they talked about it with Charlie, everybody knew.' Friends of Charlie Kirk also told the Daily Mail that he frequently spoke of his wife taking over the organization in his absence." And the second reason they won't release it? Because apparently Turning Point no longer remembers how to black out a body in editing. Or mute its voice. They want to protect the person asking the question: "While the public release of the video would prove Owen's suggestions of a fraud to be false, some in the organization believe good-faith efforts would be rejected and the video would be weaponized. On top of those concerns, the donor who asked the 'succession' question does not want her question and identity revealed to the public, sources within the organization told the Daily Mail." Yes, Turning Point USA now wants you to trust the experts! They continue to have ZERO respect for the public.

English
7
7
56
2.1K
Mi Ba
Mi Ba@banalityofevl·
@Alex_Major1 @PoliticsOnX @RealCandaceO Zionist freaks are at it again. Charlie with no legal right named Erika in all his "estate planning" to take the company he did not own lol given to us by the know propaganda outfit daily Mail that has lied in 85 percent of articles. Also stop killing kids zios
English
0
0
0
6
Mi Ba
Mi Ba@banalityofevl·
@PoliticsOnX @ChristinaR7xd9 @RealCandaceO @NickJFuentes None of this has anything to do with what is true and we know this article is fake. Charlie didn't own the company and had zero legal right in any "estate" planning to name Erika lol the daily Mail also told us Epstein was kgb. The daily Mail is a zionist outfit
English
0
0
0
9
Mi Ba retweetledi
Phantom Pain
Phantom Pain@phantompain1984·
What “experts,” @RealCandaceO ? Erika Kirk releasing the succession video through the Daily Mail should make everyone pause. Daily Mail sits inside Murdoch’s pro-Isræl propaganda universe. They even ran the ridiculous Epstein was KGB. 😂 So when Erika’s narrative moves through that machine, I do not see “expert confirmation.” I see damage control. Full investigation on Erika Kirk, Likud, Rothschild, and the Epstein circle: (phantompain1984.substack.com/p/erika-kirk-a…) The deception is not only what Erika says. It is who gets chosen to sanctify the story.
Phantom Pain tweet mediaPhantom Pain tweet media
Candace Owens@RealCandaceO

They put this article behind a paywall because its contents are so absurd that even the journalists are too embarrassed to perpetuate it. Here is what it says: "Video of the Aspen donor conference has never been released publicly. But the Daily Mail has been given exclusive access to screen the full video, report on its contents and speak to individuals who were in the room in Aspen that day, as secrecy around the footage has become a major point of contention for critics of Turning Point and its new CEO, Erika Kirk." Yep, you read that right. They did a special screening JUST for Daily Mail writers and they are reporting that the video is like, totally legit! So why won't Turning Point USA just release it? Don't worry, I'll save you time. The first reason is because, well..does it even really matter if the video exists? "Several Turning Point allies feel that too much attention has been focused on the video from Aspen and said it was always clear to them that Charlie had intended for Erika to lead the organization in his absence. One board member, who wished to remain anonymous, confirmed to the Daily Mail he was personally involved with personal, financial and estate planning with the couple after they were married. During those discussions, they made it clear that if anything should happen to Kirk, his wife would be responsible for the organization that he had founded. 'Erika knows more about Charlie's feelings and emotions and where he wanted to bring Turning Point than anybody else out there,' the board member said. 'The board already knew what the plan was because they talked about it with Charlie, everybody knew.' Friends of Charlie Kirk also told the Daily Mail that he frequently spoke of his wife taking over the organization in his absence." And the second reason they won't release it? Because apparently Turning Point no longer remembers how to black out a body in editing. Or mute its voice. They want to protect the person asking the question: "While the public release of the video would prove Owen's suggestions of a fraud to be false, some in the organization believe good-faith efforts would be rejected and the video would be weaponized. On top of those concerns, the donor who asked the 'succession' question does not want her question and identity revealed to the public, sources within the organization told the Daily Mail." Yes, Turning Point USA now wants you to trust the experts! They continue to have ZERO respect for the public.

English
10
28
168
6.3K
Mi Ba retweetledi
The Babylon Bibi
The Babylon Bibi@TheBabylonBibi·
@RealCandaceO "to screen the full video, report on its contents and speak to individuals who were in the room in Aspen that day" Why would they need to speak to individuals who were in the room that day? Shouldn't the video just speak for itself? Such drama kings
English
6
17
510
6.1K
Mi Ba
Mi Ba@banalityofevl·
@RealCandaceO State planning? There's your clue. Charlie didn't "own" the company. The board of directors had the legal right to appoint someone. Not Charlie and Erika in any "estate" planning. They think we are dumb
English
0
0
0
14
Mi Ba retweetledi
The Babylon Bibi
The Babylon Bibi@TheBabylonBibi·
So random!
The Babylon Bibi tweet media
English
36
386
4K
32.5K
Mi Ba retweetledi
The Babylon Bibi
The Babylon Bibi@TheBabylonBibi·
Congressmen (And Their AIPAC Guys) Brainstorm How To Oppose The AIPAC Act Without Raising Any Red Flags
The Babylon Bibi tweet media
English
10
89
585
6.1K
Mi Ba retweetledi
The Babylon Bibi
The Babylon Bibi@TheBabylonBibi·
If Israel can sue American newspapers, maybe American newspapers can sue Israel?
The Babylon Bibi tweet media
English
9
92
942
7.5K
Mi Ba retweetledi
Candace Owens
Candace Owens@RealCandaceO·
We named everyone copied on the email in today’s episode. I would say “reporters do your job” but I appreciate that it seems you’re implicated in this one: youtube.com/live/Pb7UlpRdW…
YouTube video
YouTube
English
92
268
2.2K
157.5K
Mi Ba retweetledi
Mi Ba retweetledi
Candace Owens
Candace Owens@RealCandaceO·
Seems my interview with @imelizabethlane is going viral and has deeply upset the right people because of what I revealed about Charlie. Full force tonight reminding people “okay but what about that time mispronounced words on her live podcast!” LOL. WATCH: youtu.be/6Wp3k8dmlhk?si…
YouTube video
YouTube
Jersey Gem ♊️@GeminifromJerz

About halfway through and I’m GLUED! shout out to @imelizabethlane - such good questions 👏 I’ve been a @RealCandaceO #Standace for years and feel like I know everything about her. But this interview style goes so much deeper ! Love you guys! 💚💚💚

English
328
489
5K
372.4K
Mi Ba
Mi Ba@banalityofevl·
@JoelWBerry Pretending ISREAL is America is not working and never going to work ok there mossad
English
0
0
0
0
Mi Ba retweetledi
Candace Owens
Candace Owens@RealCandaceO·
Yes, we all understand “what’s going on here”, champ. The Left and Right apparently agree that genocide is always wrong. Also, no matter how much money or influence you peddle, it is generally ill-advisable to launch a war against “Christ is King” and think you’re going to win thanks to a cackle of middle-aged Babylon Bee dudes authoring X essays about it online. What’s “going on here” is a free market response to unbearable arrogance. Ben Shapiro is the story of Macbeth. A man who desperately wanted to be King and ruthlessly harmed others to become one. He then ruled according to the paranoid delusions stemming from his own guilty conscience—believing others were capable of similarly plotting against him. He surrounded himself with various Lady Macbeths (yourself among them) convincing him the shadows on the wall were real and that he needed to attack everyone from Megyn Kelly to Theo Von. He has been in a state of psychological decay for years now and he has people like you to thank for being bested by his hallucinations.
Joel Berry@JoelWBerry

The America-hating Left is not attacking Tucker, Megyn, Fuentes, or Candace. They’re attacking Ben. Understand what’s going on here.

English
707
1.2K
9.9K
405.1K