Jonathon Halliwell

3.9K posts

Jonathon Halliwell banner
Jonathon Halliwell

Jonathon Halliwell

@bantros

Disinformation Expert

Here Katılım Ocak 2009
672 Takip Edilen272 Takipçiler
Yeerk.P 🦆
Yeerk.P 🦆@PYeerk·
The people responsible for what you so smugly call "the European bottle cap" (as if this is some noble piece of cultural heritage) ought to be arrested and hanged- they are clearly insane misanthropes who need to be put out of their- and our- misery before they think of something else to inflict on us
English
3
0
66
1.3K
Benjamin Treeline
Benjamin Treeline@Treelinius·
@bantros @cjsnowdon Because he has been. And he isn't wrong. You cannot keep enriching the wealthy at the expense of everyone and everything else in society & expect that society to function.
English
2
0
0
38
Christopher Snowdon
Christopher Snowdon@cjsnowdon·
Some have questioned his business acumen but Gary Stevenson makes at least £127,260 a year from complaining about inequality on his Patreon. 👌
Christopher Snowdon tweet media
English
163
198
3.3K
326.1K
Jonathon Halliwell
Jonathon Halliwell@bantros·
@Sargon_of_Akkad That's democracy in a nutshell and it's already hurting people. Not that I agree with this policy but what do you think they are going to do to you and anyone right of centre if the Greens gain power, or Starmer gets replaced with a progressive lunatic?
English
0
0
0
121
Jonathon Halliwell
Jonathon Halliwell@bantros·
@nocontextEFC What do you think happens to the price of a pint if the Green Party gets in and increases the minimum wage to £15/ph
English
0
0
0
13
Jonathon Halliwell
Jonathon Halliwell@bantros·
@Sargon_of_Akkad How is it "punishment" if they voted for the Green Party with their open border policies and everything that entails?
English
0
0
3
25
Carl Benjamin 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿
It should really go without saying that punitive partisan policies that target sections of the electorate for voting in the "wrong" way is distinctly un-British and, frankly, shameful. Threatening sections of the electorate with punishment, in the form of placing dangerous migrant camps in their midst, might seem like a clever strategy on the surface, but it attacks something foundational concealed beneath our politics and is deeply unwise. We are a nation and, as Edmund Burke argued, have shared national interests that go beyond our provincial concerns. These interests go beyond the mere material. The unspoken assumption of Britain is that, despite any political divides, we are British and therefore will treat one another in a manner that recognises the fundamental legitimacy of the other person and their claim to a decent life. Regardless of disputes, they ought to be able to go about their day comfortably and safe in the knowledge that this is their country and they belong to it. This is the psychic fabric that itself has been damaged by mass immigration: bringing in millions of people from countries who do not have this special attitude is what brings about the intangible feeling of unease that causes "white flight". It's why the country feels less safe, whether or not it actually is, and why people wish to live among people like themselves. The world becomes predictable and you can feel at your ease that tomorrow will be like today, and today will be like yesterday. Carving up areas of the country into ideological chunks that can be dealt a cruel hand because of their voting record is the hard edge of politics that we really must avoid. Ideology turns countrymen into enemies, brother against brother, over ephermeral abstractions that have devastating and permanent consequences. The ideological politics of the Blair era is what brought these problems to our doors in the first place. It was understood by them that "rubbing the right's nose in diversity" was a punishment, to be weaponised against their enemies. The logical conclusion of this was Zack Polanski's building a society without the right entirely. The Green-voting areas targeted by Reform are well-to-do white areas of the country, who have not yet had to live with the consequences of their politics. This is the axel around which the emotional impact of the policy hinges, and reveals the horror of what Reform plan to do. Yes, they're stupid, but they are going to be like babes in the woods in the face of it. Reform have taken up the destructive politics of ideology from the other direction, and if we look at what it has brought into existence without the mystifying lens of political ideology, it seems monstrous. In concrete terms, what we are seeing is a Muslim man who is threatening British men, women, and children with the rapes and murders caused by unvetted illegals co-religionists in order to gain political power. Why should we think he would stop there? Such behaviour ought not to be rewarded. This kind of ideological politics is completely alien to British life, and very foreign way of approaching the political dispensation of the country. It is a direct attack on the psychic fabric of the nation and renders us into two opposed and irreconcilable camps, where the human feeling that bound us together is severed. It also solidifies the control that ideology has over both sides: once one is attacked by the other, the victim will feel obliged to respond in kind. We must rise above this kind of politics before it destroys the precious metaphysical inheritence of the nation and forever drags us down into a place from which we cannot escape.
English
286
111
910
56.6K
Smooch
Smooch@Isa_Smooch·
@Mr_Andrew_Fox Haha, you lot are insane. Oh no, young women want an end to massive wealth disparity, oppose genocide and care about the environment! Monsters.
English
42
2
123
3.3K
Andrew Fox
Andrew Fox@Mr_Andrew_Fox·
Whilst everyone was focusing on the manosphere and watching Adolescence, nobody has considered the radicalisation of young women, which appears numerically to be a far greater problem.
Andrew Fox tweet media
English
330
808
7K
299K
Mark Washio
Mark Washio@ouroborus73·
@PeterMcCormack And yet he correctly identified how Covid money printing was a major cause of the asset price inflation we have seen since..
English
15
0
3
1.1K
Peter McCormack 🏴‍☠️🇬🇧🇮🇪
Incentives matter. Gary admitted on Pier’s Morgan that he made around £2m as a trader. This may seem like a lot of money, but it’s not retirement money on the lifestyle he will maintain. Gary needs to sell books and awareness. He’s spotted a vulnerability with a particular group so he sells emotional based economics. It isn’t actually economics, it’s whinging and victim culture. His answers come down to socialism, but socialism harms the people he claims to want to help. Gary is wrong. Don’t be a Gary.
Proper Memes 〓〓@Proper_Memes

Gary doesn't even understand the basics of taxation, like income tax vs inheritance tax or corporate tax vs consumption tax.

English
277
464
5.7K
304.8K
ᥫ𝒎𝒆𝒍᭡
ᥫ𝒎𝒆𝒍᭡@motsdemaelys·
honestly i'm this close to quitting reading for good. every single author i actually love turns out to be problematic or worse. i'm so tired of finding out after i already got attached. feels like i can't enjoy anything anymore without a background check first
English
1.1K
96
2.9K
9.2M
Jonathon Halliwell
Jonathon Halliwell@bantros·
@SirSimonClarke @ActualJC Given the Green Party advocates for "open borders" and their voter base is typically in favour of such policies, why would you consider it a "punishment"?
English
0
0
1
49
Simon Clarke
Simon Clarke@SirSimonClarke·
@ActualJC No. Read my tweet. I am saying that using their placement as an act of politicised collective punishment is illogical and very likely illegal. So nobody will be detained and millions will be wasted in court.
English
124
0
45
30K
Simon Clarke
Simon Clarke@SirSimonClarke·
We need to stop illegal immigration, but this is abhorrent from Reform. Zia is proposing the siting of detention centres expressly as a form of political punishment for people and places that don’t vote Reform - not just Green, but presumably Conservative, Liberal and Labour too. (And what about Reform voters in those constituencies?) It would almost certainly be deemed an abuse of ministerial power for political purposes, and as such would likely be stuck down in court before ever being implemented, wasting millions for the taxpayer without detaining anyone. If it were to go ahead, it would still represent an appalling waste of public money as these sites might well not be in any way suitable for the proposed centres, or near the other infrastructure required. What’s worse is that he is doing all this to provoke outrage and draw attention to Reform a few days out from the local elections. Reform know what they are doing. But this goes beyond a pre-election stunt. It’s declared as a major policy commitment, and should be treated as such. We need a proper plan to leave the ECHR and restore safe border controls, not gimmicks that wouldn’t survive first contact with reality.
Zia Yusuf@ZiaYusufUK

Today we announce a new policy: In order to deport all illegal migrants in Britain, Reform will need to detain tens of thousands at a time. Migrants will not be able to leave these detention centres, and each will be held there a couple of weeks before being deported. So here’s our promise: A Reform government will not put any migrant detention facilities in any constituency with a Reform MP. Nor will we put them where Reform controls the council. And of the remaining areas, we will prioritise Green controlled parliamentary constituencies and Green controlled councils to locate the detention centres. Put simply, if you vote in a Reform council or Reform MP, we guarantee you won’t have a detention centre near you. If you vote Green, there’s a good chance you will. This is an important exercise in democratic consent, not just for our mass deportation policy, but for where the detention centres are placed. Given @ZackPolanski openly advocates for open borders, I look forward to their warm embrace of this policy. votegreengetillegals.com

English
1.3K
128
711
389K
Jonathon Halliwell
Jonathon Halliwell@bantros·
@GuineaPiginUK 600k is the amount of people claiming more benefits than the average person earns after tax, not the total amount of people on benefits
English
0
0
3
298
Guinea Pig
Guinea Pig@GuineaPiginUK·
@NeilDotObrien UK Population is roughly 69 million people so 600,000 is a drop in the Ocean or very, very small amount of individuals.
English
5
0
3
2.7K
Neil O'Brien
Neil O'Brien@NeilDotObrien·
Today's Telegraph reports on some of my research about the growth of really large welfare claims - with over 600k households now getting more in benefits than the average person takes home after tax. Quick thread: (1/10)
Neil O'Brien tweet media
English
88
493
1.7K
138K
Peter McCormack 🏴‍☠️🇬🇧🇮🇪
Inflation is a tax on the poor and a subsidy to the rich. A party which refuses to deal with inflation, hates the poor and loves the rich. Guess what happens in every socialist state - high inflation. Socialists hate the poor.
unusual_whales@unusual_whales

Inflation is “the most regressive tax that anyone in Washington could come up with,” Kevin Warsh has said. “If you were trying to do the most harm to the least well off among us, inflation would be the way to do it."

English
28
57
374
14K
Jonathon Halliwell
Jonathon Halliwell@bantros·
@kkolozova Wrong. The more wealthy and gender equal a country the larger the gender gap in people's preferences as they choose according to want rather than need
English
0
0
1
28
Katerina (Katarina) Kolozova
Larry H Summers was wrong - and the outraged women in the audience overreacted, but their reasoning was not wrong - because, look at the data: in Iran, 70% of the students in STEM are women. They excel internationally. So, "more women in STEM" is indeed a question of policy, and not even necessarily a feminist one. Both Summers and his critics think in terms of cultural-gendered identity. It is not a question of identity in the case of Iran (also Saudi Arabia). It is a structural issue, tackled through structural measures.
English
5
0
5
1.6K
Alice Evans
Alice Evans@_alice_evans·
Britain is one of the most gender equal countries in the world, but with a huge increase in sexual assault The Government, with data access, should investigate the drivers of this shift, Eg. MeToo proclivity to report, new offence categories, rising proclivity for violence?
Alice Evans tweet media
English
46
10
94
18.3K
Zack Polanski
Zack Polanski@ZackPolanski·
The Mail doesn't think seem to think workers, of all ages, are worth £15 an hour. That's fair pay for a fair day's work, with money workers will put back into the economy. We are the party for workers. Vote Green on 7th May.
Zack Polanski tweet media
English
4.5K
1.4K
7.5K
1.6M
PoliticsJOE
PoliticsJOE@PoliticsJOE_UK·
“A lot of this sort of highfalutin economic stuff. It's basically all made up nonsense. “Labour imposed fiscal rules on themselves." MP Sorcha Eastwood says Labour’s budgets are nonsense.
English
68
88
414
164.4K
Kemi Badenoch
Kemi Badenoch@KemiBadenoch·
Graham Linehan should never have been dragged through the courts in the first place. The real scandal is a system that wastes time on litigious nonsense driven by professional activists while serious crime goes unpunished. We need to kill cancel culture. Free speech cannot survive if the process becomes the punishment. This is why I asked Toby Young to review the laws that are stifling free speech so the next Conservative government can put an end to this wasting of our resources.
Kemi Badenoch tweet media
English
1.1K
2.5K
19.5K
561.5K