baz

After politely requesting a support contract from Microsoft for long term maintenance, they offered a one-time payment of a few thousand dollars instead. This is unacceptable. We didn't make it up, this is what @microsoft @microsoftteams actually did: #comment:4" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/10341#c…

@PicturesFoIder well sure, with 17 being a prime number and all.. water flows uphill..

@Dash_Community does dash have a letter of legal opinion, stating that it is not a security?

The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is suing Bittrex for what they allege is selling illegal securities. One of the assets listed was #Dash 😯 There's no reasonable interpretation that would call Dash a security. Let's break down what this means👇 1/11

I will admit to being slightly disappointed..

'sharing xpubs is bad..' pipe down you muppets.. only Ruben Somsen stating that it isnt..

@BittrexGlobal Hi Bittrex, Have two support tickets with you guys now; have been without my money for 3-4 days. Please get this resolved.

@barrysty1e @barrysty1e Hey! We’d love to help. Please send us a DM.

@BittrexGlobal anyone else getting this error? No email confirmations either.

@UberFacts Banks and 'transaction reordering', leading inevitably to account overdraw fees.

What scam has become so normalized that people don't even notice it? 💭

@OhGodAGirl our inbuilt compass points to the closest vn commodore

@Medi_Naseri @bh30317 @OGBTC @laurentiapool it is incredibly simple to check for this, by using a shim or stratum proxy to listen for the mining.notify broadcast.. you can additionally see the address that the pool uses in the coinbase fields

@bh30317 @OGBTC Even the savvy miners would never know! It is all about minimizing the element of trust in dealing with pools. In practice all pools manage the funds the same way except for @laurentiapool which hasn't been well received by the industry just yet.

I think BIP47 should be industry standard for mining pool payouts As the industry has moved to FPPS payout schemas and mining at home is prevalent we need to shift #Bitcoin

@hash_bender @AB_Brammer @OGBTC hear hear! the catchcry seems to be 'dont share xpub'.. however seconds after creating a new wallet in electrum/bitcoin core etc, this argument dissolves.. xpub also does not require linking payments, nor are you locked into any vendor specific wallet.

@AB_Brammer @OGBTC Here’s my opinion on current implementations. Adding true support to the base layer would be a nice addition though I’m not sure I would go as far as to say it should be the de facto payout mechanism for miners. xpub solves this already, though somewhat less elegant

@BlockMunchClub @Ravencoin have a port of yiimp for kawpow ready to go..

We've got 0.0125 BTC for anyone that provides a working KAWPOW Yiimp stratum to us! Join our discord at discord.gg/kEwgj4T and apply! @Ravencoin

@YoshiJaeger with or without depends?

My old Mac Book Pro 2015 took over 30 minutes to compile DigiByte-Core. My new Mac Book Pro M1 (2021) only requires about 1 minute. It's a huge difference. #DigiByte

@OGBTC @OhGodAGirl @hash_bender hmm, no.. keyderiv is complete, i dont have access to luxor's stratum source - so everything on my end is done (github.com/barrystyle/key…).

@OhGodAGirl @hash_bender @barrysty1e I paid him 0.02 as did someone else as it’s incomplete and not paynym explicitly. Once it gets implemented I’ll push the rest

Alright @hash_bender the boy @barrysty1e says he’s finished github.com/barrystyle/pay…

@OhGodAGirl @OGBTC @hash_bender thanks for the bounty payment @OhGodAGirl, appreciated!

@AlexChainlink @cryptopopara AFAIK is not possible to use a stealth address destination, in a coinbase (aka mining) transaction.

@cryptopopara Will they be able to hide this information with mbwb?

@YoshiJaeger Base58 aka Legacy addresses have inbuilt checksumming, bech32 has some protection against mistakes but it isn’t infallible. Eth addresses have no means of error checking, besides the case checksumming that is not mandatory.

Segwit addresses almost solve this as it has a checksum in the end of the address. However, let me propose a solution: why not a verification id next to the address? For instance: The decimal representation modulo 2 billion? Easy to verify for humans, hard to fake for bots

@OGBTC @hash_bender github.com/barrystyle/pay… generation of paynym outputs, i know @hash_bender will be stoked with this :)

@hash_bender @barrysty1e What part of I want paynym doesn’t make sense. They wrote the code for you

@OGBTC @hash_bender github.com/barrystyle/key… this is my working implementation. user adds their xpub to the pool, thats it.. key derivation occurs per payout. simple as.

@hash_bender @barrysty1e No I want paynym. Someone else suggested xpub