PoW

@MatrixPrime_ new generation have much less freedom. life sucks even more for them. what is point of money as few can live outside of the new order

JOBS CUTS BY YEARS FOR HUMANS by A.I. 2026 A.I. takes 14% of human jobs 2027 A.I. takes 33% of Human jobs capitalism at its breaking point 2028 A.I. take 48% of human jobs BASIC INCOME 2029 A.I. takes 66% of human Jobs 2030 A.I. takes 79% of Human jobs 2033 a NEW WORLD ORDER IS FORMED

@Mr_P88lsara what ever u posted never pumped the price for years. the real usd price is much lower than in the past regardless of what the ratio is.

Dropping more bombs than trump after 1 for 1. Don’t wait 🔜 💎🛜

@ViroLIEgy do you agree with grok's answer here? dpaste.com/9C2VUTFLE-prev…

“Asymptomatic carriers” don’t disprove the first postulate—they prove it worked. Finding the “cause” in the healthy means it was never the cause at all. When falsification is rebranded as exception, science becomes belief. 1. viroliegy.com/2022/10/10/koc… 2. viroliegy.com/2024/09/12/the…

Defenders of germ “theory” dismiss Koch’s first postulate—that a microbe should be found only in the sick, not the healthy—as “outdated” because of asymptomatic carriers. But that excuse turns a criterion meant to falsify the germ hypothesis into an unfalsifiable belief.

@dippydappyduck @tupaceros We might use different words for the same thing. I agree what you mean by crown do exist. Other names could be the ruling class. it is just unclear to me why you think that they hate jews. so what make them special that even the crown hate them?

@be_prepared___ @tupaceros The Crown is a physical apparatus. Like the UN for example, which The Crown created and owns. Putting in in quotes only exposes your motive to deny its existence, so your question is a camouflage for your real motive. Take the quotes off, and I might take you seriously.

@dippydappyduck @tupaceros so why does "the crown" hate them?

@tupaceros Both Rothschilds and Baruchs are key agents working FOR The Crown, and both sets are Jew-haters.👍

@ViroLIEgy i have quotaion mark "truth" in original sentence. I don't mean all versions are true.

@be_prepared___ That’s not how science works. There aren’t “many versions of truth”—there’s either evidence that holds up under scrutiny or it doesn’t. If an alternative theory fails logical or empirical tests, it should be rejected.

What if Koch’s Postulates—essential for proving a microbe causes disease—were never satisfied for syphilis? And what if "syphilis" is just a collection of symptoms mislabeled for over a century? Discover the syphilis scam in part 1 of a 3-part investigation. Link in the comments.

@ViroLIEgy x.com/5DSoul/status/… need to be careful with alternative theory too, for example this. there are many versions of "truth", pulished at differnt time.

@be_prepared___ Exactly. And when something often functions as circular logic, that undermines the whole framework. Pointing to rare exceptions doesn’t fix the problem—it just shows the rule is broken but occasionally masked.

@xianren33 hi, is he correct? 😂😂😂x.com/5DSoul/status/…

@ViroLIEgy I do not know if exceptions are rare yet, although there are proof of theory being manipulated. but there are many things we don't understand which need hypothesis. One other example come to my mind is cancer. they say cancer need to be disnosed early.

@ViroLIEgy this is often the case. but i guess there are exceptions.

@be_prepared___ Thank you—that’s the problem. When a test becomes the foundation of a diagnosis, not symptoms or actual disease, the theory becomes circular. The test defines the illness, and the illness justifies the test. That’s not science—it’s self-reinforcing dogma.

@ViroLIEgy some people tried very hard to turn negative, but they can't!

@ViroLIEgy with sypisis , i observed somepeople test multiple times it stays postive. even if they can be considered healthy. it is not nice to look at. and in many cases a clean result is required.(job, marriage, travel etc)

@ViroLIEgy my personal experience with it is that i was consistently negative result every time i tested my blood in the past.

@ViroLIEgy as i observed in online group recently, those diagnosed with syphisis do test muptiple times, and is consistently positive. although i do not know how long it will stay positive. it varies depending on the person. for short term, it is possible to observe.

@ViroLIEgy i have said my new comment today was not about how long it will stay consistent. (I won't know)

@be_prepared___ You’re now speculating about how a “scam” might work, not citing evidence that long-term consistent testing actually occurs. My point stands: without a study showing long-term, repeated positive results across years, there is no proof of test consistency—just an assumption.

@ViroLIEgy my new comment was not about how long it will be consistent.(I won't know)

@be_prepared___ Share the long-term study demonstrating this.