henny

@Ilikenwjsandnct @cahay25463 @kkreuzz @pannchoa so if she was never going to be called unproblematic, then why would she take accountability for it?

@basedhaerin @cahay25463 @kkreuzz @pannchoa Maybe if she acknowledged what she did and took accountability maybe it wouldn't be as bad as it is but no she ignored it and regardless of how long ago it was it's still problematic stop trying to make excuses

Jennie's face card from 22 y'o to 30 y'o tinyurl.com/2y4ppb95

"Make a heart if you love NewJeans" TWICE's Sana and Tzuyu: 🫶🫶

@Ilikenwjsandnct @cahay25463 @kkreuzz @pannchoa alright let’s just grant that saying the n word predebut makes someone “problematic.” fine. so how much time needs to go by before you become unproblematic again? or are you just damned for all eternity?

@cahay25463 @kkreuzz @pannchoa Except it wasn’t random she literally said the n word multiple times too and it was on video she’s still problematic and so r many other idols and im not afraid to admit that and I won’t defend it even when its my favs calling her unproblematic js bc many others r doesnt justify

@JonnyCandle @basedcatpetter @Whokaux @PopBase Let all these ratios be your reminder that people actually have brains and don’t assume every accusation is true just because it’s a woman who said it.

@basedcatpetter @Whokaux @PopBase What the fuck is wrong with you?

Ruby Rose has accused Katy Perry of sexually assaulting her around 20 years ago. She alleges Perry rubbed her “disgusting v**ina” on her face, causing Rose to vomit. She adds that she filed a police report regarding the incident a few hours ago.

@ARIESZZZZZN @Whokaux @PopBase Possibly because she’s not actually a victim. Y’all always act like people never lie

@Whokaux @PopBase Yall always say shit like this and wonder why victims dont speak up

NEWJEANS X STATESIDE ☆

@JudeFenty I get it, she’s way more animated than she should be, but it’s just her being excited and happy bro… chill

@warbird @50ShadesOfSeoul Because digital IP theft and real life physical theft are obviously different, but the morality remains the same. You are taking something that isn’t yours and using it for an unauthorized purpose. Idk what’s so hard to understand here for you.

@basedhaerin @50ShadesOfSeoul Nothing wrong with mental gymnastics, although you are the one twisting it. I maintain that copyright infringement isn't theft because the original is still in place. I don't know why you can't just accept that.

World's Largest Anime Piracy Website 'HiAnime' has shut down

@warbird @50ShadesOfSeoul Cloning is copying is handled by copyright which is in the realm of theft. The mental gymnastics here is twisting you into a pretzel

@basedhaerin @50ShadesOfSeoul x.com/i/status/20320…

@warbird @50ShadesOfSeoul There you go. Janitor. Cleaner. Custodial professional. All are talking about the exact same person. Just like how Copyright Infringement and IP theft are the exact same concept and are handled accordingly under the law regarding theft. You’re starting to get it now 😃

@basedhaerin @50ShadesOfSeoul It's not theft because the original isn't taken. We should not call it theft. You can keep your laws against it and call it copyright infringement instead. I don't know anything about what a janitor or custodial professional is. I think we just call them cleaners.

@warbird @50ShadesOfSeoul You can’t enforce laws that don’t exist. You literally don’t even know what to call it bro lol

@basedhaerin @50ShadesOfSeoul We have laws against assault and fraud and jaywalking and all kinds of things that are not theft. Just because it's not called theft does not mean there can't be laws against it.

@warbird @50ShadesOfSeoul Yes that all falls in the realm of theft. Not “theft-adjacent.” I bring you back to my “custodial professional” is just a fancy way to say “janitor” example. Copyright deals with theft and improper use thereof. It’s that simple. It’s still theft.

@basedhaerin @50ShadesOfSeoul Yes we do have laws against theft adjacent things. Just look at the laws against copyright infringement for example. Copyright infringement isn't theft, but there are laws against it.

@warbird @50ShadesOfSeoul We have laws against theft. We don’t have laws against “theft-adjacent but not really theft so let’s find a better word for it” things. So in your worldview he’s doing nothing wrong. And why would he pay for something that’s free and unlimited? It’s just not free for you.

@basedhaerin @50ShadesOfSeoul Oh it isn't against the law? I thought it was! Oh well so long as he's paying me for the use then that's OK.

@warbird @50ShadesOfSeoul No he won’t. He has no reason to since it isn’t against the law according to your view. He needs to get to work in the morning after all.

@basedhaerin @50ShadesOfSeoul I'd just tell him not to and he'd stop doing it.

@warbird @50ShadesOfSeoul Then the guy hooking an extension cord to your porch to charge his Tesla doesn’t need to face any charges.

@basedhaerin @50ShadesOfSeoul Theft involves removing something so that the original can no longer be used.

@warbird @50ShadesOfSeoul Did you just refuse to read any of that? You’ve still not demonstrated how it’s not theft. Just “it’s not theft it’s just something similar to theft but i don’t wanna concede it’s theft so we need another word for it.” That’s your entire argument. I remain unconvinced.

@basedhaerin @50ShadesOfSeoul OK, so now you can see why we should not call piracy theft?

@warbird @50ShadesOfSeoul The same way “a custodial professional” just means “janitor,” “unauthorized/fraudulent use of electrical power” just means “stealing electricity” aka theft

@warbird @50ShadesOfSeoul We have those laws because society treats it as theft. Plain and simple. The law can be more specific in naming for legal purposes, but it’s theft in every sense of the word.

@warbird @50ShadesOfSeoul Why should he care if you think it’s bad? We only have laws against theft. Since this isn’t theft, he’s just making use of an unlimited resource available to him.

@basedhaerin @50ShadesOfSeoul Oh they aren't taking directly from me, that's why it's not stealing you see. It is indirectly taking. You can tell him that, but it is very important you give the context that I think it's bad for him to do and explain that I can't really afford to be paying for his use.

@warbird @50ShadesOfSeoul Yeah I wonder what that word will be when someone directly takes something from you, leading to a loss on your behalf. Until then I’ll be sure to let your neighbor know when he runs an extension cord from your porch to his EV that he’s technically not stealing according to you.

@basedhaerin @50ShadesOfSeoul No, it wouldn't be stealing. It would be something very similar to stealing and it would be a bad thing, but I don't know what the word for it would/should be.