Jan

19.2K posts

Jan banner
Jan

Jan

@baulnim

지식근로자 협동조합 [라플] // CuMa_Concept Creator // NSA-B1 offi- // 777전우회 // D 기획팀장 // 상식과 신념을 지지합니다 // 창세기전4 Jan // 주사위의잔영 얀지슈카 // ff14 초코보 Janzisuka

seoul, korea Katılım Haziran 2009
146 Takip Edilen231 Takipçiler
Jan
Jan@baulnim·
@GenG_KR 아놀드 손가락 좀 막아요. 괜히 기인이야기 하면서 끌고온 자료로 캐니언만 부족하다고 욕 먹게 하고 에효 진짜 선수들은 좋은데 팀이 리스크네
한국어
0
1
16
2.8K
젠지 이스포츠 | Gen.G Esports
김건부(Canyon) 선수의 <2026 아이치-나고야 아시안게임> 대한민국 이스포츠 국가대표팀 합류를 축하합니다. 대한민국의 이름으로 새로운 도전에 나서는 김건부 선수에게 많은 응원 부탁드립니다.
젠지 이스포츠 | Gen.G Esports tweet media
한국어
9
517
1.4K
68.8K
Jan
Jan@baulnim·
@arnoldwh 코크가 그런 리스크를 지려고 할까?
한국어
0
0
0
429
Jan
Jan@baulnim·
Arnold say. Fxxxx wrong to select Canyon!!
Gen.G Arnold@arnoldwh

Now let's talk about MSI, and why I wanted to establish that the criteria themselves are flawed before getting into this. I still do not know why MSI, the midseason international event, wasn't in the criteria, while KESPA Cup, a preseason event, was. So I pulled Riot's API and ran their own criteria stats across 2024–2026: EWC 2025, MSI 2024–25, Worlds 2024–25, LCK 2024–26, and First Stand 2025–26. The result: Kiin ranks #1 in Overall (image 1), and clearly so. Include KESPA Cup (image 2) as well and the margin narrows, but he's still #1. For a moment, I'm willing to set aside every concern about whether these are even the right metrics, and take their stat list exactly as given. Even then, the moment the event scope is wider, Kiin is the top player. He only isn't #1 if the window stays narrow, limited to just their chosen list of events. And you don't even have to agree with my earlier point that the metrics themselves are flawed. Even using their statistical metrics across a wider, fairer set of events, their own numbers put Kiin first. Kiin deserves better.

English
0
0
0
189
Jan
Jan@baulnim·
@yulmooooo_ 그거 안빼면 캐니언을 저격하게 되니깐요. 진짜 아놀드는 멍청해요
한국어
0
0
2
384
율뮤⁹⁸
율뮤⁹⁸@yulmooooo_·
궁금한게 ewc 24는 왜 빼나요? 본인팀 우승한 25는 넣고 지표를 만들거면 다 넣어야하는거 아닌가 왜 입맛대로 하시는지? 저 최종 지표까지 보면 0.35% 차이인데 이정도는 감독이 그리는 플랜에 따라 선수를 선발했겠지요? 불만이 있으면 정당한 방식으로 이의제기를 해요 여기서 선동하지말고
Gen.G Arnold@arnoldwh

Now let's talk about MSI, and why I wanted to establish that the criteria themselves are flawed before getting into this. I still do not know why MSI, the midseason international event, wasn't in the criteria, while KESPA Cup, a preseason event, was. So I pulled Riot's API and ran their own criteria stats across 2024–2026: EWC 2025, MSI 2024–25, Worlds 2024–25, LCK 2024–26, and First Stand 2025–26. The result: Kiin ranks #1 in Overall (image 1), and clearly so. Include KESPA Cup (image 2) as well and the margin narrows, but he's still #1. For a moment, I'm willing to set aside every concern about whether these are even the right metrics, and take their stat list exactly as given. Even then, the moment the event scope is wider, Kiin is the top player. He only isn't #1 if the window stays narrow, limited to just their chosen list of events. And you don't even have to agree with my earlier point that the metrics themselves are flawed. Even using their statistical metrics across a wider, fairer set of events, their own numbers put Kiin first. Kiin deserves better.

한국어
3
4
71
8.8K
Jan
Jan@baulnim·
@arnoldwh 대승민, 커즈, 비디디만 해도 월즈랑 리그에서 기인 캐니언 쵸비 아닥시켰는데? 뭐 안뽑힌 팀 팬들은 다 수긍해서 조용하냐? 몸값이랑 지표 다 높은 선수들만 모은다고 팀이돼? 그래서 젠지가 돈으로 다 사서 매번 월즈에서 DRX, 티원, KT 만나서 지고 감독탓 선수탓 하면서 내보내던건가?
한국어
1
0
0
635
Jan
Jan@baulnim·
@arnoldwh 그러게요. 그러니 캐니언은 왜 선발 된거죠? 참 웃기네 대표팀 감독의 플랜이 있겠죠 못 뽑힌 팀들은 조용히 응원만 보내는데 왜 아놀드 저건 항상 저짓거리지; 뭐 어쩌잔거야 그냥 현1위팀 내보내? 월즈 쓰리핏팀 내보내? 또 지표놀이 하고싶어?? 잠깐 아놀드가 구단 운영하고 월즈 기록이...헉!
한국어
1
0
28
2.8K
Gen.G Arnold
Gen.G Arnold@arnoldwh·
Oh and not counting MSI? I don’t even know how to address that since I can’t even understand the base logic of it…
English
75
219
1.4K
114.3K
Jan
Jan@baulnim·
우리팀은...뭐...실력 없어서 가만히 있냐?? 승민이도 커즈도 보성이도 하람이도 상메도 잘한다?!
한국어
0
0
0
39
Jan
Jan@baulnim·
@arnoldwh 외국인이 타국가 국가대표에 대해 왈가왈부 하는 것도 웃기지만 뭐 결국 본인 자산(선수)의 가치를 올려서 돈놀이 하는거지 뭐... 개시러 진짜 짜치네
한국어
0
0
0
563
Jan
Jan@baulnim·
@arnoldwh Genius : raising suspicions about Canyon being selected?! ah!
English
0
0
0
122
Gen.G Arnold
Gen.G Arnold@arnoldwh·
I want to say something about Kiin, because I want to be direct with our fanbase about how I feel. They published the selection criteria. Read them for yourself, because they matter. After the achievement-based shortlist, the final roster came down to what they themselves called "detailed individual metrics." If you understand the game, look at that list and ask one question: what does a top laner do to make most of those numbers go up? He gets the favorable matchup. He gets the comfort pick. He gets resources funneled into his lane. Solo kills, DPM, DPG, gold diff at 14, CS diff at 14, every one of those climbs when the draft is built around you, and sinks when you give the lane up so a teammate can have theirs. Now ask what Kiin does. Kiin is the top laner who says "draft around everyone else and give me the leftover pick, I'll make it work." He takes the counterpick so a teammate gets comfort. He eats the hard matchup so the map opens elsewhere. Every one of those choices is a teammate's DPM going up instead of his. He trades his stat line for his team's win condition, every single game. There's no column on that list for that. The closest it comes to team value, gold share, damage share, still rewards the player who gets the resources, not the one who gives them up. And champion pool size is right there on the list: a metric that should favor exactly the kind of flexible player Kiin is. He plays one of the widest, most selfless pools in the role and still didn't make it. And before anyone runs with this: this is not about Zeus. Zeus is world-class and earned his spot. The players aren't the problem. The measuring stick is. We need to more rigorously test the statistics we cite, especially when it becomes a measuring stick that can impact decisions like these. If your criteria are built mostly from individual mechanical stats without proper statistical context, you haven't found the best players, you've found the players whose teams were built to make them look best. Kiin plays the game the right way. If these metrics say otherwise, the metrics are the problem, not Kiin, and not the players who were picked. To Kiin's fans: you already know this. You watched him do it. Please show him more support than ever.
Gen.G Arnold tweet media
English
436
710
4.4K
1.2M
Jan
Jan@baulnim·
arnold say : 기인을 빼다니 엿같다. 팬들아 지랄해줘. Why not Kiin?!?! Why canyon?!?! so what?! fxxx 캐니언이 뽑힌 것에 대한 의혹 제기를 아놀드가 한것이군?!
Gen.G Arnold@arnoldwh

I want to say something about Kiin, because I want to be direct with our fanbase about how I feel. They published the selection criteria. Read them for yourself, because they matter. After the achievement-based shortlist, the final roster came down to what they themselves called "detailed individual metrics." If you understand the game, look at that list and ask one question: what does a top laner do to make most of those numbers go up? He gets the favorable matchup. He gets the comfort pick. He gets resources funneled into his lane. Solo kills, DPM, DPG, gold diff at 14, CS diff at 14, every one of those climbs when the draft is built around you, and sinks when you give the lane up so a teammate can have theirs. Now ask what Kiin does. Kiin is the top laner who says "draft around everyone else and give me the leftover pick, I'll make it work." He takes the counterpick so a teammate gets comfort. He eats the hard matchup so the map opens elsewhere. Every one of those choices is a teammate's DPM going up instead of his. He trades his stat line for his team's win condition, every single game. There's no column on that list for that. The closest it comes to team value, gold share, damage share, still rewards the player who gets the resources, not the one who gives them up. And champion pool size is right there on the list: a metric that should favor exactly the kind of flexible player Kiin is. He plays one of the widest, most selfless pools in the role and still didn't make it. And before anyone runs with this: this is not about Zeus. Zeus is world-class and earned his spot. The players aren't the problem. The measuring stick is. We need to more rigorously test the statistics we cite, especially when it becomes a measuring stick that can impact decisions like these. If your criteria are built mostly from individual mechanical stats without proper statistical context, you haven't found the best players, you've found the players whose teams were built to make them look best. Kiin plays the game the right way. If these metrics say otherwise, the metrics are the problem, not Kiin, and not the players who were picked. To Kiin's fans: you already know this. You watched him do it. Please show him more support than ever.

한국어
0
0
0
184
Jan
Jan@baulnim·
@arnoldwh arnold say : 기인을 빼다니 엿같다. 팬들아 지랄해줘. Why not Kiin?!?! Why canyon?!?! so what?! fxxx
한국어
0
0
0
156
Jan retweetledi
Unicycle
Unicycle@uuunicycle·
I doodled some KT OC (unofficial) stickers! Feel free to use them as you wish! (non-commercial) Do not AI🥰 #KTWIN
Unicycle tweet mediaUnicycle tweet media
English
7
145
342
13.4K
Jan
Jan@baulnim·
@arnoldwh 이런 평가로 기인이 아쉽기는 하겠지만 반대로 캐니언이 뽑힌게 더 웃기긴하네 기인을 빼? 애매할수도 있음 캐니언이 뽑혀? 왜???
한국어
0
0
2
1.1K
Jan
Jan@baulnim·
@goldenboughbook ㅠㅠ 아쉽네여... 그럼에도!! 기대해봅니다!
한국어
0
0
0
27
황금가지편집장
황금가지편집장@goldenboughbook·
@baulnim 하하하. 작가님께서 현장 행사에 방문하셔야 하는데, 거절하셔서 아마 수상이 어렵지 않나 그렇게 보고 있습니다.
한국어
1
0
0
131
황금가지편집장
황금가지편집장@goldenboughbook·
[동아일보/오염된 잔] "읽을수록 ‘셜록 홈스’+‘진격의 거인’+‘퍼시픽 림’+‘서던 리치’가 떠오르는 것은 왜일까." donga.com/news/Culture/a…
한국어
1
1
4
1.4K
Jan
Jan@baulnim·
역겨운 팀. 쵸비야 다른 팀에선 꼭 월즈 들어보자. 적어도 저따위 팀에 있는건 최고의 선수인 네가 너무 안타깝다. 진짜 마지막 구절까지 사족으로 완벽하네. 에효. 동북공정의 선두자 같구만..
Gen.G Esports@GenG

안녕하세요, 젠지 이스포츠 입니다. 저희는 LCK 조사위원회가 최근 룰러 선수와 관련된 사안에 대한 검토를 마치고 별도의 제재 조치를 부과하지 않기로 결정했음을 확인하였습니다. 무엇보다 팬 여러분께 오랜 시간 걱정과 불편을 끼쳐드린 점에 대해 깊이 사과드립니다. 지난 한 달은 이 팀을 아껴주시는 모든 분들께 결코 가볍지 않은 시간이 아니었을 것입니다. 그럼에도 끝까지 지켜봐 주신 점에 대해 진심으로 감사드립니다. 구단은 조사위원회의 절차를 존중하며, 사실관계 확인이 이루어지는 동안 관련 입장 표명을 자제해 왔습니다. 이 과정에서 팬 여러분께서 느끼셨을 답답함과 우려에 대해서는 충분히 인지하고 있습니다. 구단의 대응이 팬 여러분의 기대에 미치지 못하게 느껴졌을 수 있다는 점 역시 무겁게 받아들이고 있습니다. 룰러 선수는 조사 전 과정에 성실히 임했으며, 이번 사안과 관련된 모든 과정에 대해 책임 있는 자세로 임하겠다는 입장을 밝혔습니다. 구단 또한 이에 필요한 모든 협조를 다할 계획입니다. 젠지 이스포츠는 이번 사안에 대한 비판은 겸허히 받아들이고, 부족했던 부분은 개선해 나가겠습니다. 다만, 구단은 소속 선수를 보호해야 할 책임이 있는 만큼, 사실관계가 확인되지 않은 내용에 대해서는 선수측 법률 대리인이 필요한 대응을 주도하고 있으며, 구단은 이에 대해 적극적으로 지원하겠습니다. 다시 한 번 팬 여러분께 심려를 끼쳐드린 점 깊이 사과드립니다. We have confirmed that the LCK Investigation Committee has concluded its review of the recent matter involving Gen.G League of Legends player Ruler, and determined that no separate sanction will be imposed. Above all, we deeply apologize to our fans for the worry and difficulty caused over this extended period. The past month has not been an easy time for anyone who cares about this team. We sincerely thank you for staying with us through it all. Gen.G has respected the Investigation Committee’s process and refrained from making public statements while the facts were being verified. We fully recognize the frustration and concern our fans may have felt during this time. We also take seriously the possibility that our response may not have met our fans’ expectations. Ruler engaged with the entire investigation in good faith and has stated his commitment to handling all matters related to this case with a sense of responsibility. Gen.G will provide every form of cooperation needed in this regard. We humbly accept the criticism directed at us in this matter and will work to improve where we fell short. At the same time, as an organization with a responsibility to protect its players, the player’s legal representatives are leading the necessary response to any claims that are not based on verified facts, and Gen.G will actively support those efforts. Once again, we deeply apologize to our fans for the concern this has caused.

한국어
0
0
1
844